Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Virchows Archiv
Published in: Virchows Archiv 2/2017

01-02-2017 | Original Article

Value of postmortem studies in deceased neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit patients

Authors: Raphael Widmann, Rosmarie Caduff, Luca Giudici, Qing Zhong, Alexander Vogetseder, Romaine Arlettaz, Bernhard Frey, Holger Moch, Peter K. Bode

Published in: Virchows Archiv | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Worldwide, various autopsy studies have shown a decrease in the diagnostic error rate over the last years. The cause of this positive development is mainly due to the improvement of modern medicine. However, intensive care unit patients are thought to have a higher risk for diagnostic errors, which is documented in several studies in the adult population. In contrast, there is only limited information about diagnostic errors in pediatrics, particularly in pediatric and neonatal intensive care units. The aims of this study were to analyze the spectrum of childhood death, determine the prevalence and distribution of autopsy-confirmed diagnostic errors, and describe patient characteristics that might have influenced the discordance between antemortem and postmortem findings. We analyzed 143 autopsy reports from 2004 to 2013 and correlated these with clinical reports. The overall autopsy rate during this interval was 20.3%. The leading causes of death were congenital malformations (28%), diseases closely associated with perinatal disorders (25%), disorders of the cardiovascular system (18%), and infections (15%). Additional findings were obtained in 23% of the autopsies. Major diagnostic errors were found in 6%, the lowest reported value in a developed country as yet. Most cases (75%) showed complete concordance between clinical diagnoses and postmortem findings, in line with improvements in diagnostic and therapeutic processes over the last decades. In conclusion, autopsy of neonates, infants, and children represents an important tool for monitoring the quality of pediatric and neonatal medical care.
Literature
1.
2.
Anonymous 2014 Death and its main causes in Switzerland In: Swiss Federal Statistical Office, Neuchâtel
3.
Barr P, Hunt R (1999) An evaluation of the autopsy following death in a level IV neonatal intensive care unit. J Paediatr Child Health 35:185–189CrossRefPubMed
4.
Battle RM, Pathak D, Humble CG et al (1987) Factors influencing discrepancies between premortem and postmortem diagnoses. JAMA 258:339–344CrossRefPubMed
5.
Bellwald M (1982) Autopsies with unsatisfactory results. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 112:75–82PubMed
6.
Bode PK, Cathomas G, Vogt P et al (2014) Clinical autopsy. Praxis (Bern 1994) 103:65–69 quiz 70-61CrossRef
7.
Breeze AC, Statham H, Hackett GA et al (2012) Perinatal postmortems: what is important to parents and how do they decide? Birth 39:57–64CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
Chariot P, Witt K, Pautot V et al (2000) Declining autopsy rate in a French hospital: physician’s attitudes to the autopsy and use of autopsy material in research publications. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124:739–745PubMed
10.
Cifra CL, Jones KL, Ascenzi JA et al (2015) Diagnostic errors in a PICU: insights from the morbidity and mortality conference. Pediatr Crit Care Med 16:468–476CrossRefPubMed
11.
Cohen MC, Paley MN, Griffiths PD et al (2008) Less invasive autopsy: benefits and limitations of the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the perinatal postmortem. Pediatr Dev Pathol 11:1–9CrossRefPubMed
12.
Combes A, Mokhtari M, Couvelard A et al (2004) Clinical and autopsy diagnoses in the intensive care unit: a prospective study. Arch Intern Med 164:389–392CrossRefPubMed
13.
Craft H, Brazy JE (1986) Autopsy. High yield in neonatal population. Am J Dis Child 140:1260–1262CrossRefPubMed
14.
Custer JW, Winters BD, Goode V et al (2015) Diagnostic errors in the pediatric and neonatal ICU: a systematic review. Pediatr Crit Care Med 16:29–36CrossRefPubMed
15.
Dewar S, Boddington P (2004) Returning to the Alder Hey report and its reporting: addressing confusions and improving inquiries. J Med Ethics 30:463–469CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
17.
Frey B, Doell C, Klauwer D et al. (2015) The morbidity and mortality conference in pediatric intensive care as a means for improving patient safety. Pediatr Crit Care Med
18.
Frohlich S, Ryan O, Murphy N et al (2014) Are autopsy findings still relevant to the management of critically ill patients in the modern era? Crit Care Med 42:336–343CrossRefPubMed
19.
Goldman L, Sayson R, Robbins S et al (1983) The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. N Engl J Med 308:1000–1005CrossRefPubMed
20.
Goldstein B, Metlay L, Cox C et al (1996) Association of pre mortem diagnosis and autopsy findings in pediatric intensive care unit versus emergency department versus ward patients. Crit Care Med 24:683–686CrossRefPubMed
21.
Graber ML, Franklin N, Gordon R (2005) Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Arch Intern Med 165:1493–1499CrossRefPubMed
22.
Karim JN, Roberts NW, Salomon LJ et al. (2016) Systematic review of first trimester ultrasound screening in detecting fetal structural anomalies and factors affecting screening performance. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
