Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2007

01-10-2007 | Breast Oncology

Variation in the Use of Percutaneous Biopsy for Diagnosis of Breast Abnormalities in Ontario

Authors: Claire M. B. Holloway, MD, PhD, FRCSC, Refik Saskin, MSc, Muriel Brackstone, MD, FRCSC, Lawrence Paszat, MD, MSc, FRCPC

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 10/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Preoperative diagnosis of breast abnormalities is currently the standard of care. A population-based study to determine the use of percutaneous needle biopsy for breast diagnosis in Ontario was performed.

Methods

A total of 17,068 women undergoing breast tissue sampling (percutaneous needle biopsy or surgical excision) for diagnosis between April 1, 2002, and December 31, 2002, and without a previous cancer diagnosis were identified. Univariate and multivariate analyses examined the association of age, residence in a particular local health integration network (LHIN), income quintile, urban or rural residence, primary care provider, any prior mammogram, and prior regular screening mammography, as well as whether the biopsy was initiated by a screening mammogram with different methods of tissue diagnosis.

Results

A total of 10,459 women (61%) underwent percutaneous biopsy for diagnosis. A total of 10,131 women underwent surgery, of whom 6637 received a benign diagnosis and 3494 had cancer, for a benign-to-malignant ratio of 1.9:1. Women with cancer were slightly more likely to undergo percutaneous biopsy than women without (64.7% vs. 60.3%). There was variation among LHINs in the use of percutaneous biopsy (range, 24%–72%). Women with the highest incomes, urban residence, a primary care provider, or history of any prior mammography were more likely to receive percutaneous biopsy. On multivariate analysis, age 50 to 69 years, LHIN, urban residence, primary care provider, and screen-initiated evaluation were associated with percutaneous biopsy.

