Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 1/2013

01-01-2013 | Original Article

Validation of the Head and Neck Patient Symptom Checklist as a nutrition impact symptom assessment tool for head and neck cancer patients

Authors: Karmen N. Schmidt, Kärin Olson, Catherine Kubrak, Matthew Parliament, Sunita Ghosh

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to test the validity of the Head and Neck Patient Symptom Checklist (HNSC).

Methods

Three hundred and sixty-eight treatment-naive individuals with head and neck cancer prospectively completed the HNSC and the Patient-Generated Symptom Global Assessment (PG-SGA). The predictive validity was determined by comparing the HNSC symptoms interference scores to the PG-SGA scores. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the HNSC symptoms scores associated with reduced dietary intake, ≥5 % weight loss over 6 months, and reduced functional performance (FP).

Results

HNSC sensitivity (79–98 %), specificity (99–100 %), positive predictive value (92–100 %), and negative predictive value (94–100 %) were excellent, and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.92. The multivariate logistic regression showed that advanced tumor stage, pain, loss of appetite (LOA), and difficulty swallowing significantly predicted dietary intake. Advanced tumor stage, LOA, and difficulty swallowing were also significant predictors of ≥5 % weight loss over 6 months. LOA, difficulty swallowing, feeling full, and lack of energy were significant predictors of reduced FP.

