Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2016

01-10-2016 | Breast Oncology

Validation of the CPS + EG Staging System for Disease-Specific Survival in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Authors: Jad M. Abdelsattar, MBBS, Zahraa Al-Hilli, MD, Tanya L. Hoskin, MS, Courtney N. Heins, BS, Judy C. Boughey, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 10/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

CPS + EG staging, which incorporates estrogen receptor (ER) status and tumor grade with pretreatment clinical stage (CS) and post-treatment pathologic stage (PS), has been reported to have better correlation with outcome than classic TNM staging for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Our goal was to evaluate the performance of CPS + EG staging system in an external cohort treated with NAC.

Methods

We reviewed patients with stages I–IIIC breast cancer treated with NAC and surgery at our institution between 1988 and 2014. ER status, Nottingham grade, treatment, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) CS before NAC and PS after NAC, and follow-up data were collected. The discrimination of CPS + EG and pathologic AJCC stage were assessed using area under the curve (AUC) for survival data.

Results

A total of 769 patients were analyzed with a median follow-up of 2.6 (range 0.0–19.4) years; 103 patients died of breast cancer. Overall, the 5-year breast cancer cause-specific survival was 81.5 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 77.6–85.5]. The 5-year, cause-specific survival by CPS + EG score was 93.8 % score 0, 89.9 % score 1, 90.7 % score 2, 84.8 % score 3, 67.7 % score 4, and 43.4 % score 5/6. CPS + EG score was significantly associated with cause-specific survival (p < 0.001) with an AUC of 0.69 (95 % CI 0.62–0.77) at 5 years. This was higher than the AUC of 0.63 (95 % CI 0.56–0.70) for AJCC PS (p = 0.10).

