Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 12/2013

01-12-2013 | Original Article

Validation of the Simplified Chinese version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI)

Authors: Jun Qiao, Feng Zhu, Zezhang Zhu, Leilei Xu, Bin Wang, Yang Yu, Bang-Ping Qian, Yitao Ding, Yong Qiu

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 12/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To translate the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) into Simplified Chinese and then validate it for Mainland Chinese patients with low back pain (LBP).

Methods

A total of 120 consecutive patients with LBP >3 months who visited our outpatient clinic from December 2011 to March 2012 were asked to complete a questionnaire booklet including the following: (1) the Roland Morris disability questionnaire (RMQ) (Fan et al. in Spine 37(10):875–880, 2012), (2) the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) (Zhang et al. in Int J Med Sci 9(7):521–526, 2012), (3) the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (Liu et al. in Spine 34(11):1211–1216, 2009), (4) visual analogue scale (VAS) measure of pain, and (5) COMI. These patients were also asked to complete a second COMI questionnaire and a transition questionnaire (5-point Likert scale: better, a little better, no change, a little worse, worse) and to return the second COMI questionnaire via mail within 1 month.

Results

The floor effects for the COMI items ranged from 5.8 to 12.5 %. High values (28.3, 27.5, and 25.8 %, respectively) were found for symptom-specific quality of life, social disability, and work disability. Regarding the ceiling effects, the social and work disabilities were relatively high at 17.5 and 24.2 %, respectively. For other items, the values ranged from 0 to 14.2 %. Neither floor nor ceiling effects were found for the COMI summary score. Excellent correlations were found between the COMI pain scores and VAS scores (Rho = 0.89) and between the COMI pain and the SF-36 bodily pain domain (Rho = 0.84). Other individual items and summary scores showed a very good correlation (Rho = 0.54–0.72) with the corresponding questionnaires except for “symptom-specific well-being” (0.31–0.45). One-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The ICC for the entire COMI score was 0.91 (95 % CI 0.85–0.94) and 0.81–0.86 for the two pain scores (back and leg). The “minimum detectable change’’ (MDC 95 %) for the COMI summary score was 1.91 points. No significant difference in the mean values was found for the repeated scores of individual items or the summary score.

