Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Urology 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Vesicorenal Reflux | Research

Single-port plus one in pediatric robotic-assisted Lich-Gregoir ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux, a comparative analysis with short-term outcomes

Authors: Jianglong Chen, Yingquan Kang, Shan Lin, Shaohua He, Yufeng He, Xinru Xu, Huihuang Xu, Guangxu You, Di Xu

Published in: BMC Urology | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To observe the safety and short-term outcomes of a new way of laparoscopic trocar placement in pediatric robotic-assisted Lich-Gregoir ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux.

Methods

The retrospective study included 32 patients under 14 years diagnosed with primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). All these patients underwent robotic-assisted Lich-Gregoir ureteral reimplantation in our department from December 2020 to August 2022. These patients were divided into the following groups according to the different ways of trocar placement: 13 patients in group single-port plus one (SR) and 19 patients in group multiple-port (MR). Patients’ characteristics as well as their perioperative and follow-up data were collected and evaluated.

Results

There was no significant difference in the data regarding patients’ characteristics and preoperative data. These data included the grade of vesicoureteral reflux according to the voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG), and the differential degree of renal function (DRF) at the following time points: preoperative, postoperative, and comparison of preoperative and postoperative. There was no difference between the two groups. During surgery, the time of artificial pneumoperitoneum establishment, ureteral reimplantation time, and total operative time in the SR group were longer than those in the MR group. Yet only the time of artificial pneumoperitoneum establishment shows a statistical difference (P < 0.0001). Also, the peri-operative data, including the volume of blood loss, fasting time, hospitalization, and length of time that a ureteral catheter remained in place, and the number of postoperative complications demonstrate no difference. In addition, the SFU grade and VCUG grade at the following time point also show no difference between the two groups.

Conclusion

The study demonstrates that SR in robotic-assisted Lich-Gregoir ureteral reimplantation has reached the same surgical effects as MR. In addition, the single-port plus one trocar placement receives a higher cosmetic satisfaction score from parents and did not increase the surgical time and complexity.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Chen SQX, Chen L, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-port surgery for Comprehensive Staging of Early Ovarian Cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(5):806.CrossRefPubMed Chen SQX, Chen L, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-port surgery for Comprehensive Staging of Early Ovarian Cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(5):806.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Lainas PDJ, Dammaro C, et al. Single-port laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of severe obesity: review and perspectives. Obes Surg. 2020;30(7):2781–90.CrossRefPubMed Lainas PDJ, Dammaro C, et al. Single-port laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of severe obesity: review and perspectives. Obes Surg. 2020;30(7):2781–90.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Klazura GGA, Sims T, et al. Assessment of the Da Vinci Single Port Robotic Platform on Cholecystectomy in adolescents. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022;32(4):438–41.CrossRefPubMed Klazura GGA, Sims T, et al. Assessment of the Da Vinci Single Port Robotic Platform on Cholecystectomy in adolescents. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022;32(4):438–41.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Eichel LAT, Clayman RV. Role of robotics in laparoscopic urologic surgery. Urol Clin North Am. 2004(31):781–92. Eichel LAT, Clayman RV. Role of robotics in laparoscopic urologic surgery. Urol Clin North Am. 2004(31):781–92.
9.
go back to reference Bogliolo SFS, Cassani C, et al. Single-site versus multiport robotic hysterectomy in benign gynecologic diseases: a retrospective evaluation of surgical outcomes and cost analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(4):603–09.CrossRefPubMed Bogliolo SFS, Cassani C, et al. Single-site versus multiport robotic hysterectomy in benign gynecologic diseases: a retrospective evaluation of surgical outcomes and cost analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(4):603–09.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference El Hachem LMM, Friedman K, et al. Safety, feasibility and learning curve of robotic single-site surgery in gynecology. Int J Med Robot. 2016;12(3):509–16.CrossRefPubMed El Hachem LMM, Friedman K, et al. Safety, feasibility and learning curve of robotic single-site surgery in gynecology. Int J Med Robot. 2016;12(3):509–16.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pontarelli EMEC, Nguyen NX, Torres M, Anselmo DM. Singleincision laparoscopic resection of ovarian masses in children: a preliminary report. Pediatr Surg Int. 2013;29(7):715–8.CrossRefPubMed Pontarelli EMEC, Nguyen NX, Torres M, Anselmo DM. Singleincision laparoscopic resection of ovarian masses in children: a preliminary report. Pediatr Surg Int. 2013;29(7):715–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Xu DGH, Yu S, et al. Ensuring safety and feasibility for resection of pediatric benign ovarian tumors by single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery using the Da Vinci Xi system. Front Surg. 2022;19(9):944662.CrossRef Xu DGH, Yu S, et al. Ensuring safety and feasibility for resection of pediatric benign ovarian tumors by single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery using the Da Vinci Xi system. Front Surg. 2022;19(9):944662.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chen CWCH, Huang TF, et al. Transition from multiport to single-site surgery: a single institution experience in robotic supracervical hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;58(4):514–19.CrossRefPubMed Chen CWCH, Huang TF, et al. Transition from multiport to single-site surgery: a single institution experience in robotic supracervical hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;58(4):514–19.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Iavazzo CGI. Robotic single-port platform for gynecologic surgery: indications, outcomes and challenges. Updates Surg. 2021;73(6):2391–92.CrossRefPubMed Iavazzo CGI. Robotic single-port platform for gynecologic surgery: indications, outcomes and challenges. Updates Surg. 2021;73(6):2391–92.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Chen JXH, Lin S, et al. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a comparison of single-port-plus-one and multiport surgery. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:957790.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen JXH, Lin S, et al. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a comparison of single-port-plus-one and multiport surgery. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:957790.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Lin SCJ, Tang K, et al. Trans-umbilical single-port plus one robotic assisted surgery for Choledochal Cyst in Children, a comparing to laparoscope-assisted Procedure. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:806919.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lin SCJ, Tang K, et al. Trans-umbilical single-port plus one robotic assisted surgery for Choledochal Cyst in Children, a comparing to laparoscope-assisted Procedure. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:806919.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Single-port plus one in pediatric robotic-assisted Lich-Gregoir ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux, a comparative analysis with short-term outcomes
Authors
Jianglong Chen
Yingquan Kang
Shan Lin
Shaohua He
Yufeng He
Xinru Xu
Huihuang Xu
Guangxu You
Di Xu
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Urology / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2490
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01467-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Urology 1/2024 Go to the issue