Conclusions

This study validates the CPS + EG staging system using Nottingham grade in an external cohort. Addition of tumor biology and treatment response shows promise in improving survival estimates for patients treated with NAC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mauri D, Pavlidis N, Ioannidis JPA. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(3):188–94.CrossRefPubMed Mauri D, Pavlidis N, Ioannidis JPA. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(3):188–94.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Fisher B, Brown A, Mamounas E, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local–regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(7):2483–93.PubMed Fisher B, Brown A, Mamounas E, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local–regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(7):2483–93.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy: Updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(5):778–85.CrossRefPubMed Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy: Updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(5):778–85.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Boughey J, Peintinger F, Meric-Bernstam F, et al. Impact of preoperative versus postoperative chemotherapy on the extent and number of surgical procedures in patients treated in randomized clinical trials for breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2006;244(3):464–70.PubMedPubMedCentral Boughey J, Peintinger F, Meric-Bernstam F, et al. Impact of preoperative versus postoperative chemotherapy on the extent and number of surgical procedures in patients treated in randomized clinical trials for breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2006;244(3):464–70.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Smith TL, et al. Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(2):460–9.PubMed Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Smith TL, et al. Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(2):460–9.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, et al. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(15):1796–804.CrossRef Von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, et al. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(15):1796–804.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C, et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(28):4414–22.CrossRefPubMed Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C, et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(28):4414–22.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Harigopal M, Barlow WE, Tedeschi G, et al. Multiplexed assessment of the Southwest Oncology Group-directed Intergroup Breast Cancer Trial S9313 by AQUA shows that both high and low levels of HER2 are associated with poor outcome. Am J Pathol. 2010;176(4):1639–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Harigopal M, Barlow WE, Tedeschi G, et al. Multiplexed assessment of the Southwest Oncology Group-directed Intergroup Breast Cancer Trial S9313 by AQUA shows that both high and low levels of HER2 are associated with poor outcome. Am J Pathol. 2010;176(4):1639–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Ross JS. Multigene classifiers, prognostic factors, and predictors of breast cancer clinical outcome. Adv Anat Pathol. 2009;16(4):204–15.CrossRefPubMed Ross JS. Multigene classifiers, prognostic factors, and predictors of breast cancer clinical outcome. Adv Anat Pathol. 2009;16(4):204–15.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Yi M, Mittendorf E, Cormier JN, et al. Novel staging system for predicting disease-specific survival in patients with breast cancer treated with surgery as the first intervention: time to modify the current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(35):4654–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yi M, Mittendorf E, Cormier JN, et al. Novel staging system for predicting disease-specific survival in patients with breast cancer treated with surgery as the first intervention: time to modify the current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(35):4654–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Mittendorf EA, Jeruss JS, Tucker SL, et al. Validation of a novel staging system for disease-specific survival in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(15):1956–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mittendorf EA, Jeruss JS, Tucker SL, et al. Validation of a novel staging system for disease-specific survival in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(15):1956–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Marmé F, Aigner J, Lorenzo Bermejo J, Sinn P, Sohn C, Jager D, Schneeweiss A. Neoadjuvant epirubicin, gemcitabine and docetaxel for primary breast cancer: long-term survival data and major prognostic factors based on two consecutive neoadjuvant phase I/II trials. Int J Cancer 2013;133(4):1006–15.CrossRefPubMed Marmé F, Aigner J, Lorenzo Bermejo J, Sinn P, Sohn C, Jager D, Schneeweiss A. Neoadjuvant epirubicin, gemcitabine and docetaxel for primary breast cancer: long-term survival data and major prognostic factors based on two consecutive neoadjuvant phase I/II trials. Int J Cancer 2013;133(4):1006–15.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Marmé F, Lederer B, Blohmer J, et al. Utility of the CPS + EG staging system in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 2016;53:65–74.CrossRefPubMed Marmé F, Lederer B, Blohmer J, et al. Utility of the CPS + EG staging system in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 2016;53:65–74.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Dalton LW, Page DL, Dupont WD. Histologic grading of breast carcinoma: a reproducibility study. Cancer 1994;73(11):2765–70.CrossRefPubMed Dalton LW, Page DL, Dupont WD. Histologic grading of breast carcinoma: a reproducibility study. Cancer 1994;73(11):2765–70.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Carey LA, Metzger R, Dees EC, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis stage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast cancer outcome. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(15):1137–42.CrossRefPubMed Carey LA, Metzger R, Dees EC, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis stage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast cancer outcome. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(15):1137–42.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Simpson JF, Gray R, Dressler LG, et al. Prognostic value of histologic grade and proliferative activity in axillary node-positive breast cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Companion Study, EST 4189. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(10):2059–69.PubMed Simpson JF, Gray R, Dressler LG, et al. Prognostic value of histologic grade and proliferative activity in axillary node-positive breast cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Companion Study, EST 4189. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(10):2059–69.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Blanche P, Dartigues JF, Jacqmin-Gadda H. Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks. Stat Med. 2013;32(30):5381–97.CrossRefPubMed Blanche P, Dartigues JF, Jacqmin-Gadda H. Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks. Stat Med. 2013;32(30):5381–97.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Teshome M, Tucker S, Hunt K, Mittendorf E. Prognostic value of combined clinical and pathologic staging variables in predicting local–regional recurrence following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(Supplement 1):S15. Teshome M, Tucker S, Hunt K, Mittendorf E. Prognostic value of combined clinical and pathologic staging variables in predicting local–regional recurrence following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(Supplement 1):S15.
21.
go back to reference AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer). Breast cancer staging. In: Cancer staging manual, 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010. AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer). Breast cancer staging. In: Cancer staging manual, 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.
22.
go back to reference Park YH, Lee SJ, Cho EY, et al. Clinical relevance of TNM staging system according to breast cancer subtypes. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(7):1554–60.CrossRefPubMed Park YH, Lee SJ, Cho EY, et al. Clinical relevance of TNM staging system according to breast cancer subtypes. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(7):1554–60.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Wale C, et al. Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1829–34.CrossRefPubMed Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Wale C, et al. Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1829–34.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Paik S, Tang G, Shak S, et al. Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(23):3726–34.CrossRefPubMed Paik S, Tang G, Shak S, et al. Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(23):3726–34.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Albain KS, Barlow WE, Shak S, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. Lancet sOncol. 2010;11(1):55–65.CrossRefPubMed Albain KS, Barlow WE, Shak S, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. Lancet sOncol. 2010;11(1):55–65.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Baehner F, et al. Breast cancer prognostic classification in the molecular era: the role of histological grade. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(4):207.PubMedPubMedCentral Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Baehner F, et al. Breast cancer prognostic classification in the molecular era: the role of histological grade. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(4):207.PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 1991;19(5):403-10.CrossRefPubMed Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 1991;19(5):403-10.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Black M, Opler S, Speer F. Survival in breast cancer cases in relation to the structure of the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1955;100(5):543-51.PubMed Black M, Opler S, Speer F. Survival in breast cancer cases in relation to the structure of the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1955;100(5):543-51.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Mittendorf E, Vila J, Tucker S, et al. The Neo-Bioscore update for staging breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Incorporation of prognostic biologic factors into staging after treatment. JAMA Oncol. 2016. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.6478. Mittendorf E, Vila J, Tucker S, et al. The Neo-Bioscore update for staging breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Incorporation of prognostic biologic factors into staging after treatment. JAMA Oncol. 2016. doi:10.​1001/​jamaoncol.​2015.​6478.
Metadata
Title
Validation of the CPS + EG Staging System for Disease-Specific Survival in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Authors
Jad M. Abdelsattar, MBBS
Zahraa Al-Hilli, MD
Tanya L. Hoskin, MS
Courtney N. Heins, BS
Judy C. Boughey, MD
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5324-y

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2016 Go to the issue