Conclusions

Variation in the use of percutaneous biopsy by factors unrelated to indications for biopsy indicate that strategies to identify and overcome barriers to its use are needed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rubin E, Mennemeyer ST, Desmond RA, et al. Reducing the cost of diagnosis of breast carcinoma: impact of ultrasound and imaging-guided biopsies on a clinical breast practice. Cancer 2001;91:324–32PubMedCrossRef Rubin E, Mennemeyer ST, Desmond RA, et al. Reducing the cost of diagnosis of breast carcinoma: impact of ultrasound and imaging-guided biopsies on a clinical breast practice. Cancer 2001;91:324–32PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Nuffield Institute for Health, ed. The Management of Primary Breast Cancer. University of Leeds and NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination No. 2. University of York Effective Health Care, 1996 Nuffield Institute for Health, ed. The Management of Primary Breast Cancer. University of Leeds and NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination No. 2. University of York Effective Health Care, 1996
3.
go back to reference Berner A, Davidson B, Sigstad E, Risberg B. Fine-needle aspiration cytology vs core biopsy in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 2003;29:344–8PubMedCrossRef Berner A, Davidson B, Sigstad E, Risberg B. Fine-needle aspiration cytology vs core biopsy in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 2003;29:344–8PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Masood S. Occult breast lesions and aspiration biopsy: a new challenge. Diagn Cytopathol 1993;9:613–4PubMedCrossRef Masood S. Occult breast lesions and aspiration biopsy: a new challenge. Diagn Cytopathol 1993;9:613–4PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wilkinson EJ, Masood S. Stereotactic imaging and breast biopsy. In: Bland KI, Copeland EM, eds. The Breast: Comprehensive Management of Benign and Malignant Diseases. Vol 36, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1998:698–735 Wilkinson EJ, Masood S. Stereotactic imaging and breast biopsy. In: Bland KI, Copeland EM, eds. The Breast: Comprehensive Management of Benign and Malignant Diseases. Vol 36, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1998:698–735
6.
go back to reference White RR, Halperin TJ, Olson JA Jr, Soo MS, Bentley RC, Seigler HF. Impact of core-needle breast biopsy on the surgical management of mammographic abnormalities. Ann Surg 2001;233:769–77PubMedCrossRef White RR, Halperin TJ, Olson JA Jr, Soo MS, Bentley RC, Seigler HF. Impact of core-needle breast biopsy on the surgical management of mammographic abnormalities. Ann Surg 2001;233:769–77PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994;193:359–64PubMed Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994;193:359–64PubMed
8.
go back to reference Kaye MD, Vicinanza-Adami CA, Sullivan ML. Mammographic findings after stereotaxic biopsy of the breast performed with large-core needles. Radiology 1994;192:149–51PubMed Kaye MD, Vicinanza-Adami CA, Sullivan ML. Mammographic findings after stereotaxic biopsy of the breast performed with large-core needles. Radiology 1994;192:149–51PubMed
9.
go back to reference Fuhrman GM, Cederbom GJ, Bolton JS, et al. Image-guided core-needle breast biopsy is an accurate technique to evaluate patients with nonpalpable imaging abnormalities. Ann Surg 1998;227:932–9PubMedCrossRef Fuhrman GM, Cederbom GJ, Bolton JS, et al. Image-guided core-needle breast biopsy is an accurate technique to evaluate patients with nonpalpable imaging abnormalities. Ann Surg 1998;227:932–9PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Verkooijen, Helena M, and the Core Biopsy After Radiological Localisation (COBRA) Study Group. Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: results of a multicenter prospective study with 95% surgical confirmation. Int J Cancer 2002;99:853–9 Verkooijen, Helena M, and the Core Biopsy After Radiological Localisation (COBRA) Study Group. Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: results of a multicenter prospective study with 95% surgical confirmation. Int J Cancer 2002;99:853–9
11.
go back to reference Soo MS, Baker JA, Rosen EL. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:941–8PubMed Soo MS, Baker JA, Rosen EL. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:941–8PubMed
12.
go back to reference Whitten TM, Wallace TW, Bird RE, Turk PS. Image-guided core biopsy has advantages over needle localization biopsy for the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer. Am Surg 1997;63:1072–7PubMed Whitten TM, Wallace TW, Bird RE, Turk PS. Image-guided core biopsy has advantages over needle localization biopsy for the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer. Am Surg 1997;63:1072–7PubMed
13.
go back to reference Yim JH, Barton P, Weber B, et al. Mammographically detected breast cancer: benefits of stereotactic core versus wire localization biopsy. Ann Surg 1996;223:688–700PubMedCrossRef Yim JH, Barton P, Weber B, et al. Mammographically detected breast cancer: benefits of stereotactic core versus wire localization biopsy. Ann Surg 1996;223:688–700PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Smith DN, Christian R, Meyer JE. Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast cancers: the impact on subsequent surgical excisions. Arch Surg 1997;132:256–9PubMed Smith DN, Christian R, Meyer JE. Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast cancers: the impact on subsequent surgical excisions. Arch Surg 1997;132:256–9PubMed
15.
go back to reference Bevers TB, Anderson BO, Bonaccio E, et al. Breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2006;4:480–508PubMed Bevers TB, Anderson BO, Bonaccio E, et al. Breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2006;4:480–508PubMed
16.
go back to reference McCready D, Holloway C, Shelley W, et al. Surgical management of early stage invasive breast cancer: a practice guideline. Can J Surg 2005;48:185–94PubMed McCready D, Holloway C, Shelley W, et al. Surgical management of early stage invasive breast cancer: a practice guideline. Can J Surg 2005;48:185–94PubMed
17.
go back to reference Jackman RJ, Marzoni FA Jr. Needle-localized breast biopsy: why do we fail? Radiology 1997;204:677–84PubMed Jackman RJ, Marzoni FA Jr. Needle-localized breast biopsy: why do we fail? Radiology 1997;204:677–84PubMed
18.
go back to reference Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994;193:359–64PubMed Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994;193:359–64PubMed
19.
go back to reference Al-Sobhi SS, Helvie MA, Pass HA, Chang AE. Extent of lumpectomy for breast cancer after diagnosis by stereotactic core versus wire localization biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:330–5PubMedCrossRef Al-Sobhi SS, Helvie MA, Pass HA, Chang AE. Extent of lumpectomy for breast cancer after diagnosis by stereotactic core versus wire localization biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:330–5PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Butler WM, Cunningham JE, Bull D, et al. Breast cancer care: changing community standards. J Healthcare Qual 2004;26:22–8 Butler WM, Cunningham JE, Bull D, et al. Breast cancer care: changing community standards. J Healthcare Qual 2004;26:22–8
21.
go back to reference Morrow M, Venta L, Stinson T, Bennett C. Prospective comparison of stereotactic core biopsy and surgical excision as diagnostic procedures for breast cancer patients. Ann Surg 2001;233:537–41PubMedCrossRef Morrow M, Venta L, Stinson T, Bennett C. Prospective comparison of stereotactic core biopsy and surgical excision as diagnostic procedures for breast cancer patients. Ann Surg 2001;233:537–41PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lind DS, Minter R, Steinbach B, et al. Stereotactic core biopsy reduces the reexcision rate and the cost of mammographically detected cancer. J Surg Res 1998;78:23–6PubMedCrossRef Lind DS, Minter R, Steinbach B, et al. Stereotactic core biopsy reduces the reexcision rate and the cost of mammographically detected cancer. J Surg Res 1998;78:23–6PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Olivotto IA, Kan L, King S. Waiting for a diagnosis after an abnormal screeening mammogram. Can J Public Health 2000;91:113–7PubMed Olivotto IA, Kan L, King S. Waiting for a diagnosis after an abnormal screeening mammogram. Can J Public Health 2000;91:113–7PubMed
24.
go back to reference Beaulieu J, Galland J, Fleming S, Chen K, Peng X. Geographic variation in breast-conserving surgery in Kentucky’s Medicare population. J Ky Med Assoc 2002;100:99–103PubMed Beaulieu J, Galland J, Fleming S, Chen K, Peng X. Geographic variation in breast-conserving surgery in Kentucky’s Medicare population. J Ky Med Assoc 2002;100:99–103PubMed
25.
go back to reference Craft PS, Primrose JG, Lindner JA, McManus PR. Surgical management of breast cancer in Australian women in 1993: analysis of Medicare statistics. Med J Aust 1997;166:626–9PubMed Craft PS, Primrose JG, Lindner JA, McManus PR. Surgical management of breast cancer in Australian women in 1993: analysis of Medicare statistics. Med J Aust 1997;166:626–9PubMed
26.
go back to reference Laliberte L, Fennell ML, Papandonatos G. The relationship of membership in research networks to compliance with treatment guidelines for early-stage breast cancer. Med Care 2005;43:471–9PubMedCrossRef Laliberte L, Fennell ML, Papandonatos G. The relationship of membership in research networks to compliance with treatment guidelines for early-stage breast cancer. Med Care 2005;43:471–9PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Variation in the Use of Percutaneous Biopsy for Diagnosis of Breast Abnormalities in Ontario
Authors
Claire M. B. Holloway, MD, PhD, FRCSC
Refik Saskin, MSc
Muriel Brackstone, MD, FRCSC
Lawrence Paszat, MD, MSc, FRCPC
Publication date
01-10-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 10/2007
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9362-3

Other articles of this Issue 10/2007

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2007 Go to the issue