Conclusions

The HNSC appears to be a valid tool for determining symptoms interfering with dietary intake of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. This instrument may aid in early identification of symptoms that place HNC patients at risk for reductions in dietary intake, weight, and functional performance.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference DeWys WD, Begg C, Lavin PT et al (1980) Prognostic effect of weight loss prior to chemotherapy in cancer patients. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. AJM 69:491–497CrossRef DeWys WD, Begg C, Lavin PT et al (1980) Prognostic effect of weight loss prior to chemotherapy in cancer patients. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. AJM 69:491–497CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Couch M, Lai V, Cannon T et al (2007) Cancer cachexia syndrome in head and neck cancer patients: part 1. Diagnosis, impact on quality of life and survival, and treatment. Head Neck 29(4):401–411PubMedCrossRef Couch M, Lai V, Cannon T et al (2007) Cancer cachexia syndrome in head and neck cancer patients: part 1. Diagnosis, impact on quality of life and survival, and treatment. Head Neck 29(4):401–411PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Baracos VE (2006) Cancer-associated cachexia and underlying biological mechanisms. Annu Rev Nutr 26:435–461PubMedCrossRef Baracos VE (2006) Cancer-associated cachexia and underlying biological mechanisms. Annu Rev Nutr 26:435–461PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Grosvenor M, Bulcavage L, Chelbowski RT (1989) Symptoms potentially influencing weight loss in a cancer population. Correlations with primary site, nutritional status, and chemotherapy administration. Cancer 63(2):330–334PubMedCrossRef Grosvenor M, Bulcavage L, Chelbowski RT (1989) Symptoms potentially influencing weight loss in a cancer population. Correlations with primary site, nutritional status, and chemotherapy administration. Cancer 63(2):330–334PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kubrak C, Olson K, Jha N et al (2010) Nutritional impact symptoms: key determinants of reduced dietary intake, weight loss, and reduced functional capacity of head and neck cancer patients prior to treatment. Head Neck 32(3):290–300PubMed Kubrak C, Olson K, Jha N et al (2010) Nutritional impact symptoms: key determinants of reduced dietary intake, weight loss, and reduced functional capacity of head and neck cancer patients prior to treatment. Head Neck 32(3):290–300PubMed
7.
go back to reference Kubrak C, Jensen L (2007) Critical evaluation of nutrition screening tools recommended for oncology patients. Cancer Nurs 30(5):E1–E6PubMedCrossRef Kubrak C, Jensen L (2007) Critical evaluation of nutrition screening tools recommended for oncology patients. Cancer Nurs 30(5):E1–E6PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Larsson M, Gedelin B, Athlin E (2003) Lived experiences of eating problems for patients with head and neck cancer during radiotherapy. J Clin Nurs 12(4):562–570PubMedCrossRef Larsson M, Gedelin B, Athlin E (2003) Lived experiences of eating problems for patients with head and neck cancer during radiotherapy. J Clin Nurs 12(4):562–570PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mundform DJ, Shaw DG, Ke TL (2005) Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. IJT 5(2):159–168CrossRef Mundform DJ, Shaw DG, Ke TL (2005) Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. IJT 5(2):159–168CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bauer J, Capra S, Ferguson M (2002) Use of the scored patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer. Eur J Clin Nutr 56:779–785PubMedCrossRef Bauer J, Capra S, Ferguson M (2002) Use of the scored patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer. Eur J Clin Nutr 56:779–785PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Valanis B (1986) Epidemiology in nursing and health care. Appleton-Century-Crofts, Connecticut Valanis B (1986) Epidemiology in nursing and health care. Appleton-Century-Crofts, Connecticut
12.
go back to reference Salkind NJ (2008) Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, California Salkind NJ (2008) Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, California
13.
go back to reference Mickey J, Greenland S (1989) A study of the impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. Am J Epidemiol 129:125–137PubMed Mickey J, Greenland S (1989) A study of the impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. Am J Epidemiol 129:125–137PubMed
14.
go back to reference Sarhill N, Mahmoud F, Walsh D et al (2003) Evaluation of nutritional status in advanced metastatic cancer. Support Care Cancer 11:652–659PubMedCrossRef Sarhill N, Mahmoud F, Walsh D et al (2003) Evaluation of nutritional status in advanced metastatic cancer. Support Care Cancer 11:652–659PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Khalid U, Spiro A, Baldwin C et al (2007) Symptoms and weight loss in patients with gastrointestinal and lung cancer at presentation. Support Care Cancer 13:39–46CrossRef Khalid U, Spiro A, Baldwin C et al (2007) Symptoms and weight loss in patients with gastrointestinal and lung cancer at presentation. Support Care Cancer 13:39–46CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Jager-Wittenaar H, Dijkstra PU, Vissink A et al (2007) Critical weight loss in head and neck cancer—prevalence and risk factors at diagnosis: an explorative study. Support Care Cancer 15:1045–1050PubMedCrossRef Jager-Wittenaar H, Dijkstra PU, Vissink A et al (2007) Critical weight loss in head and neck cancer—prevalence and risk factors at diagnosis: an explorative study. Support Care Cancer 15:1045–1050PubMedCrossRef
17.
18.
go back to reference Payne R, Foley KM (1985) Advances in the management of cancer pain. Cancer Treat Rep 68:173–179 Payne R, Foley KM (1985) Advances in the management of cancer pain. Cancer Treat Rep 68:173–179
19.
go back to reference Frese M, Zapf D (1988) Methodological issues in the study of work stress: objective vs. subjective measurement of work stress and the question of longitudinal studies. In: Cooper CL, Payne R (eds) Causes, coping and consequences of stress at work. Wiley, Chichester Frese M, Zapf D (1988) Methodological issues in the study of work stress: objective vs. subjective measurement of work stress and the question of longitudinal studies. In: Cooper CL, Payne R (eds) Causes, coping and consequences of stress at work. Wiley, Chichester
20.
21.
go back to reference McClement S (2005) Cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome. Psychological effect on the patient and family. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 32(4):264–268PubMedCrossRef McClement S (2005) Cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome. Psychological effect on the patient and family. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 32(4):264–268PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Greene F et al (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer, Heidelberg Greene F et al (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer, Heidelberg
Metadata
Title
Validation of the Head and Neck Patient Symptom Checklist as a nutrition impact symptom assessment tool for head and neck cancer patients
Authors
Karmen N. Schmidt
Kärin Olson
Catherine Kubrak
Matthew Parliament
Sunita Ghosh
Publication date
01-01-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1483-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Supportive Care in Cancer 1/2013 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine