Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Emergency Medicine 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

Validation of the modified Japanese Triage and Acuity Scale-based triage system emphasizing the physiologic variables or mechanism of injuries

Authors: Hiraku Funakoshi, Takashi Shiga, Yosuke Homma, Yoshiyuki Nakashima, Jin Takahashi, Hiroshi Kamura, Masatomi Ikusaka

Published in: International Journal of Emergency Medicine | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale is a valid triage system. The system was translated and implemented in the Japanese emergency departments (EDs) from 2012. This system was named the Japanese Triage and Acuity Scale; however, the validation studies of the Japanese Triage and Acuity Scale have been limited. In addition, for a patient with multiple complaints, it could become challenging, due to its requirement of a single complaint. Therefore, we hypothesized that a modified version of the Japanese Triage and Acuity Scale using first-order modifiers without chief complaint detection is accurate.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study evaluated a correlation between the modified triage scale level and outcomes of all adult emergency department patients at a Japanese hospital.
Construct validity of the modified triage scale level was assessed based on comparisons of total admission rate (including hospitalizations, emergency department deaths) and length of stay between triage levels.

Results

The distributions of five levels of the triage scale (level 1 is the most urgent) among the 17,121 cases are as follows: 1:451, 2:1148, 3:7703, 4:7652, and 5:167. Total admission rates by each level were 1:89.8, 2:68.2, 3:26.4, 4:6.6, and 5:0.6 %, which progressively increased from level 5 to 1 and were significant (p < 0.01). Compared with patients in level 3, the odds of total admission rates were 14.4, 5.1, 0.27, and 0.030 for the patients in levels 1, 2, 4, and 5. The length of stay was longer in the patients with the more urgent levels except for those with level 1.