23.
Khong T, Malcomsen R (2015) Keeling’s fetal and neonatal pathology. Springer
24.
Kumar P, Angst DB, Taxy J et al (2000) Neonatal autopsies: a 10-year experience. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 154:38–42PubMed
25.
Landers S, Macpherson T (1995) Prevalence of the neonatal autopsy: a report of the study group for complications of perinatal care. Pediatr Pathol Lab Med 15:539–545CrossRefPubMed
26.
Langston C, Dishop MK (2009) Diffuse lung disease in infancy: a proposed classification applied to 259 diagnostic biopsies. Pediatr Dev Pathol 12:421–437CrossRefPubMed
27.
Laux D, Malan V, Bajolle F et al (2013) FOX gene cluster defects in alveolar capillary dysplasia associated with congenital heart disease. Cardiol Young 23:697–704CrossRefPubMed
28.
Loughrey MB, Mccluggage WG, Toner PG (2000) The declining autopsy rate and clinicians’ attitudes. Ulster Med J 69:83–89PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
30.
Manegold-Brauer G, Kang Bellin A, Hahn S et al (2014) A new era in prenatal care: non-invasive prenatal testing in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly 144:w13915PubMed
31.
Maniscalco WM, Clarke TA (1982) Factors influencing neonatal autopsy rate. Am J Dis Child 136:781–784PubMed
32.
33.
Mudher A-A (2014) Perinatal autopsy, techniques and classifications. In: Cohen MC, Scheimberg I (eds) The pediatric and perinatal autopsy manual. Cambridge University Press
34.
Newman-Toker DE, Pronovost PJ (2009) Diagnostic errors—the next frontier for patient safety. JAMA 301:1060–1062CrossRefPubMed
35.
Ruegger CM, Bartsch C, Martinez RM et al (2014) Minimally invasive, imaging guided virtual autopsy compared to conventional autopsy in foetal, newborn and infant cases: study protocol for the paediatric virtual autopsy trial. BMC Pediatr 14:15CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Schwanda-Burger S, Moch H, Muntwyler J et al (2012) Diagnostic errors in the new millennium: a follow-up autopsy study. Mod Pathol 25:777–783CrossRefPubMed
37.
38.
39.
Sonderegger-Iseli K, Burger S, Muntwyler J et al (2000) Diagnostic errors in three medical eras: a necropsy study. Lancet 355:2027–2031CrossRefPubMed
40.
Stambouly JJ, Kahn E, Boxer RA (1993) Correlation between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in critically ill children. Pediatrics 92:248–251PubMed
41.
Stankiewicz P, Sen P, Bhatt SS et al (2009) Genomic and genic deletions of the FOX gene cluster on 16q24.1 and inactivating mutations of FOXF1 cause alveolar capillary dysplasia and other malformations. Am J Hum Genet 84:780–791CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Swinton CH, Weiner J, Okah FA (2013) The neonatal autopsy: can it be revived? Am J Perinatol 30:739–744CrossRefPubMed
43.
44.
Thammasitboon S, Thammasitboon S, Singhal G (2013) Diagnosing diagnostic error. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 43:227–231CrossRefPubMed
45.
Thayyil S, Sebire NJ, Chitty LS et al (2013) Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study. Lancet 382:223–233CrossRefPubMed
46.
Thurnheer R, Hoess C, Doenecke C et al (2009) Diagnostic performance in a primary referral hospital assessed by autopsy: evolution over a ten-year period. Eur J Intern Med 20:784–787CrossRefPubMed
47.
48.
Von Dessauer B, Velozo L, Benavente C et al (2011) Postmortem studies in the contemporary pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med 12:617–621CrossRefPubMed
49.
Whitby EH, Offiah AC, Cohen MC (2015) Initial experiences of a minimally invasive autopsy service. A report of the techniques and observations in the first 11 cases. Pediatr Dev Pathol 18:24–29CrossRefPubMed
50.
Winters B, Custer J, Galvagno SM Jr et al (2012) Diagnostic errors in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of autopsy studies. BMJ Qual Saf 21:894–902CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Value of postmortem studies in deceased neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit patients
Authors
Raphael Widmann
Rosmarie Caduff
Luca Giudici
Qing Zhong
Alexander Vogetseder
Romaine Arlettaz
Bernhard Frey
Holger Moch
Peter K. Bode
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Virchows Archiv / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0945-6317
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2307
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-016-2056-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Virchows Archiv 2/2017 Go to the issue

Original Article

CXCL12 expression and PD-L1 expression serve as prognostic biomarkers in HCC and are induced by hypoxia

Original Article

The enteric nervous system and the musculature of the colon are altered in patients with spina bifida and spinal cord injury

Erratum

Erratum to: Abstracts

Original Article

Prognostic impact of HER3 based on protein and mRNA expression in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma

Review and Perspectives

Ovarian borderline tumors in the 2014 WHO classification: evolving concepts and diagnostic criteria

Original Article

Ki-67 labeling index of neuroendocrine tumors of the lung has a high level of correspondence between biopsy samples and surgical specimens when strict counting guidelines are applied