Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Validating the British Columbia Perinatal Data Registry: a chart re-abstraction study

Authors: Gillian Frosst, Jennifer Hutcheon, KS Joseph, Brooke Kinniburgh, Cathe Johnson, Lily Lee

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The British Columbia Perinatal Data Registry (BCPDR) contains individual-level obstetrical and neonatal medical chart data for virtually all births occurring in British Columbia, Canada. The objective of this study was to assess the validity of information in the BCPDR by performing a provincial chart re-abstraction study.

Methods

A two-stage stratified clustered sampling design was employed. Obstetrical facilities were stratified based on geographic location and obstetrical volume. Charts of mothers and newborns with a length of stay of five or more days or transfer to another facility following the delivery were oversampled. A total of 85 maternal and 32 newborn variables were assessed for completeness (percent completion) and validity (sensitivity and specificity for categorical variables, intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] for continuous variables).

Results

1,084 maternal and 1,142 newborn charts were abstracted. Mandatory variables such as primary indication for induction and primary indication for cesarean delivery were 100 % complete. Some variables such as pre-pregnancy weight were relatively more complete in the re-abstraction as compared with the BCPDR (83.0 % vs 76.8 %; p < 0.001). The validity of key surveillance variables was high (e.g., HIV screening completed [sensitivity 98.0 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 97.0–98.8 %; specificity 72.3 %, 95 % CI 60.8–81.9 %], induction of labour [sensitivity 93.9 %, 95 % CI 90.2–96.5 %; specificity 98.7 %, 95 % CI 97.7–99.3 %], primary elective cesarean delivery [sensitivity 96.0 %, 95 % CI 83.8–99.7 %; specificity 99.8 %, 95 % CI 99.4–100.0 %], gestational age from newborn examination [ICC 0.99, 95 % CI 0.99–0.99]). Examples of variables with lower validity included total admissions prior to delivery episode, maternal smoking status, and timing of breastfeeding initiation.

Conclusion

Many important clinical and population health variables in the BCPDR had excellent validity. Some key variables warrant strengthening through improved definitions, system changes, and abstractor training.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Grzybowski S, Stoll K, Kornelsen J. The outcomes of perinatal surgical services in rural British Columbia: a population-based study. Can J Rural Med. 2013;18(4):123–9.PubMed Grzybowski S, Stoll K, Kornelsen J. The outcomes of perinatal surgical services in rural British Columbia: a population-based study. Can J Rural Med. 2013;18(4):123–9.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Marquette GP, Hutcheon JA, Lee L. Predicting the spontaneous onset of labour in post-date pregnancies: a population-based retrospective cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36(5):391–9.CrossRefPubMed Marquette GP, Hutcheon JA, Lee L. Predicting the spontaneous onset of labour in post-date pregnancies: a population-based retrospective cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36(5):391–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Mehrabadi A, Hutcheon JA, Lee L, Kramer MS, Liston RM, Joseph KS. Epidemiological investigation of a temporal increase in atonic postpartum haemorrhage: a population-based retrospective cohort study. BJOG. 2013;120(7):853–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mehrabadi A, Hutcheon JA, Lee L, Kramer MS, Liston RM, Joseph KS. Epidemiological investigation of a temporal increase in atonic postpartum haemorrhage: a population-based retrospective cohort study. BJOG. 2013;120(7):853–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Bell JC, Ford JB, Cameron CA, Roberts CL. The accuracy of population health data for monitoring trends and outcomes among women with diabetes in pregnancy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;81(1):105–9.CrossRefPubMed Bell JC, Ford JB, Cameron CA, Roberts CL. The accuracy of population health data for monitoring trends and outcomes among women with diabetes in pregnancy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;81(1):105–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Bradford HM, Cárdenas V, Camacho-Carr K, Lydon-Rochelle MT. Accuracy of birth certificate and hospital discharge data: a certified nurse-midwife and physician comparison. Matern Child Health J. 2007;11(6):540–8.CrossRefPubMed Bradford HM, Cárdenas V, Camacho-Carr K, Lydon-Rochelle MT. Accuracy of birth certificate and hospital discharge data: a certified nurse-midwife and physician comparison. Matern Child Health J. 2007;11(6):540–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Reeves MJ, Mullard AJ, Wehner S. Inter-rater reliability of data elements from a prototype of the Paul Cloverdell National Acute Stroke Registry. BMC. 2008;8:19.CrossRef Reeves MJ, Mullard AJ, Wehner S. Inter-rater reliability of data elements from a prototype of the Paul Cloverdell National Acute Stroke Registry. BMC. 2008;8:19.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference MacIntyre E, Linnegar M, Lencar C, Brauer M, Demers P, Ostry A. Perinatal Database Registry Chart Abstraction Validation Report. Vancouver (BC): University of British Columbia; 2006. MacIntyre E, Linnegar M, Lencar C, Brauer M, Demers P, Ostry A. Perinatal Database Registry Chart Abstraction Validation Report. Vancouver (BC): University of British Columbia; 2006.
10.
go back to reference Canada S. Survey Methods and Practices. Ottawa: Minister of Industry; 2010. Canada S. Survey Methods and Practices. Ottawa: Minister of Industry; 2010.
12.
go back to reference Butt K, Lim K. Determination of gestational age by ultrasound. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36(2):171–81.CrossRefPubMed Butt K, Lim K. Determination of gestational age by ultrasound. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36(2):171–81.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Perinatal Services BC. British Columbia Perinatal Data Registry Reference Manual, Version 6.0. Perinatal Services BC: Vancouver (BC); 2008. Perinatal Services BC. British Columbia Perinatal Data Registry Reference Manual, Version 6.0. Perinatal Services BC: Vancouver (BC); 2008.
14.
go back to reference Perinatal Services BC. Spotlight on presentation and position. PSBC Bull. 2011;4(3):5. Perinatal Services BC. Spotlight on presentation and position. PSBC Bull. 2011;4(3):5.
16.
go back to reference Perinatal Services BC. British Columbia Perinatal Data Registry Reference Manual, Version 6.01. Vancouver (BC): Perinatal Services BC; 2014. Perinatal Services BC. British Columbia Perinatal Data Registry Reference Manual, Version 6.01. Vancouver (BC): Perinatal Services BC; 2014.
17.
go back to reference Dunn S, Bottomley J, Ali A, Walker M. 2008 Niday Perinatal Database quality audit: report of a quality assurance project. Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2011;32(1):32–42.PubMed Dunn S, Bottomley J, Ali A, Walker M. 2008 Niday Perinatal Database quality audit: report of a quality assurance project. Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2011;32(1):32–42.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). CIHI Data Quality Study of the 2009-2010 Discharge Abstract Database. Ottawa (ON): CIHI; 2012. Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). CIHI Data Quality Study of the 2009-2010 Discharge Abstract Database. Ottawa (ON): CIHI; 2012.
19.
go back to reference Joseph KS, Fahey J. Validation of perinatal data in the Discharge Abstract Database of the Canadian Institute for Health Information. Chronic Dis Can. 2009;29(3):96–100.PubMed Joseph KS, Fahey J. Validation of perinatal data in the Discharge Abstract Database of the Canadian Institute for Health Information. Chronic Dis Can. 2009;29(3):96–100.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Validating the British Columbia Perinatal Data Registry: a chart re-abstraction study
Authors
Gillian Frosst
Jennifer Hutcheon
KS Joseph
Brooke Kinniburgh
Cathe Johnson
Lily Lee
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0563-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2015 Go to the issue