Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 6/2006

01-06-2006 | Original Article

Validity and interobserver agreement of a new radiographic grading system for intervertebral disc degeneration: Part II. Cervical spine

Authors: Annette Kettler, Friederike Rohlmann, Cornelia Neidlinger-Wilke, Karin Werner, Lutz Claes, Hans-Joachim Wilke

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 6/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

A new radiographic grading system for a more objective assessment of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration has been described and tested in Part I of this study. The aim of the present Part II of the study was to adapt this system to the cervical spine, and to test it for validity and interobserver agreement. Some modifications of the grading system described in Part I were necessary to make it applicable to the cervical spine. Its basic structure, however, stayed untouched. The three variables “Height Loss”, “Osteophyte Formation” and “Diffuse Sclerosis” first have to be graded individually. Then, the “Overall Degree of Degeneration” is assigned on a four-point scale from 0 (no degeneration) to 3 (severe degeneration). For validation, the radiographic degrees of degeneration of 28 cervical discs were compared to the respective macroscopic ones, which were defined as “real” degrees of degeneration. The interobserver agreement was determined between one experienced and one unexperienced observer using the radiographs of 57 cervical discs. Quadratic weighted Kappa coefficients (κ) with 95% confidence limits (95% CL) were used for statistical evaluation. The validation of the new version of the radiographic grading system showed a moderate agreement with the “real”, macroscopic overall degree of degeneration (κ=0.599, 95% CL 0.421–0.786). In 64% of all discs the “real” overall degree of degeneration was underestimated but never overestimated. This underestimation, however, was much less pronounced and the Kappa coefficients were significantly higher for the three variables: Height Loss, Osteophyte Formation, and Diffuse Sclerosis separately. The agreement between the radiographic ratings of the experienced and the unexperienced observer was substantial for the overall degree of degeneration (κ=0.688, 95% CL 0.580–0.796), almost perfect for the variable, Height Loss, moderate for Osteophyte Formation and fair for Diffuse Sclerosis. In conclusion, we believe that the new version of the radiographic grading system is a sufficiently valid and reliable tool to quantify the degree of degeneration of individual cervical intervertebral discs. In comparison to the version for the lumbar spine described in Part I, however, a slightly higher tendency to underestimate the “real” overall degree of degeneration and somewhat higher interobserver differences have to be expected.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Benneker LM, Heini PF, Anderson SE, Alini M, Ito K (2005) Correlation of radiographic and MRI parameters to morphological and biochemical assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 14(1):27–35CrossRefPubMed Benneker LM, Heini PF, Anderson SE, Alini M, Ito K (2005) Correlation of radiographic and MRI parameters to morphological and biochemical assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 14(1):27–35CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Brooker AE, Barter RW (1965) Cervical spondylosis. a clinical study with comparative radiology. Brain 88(5):925–936PubMed Brooker AE, Barter RW (1965) Cervical spondylosis. a clinical study with comparative radiology. Brain 88(5):925–936PubMed
3.
go back to reference Collins DH (1949) The pathology of articular and spinal diseases. Edward Arnold & Co, London Collins DH (1949) The pathology of articular and spinal diseases. Edward Arnold & Co, London
4.
go back to reference Cote P, Cassidy JD, Yong-Hing K, Sibley J, Loewy J (1997) Apophysial joint degeneration, disc degeneration, and sagittal curve of the cervical spine. Can they be measured reliably on radiographs? Spine 22(8):859–864CrossRefPubMed Cote P, Cassidy JD, Yong-Hing K, Sibley J, Loewy J (1997) Apophysial joint degeneration, disc degeneration, and sagittal curve of the cervical spine. Can they be measured reliably on radiographs? Spine 22(8):859–864CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Fleiss J, Cohen J (1973) The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas 33:613–619 Fleiss J, Cohen J (1973) The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas 33:613–619
6.
go back to reference Friedenberg ZB, Miller WT (1963) Degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 45:1171–1178PubMed Friedenberg ZB, Miller WT (1963) Degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 45:1171–1178PubMed
7.
go back to reference Frobin W, Leivseth G, Biggemann M, Brinckmann P (2002) Vertebral height, disc height, posteroanterior displacement and dens-atlas gap in the cervical spine: precision measurement protocol and normal data. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 17(6):423–431 Frobin W, Leivseth G, Biggemann M, Brinckmann P (2002) Vertebral height, disc height, posteroanterior displacement and dens-atlas gap in the cervical spine: precision measurement protocol and normal data. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 17(6):423–431
8.
go back to reference Fujiwara A, Lim TH, An HS, et al. (2000) The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 25(23):3036–3044CrossRefPubMed Fujiwara A, Lim TH, An HS, et al. (2000) The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 25(23):3036–3044CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hirsch C (1972) Some morphological changes in the cervical spine during ageing. In: Hirsch C, Zotterman Y (eds) Cervical pain. Pergamon, New York, pp 21–32 Hirsch C (1972) Some morphological changes in the cervical spine during ageing. In: Hirsch C, Zotterman Y (eds) Cervical pain. Pergamon, New York, pp 21–32
