Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 9/2007

01-09-2007 | Original Article

Vertebral dimensions as risk factor of vertebral fracture in osteoporotic patients: a systematic literature review

Authors: A. Ruyssen-Witrand, L. Gossec, S. Kolta, M. Dougados, C. Roux

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 9/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

This systematic literature review studied the potential association between vertebral fracture risk and vertebral dimensions. Analysis showed that patients with vertebral fractures have smaller non-fractured vertebrae than patients without fractures. Vertebral size is an independent risk factor of vertebral fractures.

Introduction

Biomechanical factors such as vertebral dimensions may be a risk factor for vertebral fractures beside bone mineral density (BMD). The objective of this study was to evaluate potential association of vertebral size and shape with osteoporotic fracture risk through a systematic literature review.

Methods

Systematic analysis of published reports comparing vertebral dimensions of patients with and without osteoporotic fractures was performed. Data sources were electronic databases. Data extraction included methods, site, reproducibility and results of vertebral measurement, study population characteristics. It was noted if populations were matched or data were adjusted for age, height, weight and BMD.

Results

Of 634 reports identified by the literature search, the final review included 13 reports studying 4,428 women and 508 men; median age 64.2 years [range 51.7%–73.0%]. Measurements were performed with computed tomography scan, X-ray, or dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Vertebral body height, width, depth, area, cross-sectional area (CSA), and volume were 5.5% to 9.5% smaller in fractured group than control group. After adjustment for confounding factors, area, CSA and volume were, respectively, 10.2% [range 7.1%–13.3%], 7.7% [range 1.2%–14.2%] and 9.5% [8.5%–10.5%] smaller in fractured group.