Conclusion

The Simplified Chinese version of COMI showed satisfactory reliability and good psychometric properties. This concise questionnaire is suitable for widespread use in Mainland China.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fan S, Hu Z, Hong H et al (2012) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine 37(10):875–880PubMedCrossRef Fan S, Hu Z, Hong H et al (2012) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine 37(10):875–880PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Qu B, Lun SS et al (2012) The 36-item short form health survey: reliability and validity in Chinese medical students. Int J Med Sci 9(7):521–526PubMedCrossRef Zhang Y, Qu B, Lun SS et al (2012) The 36-item short form health survey: reliability and validity in Chinese medical students. Int J Med Sci 9(7):521–526PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Liu H, Tao H, Luo Z (2009) Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 34(11):1211–1216 (discussion 1217)PubMedCrossRef Liu H, Tao H, Luo Z (2009) Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 34(11):1211–1216 (discussion 1217)PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Walker BF (2000) The prevalence of low back pain: a systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 1998. J Spinal Disord 13(3):205–217PubMedCrossRef Walker BF (2000) The prevalence of low back pain: a systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 1998. J Spinal Disord 13(3):205–217PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Woolf AD, Pfleger B (2003) Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 81(9):646–656PubMed Woolf AD, Pfleger B (2003) Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 81(9):646–656PubMed
6.
go back to reference Barrero LH, Hsu YH, Terwedow H et al (2006) Prevalence and physical determinants of low back pain in a rural Chinese population. Spine 31(23):2728–2734PubMedCrossRef Barrero LH, Hsu YH, Terwedow H et al (2006) Prevalence and physical determinants of low back pain in a rural Chinese population. Spine 31(23):2728–2734PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Andersson GB, Mekhail NA, Block JE (2006) A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial: intradiscal electrothermal therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine 31(14):1637–1638 (author reply 1638)PubMedCrossRef Andersson GB, Mekhail NA, Block JE (2006) A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial: intradiscal electrothermal therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine 31(14):1637–1638 (author reply 1638)PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kapural L, Mekhail N (2006) A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial: intradiscal electrothermal therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine 31(14):1636 (author reply 1636–1637)PubMedCrossRef Kapural L, Mekhail N (2006) A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial: intradiscal electrothermal therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine 31(14):1636 (author reply 1636–1637)PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mannion AF, Balague F, Pellise F et al (2007) Pain measurement in patients with low back pain. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 3(11):610–618PubMedCrossRef Mannion AF, Balague F, Pellise F et al (2007) Pain measurement in patients with low back pain. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 3(11):610–618PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Resnik L, Dobrykowski E (2005) Outcomes measurement for patients with low back pain. Orthop Nurs 24(1):14–24PubMedCrossRef Resnik L, Dobrykowski E (2005) Outcomes measurement for patients with low back pain. Orthop Nurs 24(1):14–24PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Resnik L, Dobrzykowski E (2003) Guide to outcomes measurement for patients with low back pain syndromes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 33(6):307–316 (discussion 308–317)PubMedCrossRef Resnik L, Dobrzykowski E (2003) Guide to outcomes measurement for patients with low back pain syndromes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 33(6):307–316 (discussion 308–317)PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ et al (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 23(18):2003–2013PubMedCrossRef Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ et al (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 23(18):2003–2013PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstuck FS et al (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective. Part 1: the Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):367–373PubMedCrossRef Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstuck FS et al (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective. Part 1: the Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):367–373PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R et al (2005) Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J 14(10):1014–1026PubMedCrossRef Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R et al (2005) Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J 14(10):1014–1026PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ferrer M, Pellise F, Escudero O et al (2006) Validation of a minimum outcome core set in the evaluation of patients with back pain. Spine 31(12):1372–1379 (discussion 1380)PubMedCrossRef Ferrer M, Pellise F, Escudero O et al (2006) Validation of a minimum outcome core set in the evaluation of patients with back pain. Spine 31(12):1372–1379 (discussion 1380)PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mannion AF, Boneschi M, Teli M et al (2012) Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J 21(Suppl 6):S737–S749PubMedCrossRef Mannion AF, Boneschi M, Teli M et al (2012) Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J 21(Suppl 6):S737–S749PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Genevay S, Cedraschi C, Marty M et al (2012) Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in patients with low back pain. Eur Spine J 21(1):130–137PubMedCrossRef Genevay S, Cedraschi C, Marty M et al (2012) Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in patients with low back pain. Eur Spine J 21(1):130–137PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F et al (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25(24):3186–3191PubMedCrossRef Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F et al (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25(24):3186–3191PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60(1):34–42PubMedCrossRef Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60(1):34–42PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Yu J, Coons SJ, Draugalis JR et al (2003) Equivalence of Chinese and US-English versions of the SF-36 health survey. Qual Life Res 12(4):449–457PubMedCrossRef Yu J, Coons SJ, Draugalis JR et al (2003) Equivalence of Chinese and US-English versions of the SF-36 health survey. Qual Life Res 12(4):449–457PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Zweig T, Mannion AF, Grob D et al (2009) How to Tango: a manual for implementing Spine Tango. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):312–320PubMedCrossRef Zweig T, Mannion AF, Grob D et al (2009) How to Tango: a manual for implementing Spine Tango. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):312–320PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M et al (1995) The Quebec back pain disability scale. Measurement properties. Spine 20(3):341–352PubMedCrossRef Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M et al (1995) The Quebec back pain disability scale. Measurement properties. Spine 20(3):341–352PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Mannion AF, Boneschi M, Teli M et al (2011) Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J 21:S737–S749PubMedCrossRef Mannion AF, Boneschi M, Teli M et al (2011) Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J 21:S737–S749PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW (2003) Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 41(5):582–592PubMed Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW (2003) Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 41(5):582–592PubMed
26.
go back to reference Qiu G, Qiu Y, Zhu Z et al (2011) Re-evaluation of reliability and validity of simplified Chinese version of SRS-22 patient questionnaire: a multicenter study of 333 cases. Spine 36(8):E545–E550PubMedCrossRef Qiu G, Qiu Y, Zhu Z et al (2011) Re-evaluation of reliability and validity of simplified Chinese version of SRS-22 patient questionnaire: a multicenter study of 333 cases. Spine 36(8):E545–E550PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Validation of the Simplified Chinese version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI)
Authors
Jun Qiao
Feng Zhu
Zezhang Zhu
Leilei Xu
Bin Wang
Yang Yu
Bang-Ping Qian
Yitao Ding
Yong Qiu
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 12/2013
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2761-1

Other articles of this Issue 12/2013

European Spine Journal 12/2013 Go to the issue