10.
go back to reference Kellgren JH, Jeffrey MR, Ball J (1963) The epidemiology of chronic rheumatism. Vol. II: Atlas of standard radiographs of arthritis. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 14–19 Kellgren JH, Jeffrey MR, Ball J (1963) The epidemiology of chronic rheumatism. Vol. II: Atlas of standard radiographs of arthritis. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 14–19
11.
go back to reference Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1952) Rheumatism in miners. II. X-ray study. Br J Ind Med 9(3):197–207PubMed Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1952) Rheumatism in miners. II. X-ray study. Br J Ind Med 9(3):197–207PubMed
12.
go back to reference Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16(4):494–502PubMed Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16(4):494–502PubMed
13.
go back to reference Kettler A and Wilke H-J (2005) Review of existing grading systems for cervical and lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration. Eur Spine J (accepted) Kettler A and Wilke H-J (2005) Review of existing grading systems for cervical and lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration. Eur Spine J (accepted)
14.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174PubMed Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174PubMed
15.
go back to reference Lehto IJ, Tertti MO, Komu ME, Paajanen HE, Tuominen J, Kormano MJ (1994) Age-related MRI changes at 0.1 T in cervical discs in asymptomatic subjects. Neuroradiology 36(1):49–53CrossRefPubMed Lehto IJ, Tertti MO, Komu ME, Paajanen HE, Tuominen J, Kormano MJ (1994) Age-related MRI changes at 0.1 T in cervical discs in asymptomatic subjects. Neuroradiology 36(1):49–53CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 26(17):1873–8CrossRefPubMed Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 26(17):1873–8CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference SAS (1999) SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA SAS (1999) SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA
19.
go back to reference Schellhas KP, Smith MD, Gundry CR, Pollei SR (1996) Cervical discogenic pain. Prospective correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and discography in asymptomatic subjects and pain sufferers. Spine 21(3):300–311; discussion 311–312CrossRefPubMed Schellhas KP, Smith MD, Gundry CR, Pollei SR (1996) Cervical discogenic pain. Prospective correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and discography in asymptomatic subjects and pain sufferers. Spine 21(3):300–311; discussion 311–312CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Schneiderman G, Flannigan B, Kingston S, Thomas J, Dillin WH, Watkins RG (1987) Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of disc degeneration: correlation with discography. Spine 12(3):276–281PubMed Schneiderman G, Flannigan B, Kingston S, Thomas J, Dillin WH, Watkins RG (1987) Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of disc degeneration: correlation with discography. Spine 12(3):276–281PubMed
21.
go back to reference Silberstein CE (1965) The evolution of degenerative changes in the cervical spine and an investigation into the “Joints of Luschka”. Clin Orthop 40:184–204PubMed Silberstein CE (1965) The evolution of degenerative changes in the cervical spine and an investigation into the “Joints of Luschka”. Clin Orthop 40:184–204PubMed
22.
go back to reference Tertti M, Paajanen H, Laato M, Aho H, Komu M, Kormano M (1991) Disc degeneration in magnetic resonance imaging. A comparative biochemical, histologic, and radiologic study in cadaver spines. Spine 16(6):629–634PubMed Tertti M, Paajanen H, Laato M, Aho H, Komu M, Kormano M (1991) Disc degeneration in magnetic resonance imaging. A comparative biochemical, histologic, and radiologic study in cadaver spines. Spine 16(6):629–634PubMed
23.
go back to reference Thompson JP, Pearce RH, Schechter MT, Adams ME, Tsang IK, Bishop PB (1990) Preliminary evaluation of a scheme for grading the gross morphology of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 15(5):411–415 Thompson JP, Pearce RH, Schechter MT, Adams ME, Tsang IK, Bishop PB (1990) Preliminary evaluation of a scheme for grading the gross morphology of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 15(5):411–415
24.
go back to reference Töndury G (1972) The behaviour of the cervical discs during life. In: Hirsch C, Zotterman Y (eds) Cervical pain. Pergamon, New York, pp 59–66 Töndury G (1972) The behaviour of the cervical discs during life. In: Hirsch C, Zotterman Y (eds) Cervical pain. Pergamon, New York, pp 59–66
25.
go back to reference Viikari-Juntura E, Raininko R, Videman T, Porkka L (1989) Evaluation of cervical disc degeneration with ultralow field MRI and discography. An experimental study on cadavers. Spine 14(6):616–619PubMed Viikari-Juntura E, Raininko R, Videman T, Porkka L (1989) Evaluation of cervical disc degeneration with ultralow field MRI and discography. An experimental study on cadavers. Spine 14(6):616–619PubMed
Metadata
Title
Validity and interobserver agreement of a new radiographic grading system for intervertebral disc degeneration: Part II. Cervical spine
Authors
Annette Kettler
Friederike Rohlmann
Cornelia Neidlinger-Wilke
Karin Werner
Lutz Claes
Hans-Joachim Wilke
Publication date
01-06-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 6/2006
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-1037-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2006

European Spine Journal 6/2006 Go to the issue