Conclusions

Vertebral size should be considered as a potential independent vertebral fracture risk factor.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Melton LJ 3rd, Kan SH, Frye MA et al (1989) Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. Am J Epidemiol 129:1000–1011PubMed Melton LJ 3rd, Kan SH, Frye MA et al (1989) Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. Am J Epidemiol 129:1000–1011PubMed
2.
go back to reference Sievanen H, Kannus P, Nieminen V et al (1996) Estimation of various mechanical characteristics of human bones using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: methodology and precision. Bone 1817S–1827S Sievanen H, Kannus P, Nieminen V et al (1996) Estimation of various mechanical characteristics of human bones using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: methodology and precision. Bone 1817S–1827S
3.
go back to reference Odvina CV, Wergedal JE, Libanati CR et al (1988) Relationship between trabecular vertebral body density and fractures: a quantitative definition of spinal osteoporosis. Metabolism 37:221–228PubMedCrossRef Odvina CV, Wergedal JE, Libanati CR et al (1988) Relationship between trabecular vertebral body density and fractures: a quantitative definition of spinal osteoporosis. Metabolism 37:221–228PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Briggs AM, Greig AM, Wark JD et al (2004) A review of anatomical and mechanical factors affecting vertebral body integrity. Int J Med Sci 1:170–180PubMed Briggs AM, Greig AM, Wark JD et al (2004) A review of anatomical and mechanical factors affecting vertebral body integrity. Int J Med Sci 1:170–180PubMed
5.
go back to reference Gilsanz V, Boechat MI, Gilsanz R et al (1994) Gender differences in vertebral sizes in adults: biomechanical implications. Radiology 190:678–682PubMed Gilsanz V, Boechat MI, Gilsanz R et al (1994) Gender differences in vertebral sizes in adults: biomechanical implications. Radiology 190:678–682PubMed
6.
go back to reference Brinckmann P, Biggemann M, Hilweg D (1989) Prediction of the compressive strength of human lumbar vertebrae. Spine 14:606–610PubMedCrossRef Brinckmann P, Biggemann M, Hilweg D (1989) Prediction of the compressive strength of human lumbar vertebrae. Spine 14:606–610PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Faulkner KG, Cummings SR, Black D et al (1993) Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 8:1211–1217PubMed Faulkner KG, Cummings SR, Black D et al (1993) Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 8:1211–1217PubMed
9.
go back to reference Peacock M, Turner CH, Liu G et al (1995) Better discrimination of hip fracture using bone density, geometry and architecture. Osteoporosis Int 5:167–173CrossRef Peacock M, Turner CH, Liu G et al (1995) Better discrimination of hip fracture using bone density, geometry and architecture. Osteoporosis Int 5:167–173CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Nieves JW, Formica C, Ruffing J et al (2005) Males have larger skeletal size and bone mass than females, despite comparable body size. J Bone Miner Res 20:529–535PubMedCrossRef Nieves JW, Formica C, Ruffing J et al (2005) Males have larger skeletal size and bone mass than females, despite comparable body size. J Bone Miner Res 20:529–535PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Duan Y, Wang XF, Evans A, Seeman E (2005) Structural and biomechanical basis of racial and sex differences in vertebral fragility in Chinese and Caucasians. Bone 36:987–998PubMedCrossRef Duan Y, Wang XF, Evans A, Seeman E (2005) Structural and biomechanical basis of racial and sex differences in vertebral fragility in Chinese and Caucasians. Bone 36:987–998PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wu XP, Liao EY, Liu SP et al (2004) Relationship of body surface area with bone density and its risk of osteoporosis at various skeletal regions in women of mainland China. Osteoporosis Int 15:751–759 Wu XP, Liao EY, Liu SP et al (2004) Relationship of body surface area with bone density and its risk of osteoporosis at various skeletal regions in women of mainland China. Osteoporosis Int 15:751–759
13.
go back to reference Duan Y, Seeman E, Turner CH (2001) The biomechanical basis of vertebral body fragility in men and women. J Bone Miner Res 16:2276–2283PubMedCrossRef Duan Y, Seeman E, Turner CH (2001) The biomechanical basis of vertebral body fragility in men and women. J Bone Miner Res 16:2276–2283PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Duan Y, Turner CH, Kim BT, Seeman E (2001) Sexual dimorphism in vertebral fragility is more the result of gender differences in age-related bone gain than bone loss. J Bone Miner Res 16:2267–2275PubMedCrossRef Duan Y, Turner CH, Kim BT, Seeman E (2001) Sexual dimorphism in vertebral fragility is more the result of gender differences in age-related bone gain than bone loss. J Bone Miner Res 16:2267–2275PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Krolner B (1982) Osteoporosis and normality: how to express the bone mineral content of lumbar vertebrae. Clin Physiol 2:139–146PubMed Krolner B (1982) Osteoporosis and normality: how to express the bone mineral content of lumbar vertebrae. Clin Physiol 2:139–146PubMed
16.
go back to reference Nielsen SP, Hermansen F, Barenholdt O (1993) Interpretation of lumbar spine densitometry in women with fractures. Osteoporosis Int 3:276–282CrossRef Nielsen SP, Hermansen F, Barenholdt O (1993) Interpretation of lumbar spine densitometry in women with fractures. Osteoporosis Int 3:276–282CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mazess RB, Barden H, Mautalen C, Vega E (1994) Normalization of spine densitometry. J Bone Miner Res 9:541–548PubMed Mazess RB, Barden H, Mautalen C, Vega E (1994) Normalization of spine densitometry. J Bone Miner Res 9:541–548PubMed
18.