Conclusions

The modified version of the Japanese Triage and Acuity Scale is a valid predictor of total admission and length of stay and may enable the nurses to triage patients without detecting the chief complaints.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Christ M, Grossmann F, Winter D, Bingisser R, Platz E. Modern triage in the emergency department. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107:892–8.PubMedCentralPubMed Christ M, Grossmann F, Winter D, Bingisser R, Platz E. Modern triage in the emergency department. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107:892–8.PubMedCentralPubMed
2.
go back to reference Dong SL, Bullard MJ, Meurer DP, Blitz S, Akhmetshin E, Ohinmaa A, et al. Predictive validity of a computerized emergency triage tool. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:16–21.CrossRefPubMed Dong SL, Bullard MJ, Meurer DP, Blitz S, Akhmetshin E, Ohinmaa A, et al. Predictive validity of a computerized emergency triage tool. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:16–21.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Fernandes CMB, McLeod S, Krause J, Shah A, Jewell J, Smith B, et al. Reliability of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: interrater and intrarater agreement from a community and an academic emergency department. CJEM. 2013;15:227–32.PubMed Fernandes CMB, McLeod S, Krause J, Shah A, Jewell J, Smith B, et al. Reliability of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: interrater and intrarater agreement from a community and an academic emergency department. CJEM. 2013;15:227–32.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Vertesi L. Does the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale identify non-urgent patients who can be triaged away from the emergency department? CJEM. 2004;6:337–42.PubMed Vertesi L. Does the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale identify non-urgent patients who can be triaged away from the emergency department? CJEM. 2004;6:337–42.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Lee JY, Oh SH, Peck EH, Lee JM, Park KN, Kim SH, et al. The validity of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in predicting resource utilization and the need for immediate life-saving interventions in elderly emergency department patients. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19:68.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Lee JY, Oh SH, Peck EH, Lee JM, Park KN, Kim SH, et al. The validity of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in predicting resource utilization and the need for immediate life-saving interventions in elderly emergency department patients. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19:68.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Jiménez JG, Murray MJ, Beveridge R, Pons JP, Cortés EA, Garrigós JBF, et al. Implementation of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in the Principality of Andorra: can triage parameters serve as emergency department quality indicators? CJEM. 2003;5:315–22.PubMed Jiménez JG, Murray MJ, Beveridge R, Pons JP, Cortés EA, Garrigós JBF, et al. Implementation of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in the Principality of Andorra: can triage parameters serve as emergency department quality indicators? CJEM. 2003;5:315–22.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Shimajiri F, Okamoto K, Nishimura A, Imado S, Sawai K, Saitoh I, et al. Evaluation of emergency department triage system in Japan with questionnaires. J Jpn Soc Emerg Med. 2014;15:802–9 (in Japanese). Shimajiri F, Okamoto K, Nishimura A, Imado S, Sawai K, Saitoh I, et al. Evaluation of emergency department triage system in Japan with questionnaires. J Jpn Soc Emerg Med. 2014;15:802–9 (in Japanese).
8.
9.
go back to reference Guttmann A, Schull MJ, Vermeulen MJ, Stukel TA. Association between waiting times and short term mortality and hospital admission after departure from emergency department: population based cohort study from Ontario, Canada. BMJ. 2011;342:d2983.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Guttmann A, Schull MJ, Vermeulen MJ, Stukel TA. Association between waiting times and short term mortality and hospital admission after departure from emergency department: population based cohort study from Ontario, Canada. BMJ. 2011;342:d2983.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Storm-Versloot MN, Ubbink DT, Kappelhof J, Luitse JSK. Comparison of an informally structured triage system, the emergency severity index, and the manchester triage system to distinguish patient priority in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18:822–9.CrossRefPubMed Storm-Versloot MN, Ubbink DT, Kappelhof J, Luitse JSK. Comparison of an informally structured triage system, the emergency severity index, and the manchester triage system to distinguish patient priority in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18:822–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Gravel J, Manzano S, Arsenault M. Validity of the Canadian Paediatric Triage and Acuity Scale in a tertiary care hospital. CJEM. 2009;11:23–8.PubMed Gravel J, Manzano S, Arsenault M. Validity of the Canadian Paediatric Triage and Acuity Scale in a tertiary care hospital. CJEM. 2009;11:23–8.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Pinto D, Salgado P de O, Chianca TCM. Predictive validity of the Manchester Triage System: evaluation of outcomes of patients admitted to an emergency department. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2012;20:1041–7.CrossRefPubMed Pinto D, Salgado P de O, Chianca TCM. Predictive validity of the Manchester Triage System: evaluation of outcomes of patients admitted to an emergency department. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2012;20:1041–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Jobé J, Ghuysen A, Gérard P, Hartstein G, D’Orio V. Reliability and validity of a new French-language triage algorithm: the ELISA scale. Emerg Med J. 2014;31:115–20.CrossRefPubMed Jobé J, Ghuysen A, Gérard P, Hartstein G, D’Orio V. Reliability and validity of a new French-language triage algorithm: the ELISA scale. Emerg Med J. 2014;31:115–20.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Gräff I, Goldschmidt B, Glien P, Bogdanow M, Fimmers R, Hoeft A, et al. The German version of the Manchester Triage System and its quality criteria—first assessment of validity and reliability. PLoS One. 2014;9:e88995.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Gräff I, Goldschmidt B, Glien P, Bogdanow M, Fimmers R, Hoeft A, et al. The German version of the Manchester Triage System and its quality criteria—first assessment of validity and reliability. PLoS One. 2014;9:e88995.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Dalwai MK, Twomey M, Maikere J, Said S, Wakeel M, Jemmy J-P, et al. Reliability and accuracy of the South African Triage Scale when used by nurses in the emergency department of Timergara Hospital, Pakistan. S Afr Med J. 2014;104:372–5.CrossRefPubMed Dalwai MK, Twomey M, Maikere J, Said S, Wakeel M, Jemmy J-P, et al. Reliability and accuracy of the South African Triage Scale when used by nurses in the emergency department of Timergara Hospital, Pakistan. S Afr Med J. 2014;104:372–5.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Elshove-Bolk J, Mencl F, van Rijswijck BTF, Simons MP, van Vugt AB. Validation of the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) in self-referred patients in a European emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2007;24:170–4.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Elshove-Bolk J, Mencl F, van Rijswijck BTF, Simons MP, van Vugt AB. Validation of the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) in self-referred patients in a European emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2007;24:170–4.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Validation of the modified Japanese Triage and Acuity Scale-based triage system emphasizing the physiologic variables or mechanism of injuries
Authors
Hiraku Funakoshi
Takashi Shiga
Yosuke Homma
Yoshiyuki Nakashima
Jin Takahashi
Hiroshi Kamura
Masatomi Ikusaka
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Emergency Medicine / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1865-1372
Electronic ISSN: 1865-1380
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-015-0097-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

International Journal of Emergency Medicine 1/2016 Go to the issue