Top

Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

Published in:

07-09-2022 | Brief report

Verification of the Goldilocks Hypothesis: the association between screen use, digital media and psychiatric symptoms in the Growing Up in Ireland study

Authors: Ross Brannigan, Frances Cronin, Olivia McEvoy, Debbi Stanistreet, Richard Layte

Published in: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology | Issue 8/2023

Abstract

Aims

This study aims to replicate Przybylski and Weinstein (Psychol Sci 28(2):204–215, 2017), using a large population cohort to examine the validity of the proposed Goldilocks Hypothesis, which states that moderate digital media engagement may be beneficial and that both high and low usage may have a negative relationship with mental wellbeing.

Methods

Using the GUI98 cohort, we used separate weekday and weekend time-based categorical variables indicating time spent online, playing video games, watching TV/films as well as a frequency variable indicating multiscreening, and their associations with SDQ internalizing and externalizing symptoms using linear and quadratic regression parameters. We followed procedures for confounder adjustments outlined in Przybylski and Weinstein (Psychol Sci 28(2):204–215, 2017).

Results

As hypothesized by the Goldilocks Hypothesis, time spent online watching TV/films at the weekend and multiscreening all had curvilinear relationships with internalizing and externalizing symptoms with significantly higher symptoms for no time as well as for higher exposures. internalizing and externalizing symptoms increased with time spent playing video games.

Conclusions

This brief report supports the Goldilocks Hypothesis, that suggests that moderate use of digital technology is not intrinsically harmful and may instead be beneficial, even necessary in a world becoming ever more increasingly reliant on digital media (Przybylski and Weinstein in Psychol Sci 28(2):204–215, 2017).

Coyne SM, Rogers AA, Zurcher JD, Stockdale L, Booth M (2020) Does time spent using social media impact mental health? An eight year longitudinal study. Comput Hum Behav 1(104):106160CrossRef

Ferguson CJ, Kaye LK, Branley-Bell D, Markey P, Ivory JD, Klisanin D, Elson M, Smyth M, Hogg JL, McDonnell D, Nichols D (2021) Like this meta-analysis: Screen media and mental health. Prof Psychol Res Pract. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000426CrossRef

Dienlin T, Johannes N (2020) The impact of digital technology use on adolescent well-being. Dialog Clin Neurosci 22(2):135CrossRef

Odgers CL, Jensen MR (2020) Annual research review: adolescent mental health in the digital age: facts, fears, and future directions. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 61(3):336–348CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Best P, Manktelow R, Taylor B (2014) Online communication, social media and adolescent wellbeing: a systematic narrative review. Child Youth Serv Rev 1(41):27–36CrossRef

Masur PK (2021) Digital communication effects on loneliness and life satisfaction. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication.

Kleemans M, Daalmans S, Carbaat I, Anschütz D (2018) Picture perfect: the direct effect of manipulated Instagram photos on body image in adolescent girls. Media Psychol 21(1):93–110CrossRef

Przybylski AK, Weinstein N (2017) A large-scale test of the Goldilocks Hypothesis: quantifying the relations between digital-screen use and the mental well-being of adolescents. Psychol Sci 28(2):204–215CrossRefPubMed

Neuman SB (1988) The displacement effect: assessing the relation between television viewing and reading performance. Read Res Q 1:414–440CrossRef

10.

Fox J, Moreland JJ (2015) The dark side of social networking sites: an exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances. Comput Hum Behav 1(45):168–176CrossRef

11.

Lee SY (2014) How do people compare themselves with others on social network sites? The case of Facebook. Comput Hum Behav 1(32):253–260CrossRef

12.

Przybylski AK, Orben A, Weinstein N (2020) How much is too much? Examining the relationship between digital screen engagement and psychosocial functioning in a confirmatory cohort study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 59(9):1080–1088CrossRefPubMed

13.

McCrae N, Gettings S, Purssell E (2017) Social media and depressive symptoms in childhood and adolescence: a systematic review. Adolesc Res Rev 2(4):315–330

14.

Murray A, McCrory C, Thornton M, Williams J, Quail A, Swords L, Doyle E, Harris H (2022) Growing up in Ireland: design, instrumentation and procedures for the child cohort (at 9 years). Department of Children and Youth Affairs, Dublin

15.

Thornton M, Williams J, McCrory C, Murray A, Quail A (2016) Growing up in Ireland: design, instrumentation and procedures for the child cohort at wave two (13 years). Department of Children and Youth Affair, Dublin

16.

Murphy D, Willians J, Murray A, Smyth E (2022) Growing up in Ireland: design, instrumentation and procedures for cohort ’98 at 17/18 years of age. Department of Children and Youth Affairs, Dublin

17.

Goodman A, Lamping DL, Ploubidis GB (2010) When to use broader internalising and externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ): data from British parents, teachers and children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 38(8):1179–1191CrossRefPubMed

18.

Robitzsch A (2020) Why ordinal variables can (almost) always be treated as continuous variables: clarifying assumptions of robust continuous and ordinal factor analysis estimation methods. Front Educat 5:589965CrossRef

19.

Koskelainen M, Sourander A, Kaljonen A (2000) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire among finnish school-aged children and adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 9(4):277–284CrossRefPubMed

20.

Goodman R (2001) Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 40(11):1337–1345CrossRefPubMed

21.

Brannigan R, Gil-Hernández CJ, McEvoy O, Cronin F, Stanistreet D, Layte R (2022) Digital engagement and its association with adverse psychiatric symptoms: a longitudinal cohort study utilizing latent class analysis. Comput Hum Behav 1(133):107290CrossRef

Title: Verification of the Goldilocks Hypothesis: the association between screen use, digital media and psychiatric symptoms in the Growing Up in Ireland study
Authors: Ross Brannigan
Frances Cronin
Olivia McEvoy
Debbi Stanistreet
Richard Layte
Publication date: 07-09-2022
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology / Issue 8/2023
Print ISSN: 0933-7954
Electronic ISSN: 1433-9285
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-022-02352-5

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Verification of the Goldilocks Hypothesis: the association between screen use, digital media and psychiatric symptoms in the Growing Up in Ireland study

Abstract

Aims

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Aims

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 8/2023

Weighing psychosocial factors in relatives for the risk of psychopathology: a study of patients with depressive and anxiety disorders and their siblings

The shattered “Iron Rice Bowl”: effects of Chinese state-owned enterprise reform on depressive symptoms in later life

Trajectories of generalized anxiety disorder, major depression and change in quality of life in adults aged 50 + : findings from a longitudinal analysis using representative, population-based data from Ireland

Self-harm and rurality in Canada: an analysis of hospitalization data from 2015 to 2019

Preconception factors associated with postnatal mental health and suicidality among first-time fathers: results from an Australian Longitudinal Study of Men’s Health

Acculturation and suicide-related risk in ethnoracially minoritized youth in the US: a scoping review and content analysis of the empirical evidence