go back to reference Ito M, Ohki M, Hayashi K et al (1997) Relationship of spinal fracture to bone density, textural, and anthropometric parameters. Calcif Tissue Int 60:240–244PubMedCrossRef Ito M, Ohki M, Hayashi K et al (1997) Relationship of spinal fracture to bone density, textural, and anthropometric parameters. Calcif Tissue Int 60:240–244PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ross PD, Huang C, Davis JW, Wasnich RD (1995) Vertebral dimension measurements improve prediction of vertebral fracture incidence. Bone 16:257S–262SPubMedCrossRef Ross PD, Huang C, Davis JW, Wasnich RD (1995) Vertebral dimension measurements improve prediction of vertebral fracture incidence. Bone 16:257S–262SPubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sone T, Tomomitsu T, Miyake M et al (1997) Age-related changes in vertebral height ratios and vertebral fracture. Osteoporosis Int 7:113–118CrossRef Sone T, Tomomitsu T, Miyake M et al (1997) Age-related changes in vertebral height ratios and vertebral fracture. Osteoporosis Int 7:113–118CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Vega E, Ghiringhelli G, Mautalen C et al (1998) Bone mineral density and bone size in men with primary osteoporosis and vertebral fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 62:465–469PubMedCrossRef Vega E, Ghiringhelli G, Mautalen C et al (1998) Bone mineral density and bone size in men with primary osteoporosis and vertebral fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 62:465–469PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Duan Y, Parfitt A, Seeman E (1999) Vertebral bone mass, size, and volumetric density in women with spinal fractures. J Bone Miner Res 14:1796–1802PubMedCrossRef Duan Y, Parfitt A, Seeman E (1999) Vertebral bone mass, size, and volumetric density in women with spinal fractures. J Bone Miner Res 14:1796–1802PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Link TM, Doren M, Lewing G et al (2000) Cross-sectional area of lumbar vertebrae in peri- and postmenopausal patients with and without osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int 11:304–309CrossRef Link TM, Doren M, Lewing G et al (2000) Cross-sectional area of lumbar vertebrae in peri- and postmenopausal patients with and without osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int 11:304–309CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Seeman E, Duan Y, Fong C, Edmonds J (2001) Fracture site-specific deficits in bone size and volumetric density in men with spine or hip fractures. Bone Miner Res 16:120–127CrossRef Seeman E, Duan Y, Fong C, Edmonds J (2001) Fracture site-specific deficits in bone size and volumetric density in men with spine or hip fractures. Bone Miner Res 16:120–127CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Deng HW, Xu FH, Davies KM et al (2002) Differences in bone mineral density, bone mineral content, and bone areal size in fracturing and non-fracturing women, and their interrelationships at the spine and hip. J Bone Miner Metab 20:358–366PubMedCrossRef Deng HW, Xu FH, Davies KM et al (2002) Differences in bone mineral density, bone mineral content, and bone areal size in fracturing and non-fracturing women, and their interrelationships at the spine and hip. J Bone Miner Metab 20:358–366PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Biggemann M, Hilweg D, Brinckmann P (1988) Prediction of the compressive strength of vertebral bodies of the lumbar spine by quantitative computed tomography. Skeletal Radiol 17:264–269PubMedCrossRef Biggemann M, Hilweg D, Brinckmann P (1988) Prediction of the compressive strength of vertebral bodies of the lumbar spine by quantitative computed tomography. Skeletal Radiol 17:264–269PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Edmondston SJ, Singer KP, Day RE et al (1997) Ex vivo estimation of thoracolumbar vertebral body compressive strength: the relative contributions of bone densitometry and vertebral morphometry. Osteoporosis Int 7:142–148CrossRef Edmondston SJ, Singer KP, Day RE et al (1997) Ex vivo estimation of thoracolumbar vertebral body compressive strength: the relative contributions of bone densitometry and vertebral morphometry. Osteoporosis Int 7:142–148CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Johnell O, O’Neill T, Felsenberg D et al (1997) Anthropometric measurement and vertebral deformities. European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (EVOS) Group. Am J Epidemiol 146:287–293PubMed Johnell O, O’Neill T, Felsenberg D et al (1997) Anthropometric measurement and vertebral deformities. European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (EVOS) Group. Am J Epidemiol 146:287–293PubMed
29.
go back to reference Carter DR, Bouxsein ML, Marcus R (1992) New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data. J Bone Miner Res 7:137–145PubMedCrossRef Carter DR, Bouxsein ML, Marcus R (1992) New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data. J Bone Miner Res 7:137–145PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Seeman E, Hopper JL, Bach LA et al (1989) Reduced bone mass in daughters of women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 320:554–558PubMedCrossRef Seeman E, Hopper JL, Bach LA et al (1989) Reduced bone mass in daughters of women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 320:554–558PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Mosekilde L (1989) Sex differences in age-related loss of vertebral trabecular bone mass and structure biomechanical consequences. Bone 10:425–432PubMedCrossRef Mosekilde L (1989) Sex differences in age-related loss of vertebral trabecular bone mass and structure biomechanical consequences. Bone 10:425–432PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Vertebral dimensions as risk factor of vertebral fracture in osteoporotic patients: a systematic literature review
Authors
A. Ruyssen-Witrand
L. Gossec
S. Kolta
M. Dougados
C. Roux
Publication date
01-09-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 9/2007
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-007-0356-6

Other articles of this Issue 9/2007

Osteoporosis International 9/2007 Go to the issue