Top

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Published in:

08-05-2023 | KNEE

Valgus alignment of the femoral component is associated with higher revision rates 10 years after TKA

Authors: T. Luyckx, R. Moreels, H. Geernaert, L. Scheys, H. Vandenneucker

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 10/2023

Abstract

Purpose

Appropriate positioning and alignment of tibial and femoral component in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are factors of major importance directly related to patient satisfaction and implant survival. Most literature works elaborate on overall post-operative alignment and its correlation to implant survival. However, less is known about the impact of individual component alignment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of undercorrection of overall alignment as well as the effect of individual tibial and femoral component alignment on the post-operative failure rate after total knee arthroplasty.

Methods

Clinical and radiographic data of primary TKA cases from 2002 to 2004, with a minimum of 10-year follow-up, were retrospectively reviewed. The pre- and post-operative hip–knee–ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were measured on weight-bearing, full-length antero-posterior lower limb radiographs. Statistical analysis was performed to establish the correlation between both overall and implant alignment and revision rate.

Results

In total, 379 primary TKA cases were evaluated. The mean time of follow-up was 12.9 years (range 10.3–15.9 years, SD = 1.8). Nine out of 379 cases were revised due to aseptic loosening; the mean time to revision was 5.5 years (range 1.0–15.5 years, SD = 4.6). Varus undercorrection of overall alignment was not associated with a higher rate of revision (p = 0.316). Post-operative valgus femoral alignment (mLDFA < 87°) contributed to a significant decreased prosthesis survival in contrast to neutral femoral alignment (revision rate valgus group: 10.7% and neutral group: 1.7%; p = 0.003). Post-operative tibial mechanical alignment was not identified as a significant predictor for implant survival (revision rate varus group: 2.9% and neutral group: 2.4%; p = 0.855).

Conclusions

Primary TKA showed significantly higher revision rates when the femoral component was placed in > 3° of valgus (mLDFA < 87°). In contrast, postoperative overall residual varus alignment (HKA) and varus alignment of the tibial component were not related to higher revision rates at a minimum 10-year follow-up after TKA. These findings should be considered when choosing component position in individualised TKA.

Level of evidence

III.

Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MA (1983) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty: correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 173:178–183CrossRef

Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Lüring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J (2004) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Jt Surg Br 86(5):682–687CrossRef

Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J (2012) The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:45–53CrossRefPubMed

Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R et al (2004) The Chetranjan Ranawat Award: tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:26–34CrossRef

Bland JM, Altman D (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8CrossRefPubMed

Bonner T, Eardley W, Patterson P, Gregg P (2011) The effect of post-operative mechanical axis alignment on the survival of primary total knee replacements after a follow-up of 15 years. J Bone Jt Surg Br 93(9):1217–1222CrossRef

Calliess T, Ettinger M, Savov P, Karkosch R, Windhagen H (2018) Individualized alignment in total knee arthroplasty using image-based robotic assistance: video article. Orthopade 47(10):871–879CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cooke TDV, Sled EA, Scudamore RA (2007) Frontal plane knee alignment: a call for standardized measurement. J Rheumatol 34(9):1796–1801PubMed

D’Lima DD, Chen PC, Colwell CW (2001) Polyethylene contact stresses, articular congruity, and knee alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:232–238CrossRef

10.

Dorr LD, Boiardo RA (1986) Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:5–11CrossRef

11.

Dossett H, Estrada N, Swartz G, LeFevre G, Kwasman B (2014) A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year clinical results. J Bone Jt Surg Br 96(7):907–913CrossRef

12.

Dossett HG, Swartz GJ, Estrada NA, LeFevre GW, Kwasman BG (2012) Kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 35(2):e160–e169CrossRefPubMed

13.

Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE (2009) Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it? J Arthroplasty 24(6):39–43CrossRefPubMed

14.

Howell SM, Howell SJ, Kuznik KT, Cohen J, Hull ML (2013) Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:1000–1007CrossRefPubMed

15.

Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br 73(5):709–714CrossRef

16.

Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Park SD (2014) The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop 38:379–385CrossRefPubMed

17.

Lotke PA, Ecker ML (1977) Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Am 59(1):77–79CrossRef

18.

Magnussen RA, Weppe F, Demey G, Servien E, Lustig S (2011) Residual varus alignment does not compromise results of TKAs in patients with preoperative varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:3443–3450CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Morgan SS, Bonshahi A, Pradhan N, Gregory A, Gambhir A, Porter M (2008) The influence of postoperative coronal alignment on revision surgery in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 32:639–642CrossRefPubMed

20.

Oussedik S, Abdel MP, Victor J, Pagnano MW, Haddad FS (2020) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty: what’s in a name? J Bone Jt Surg Br 102(3):276–279CrossRef

21.

Paley D, Pfeil J (2000) Principles of deformity correction around the knee. Orthopade 29(1):18–38PubMed

22.

Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ (2010) Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Jt Surg Am 92(12):2143–2149CrossRef

23.

Ritter MA, Davis KE, Meding JB, Pierson JL, Berend ME, Malinzak RA (2011) The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br 93(17):1588–1596CrossRef

24.

Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:153–156CrossRef

25.

Salzmann M, Fennema P, Becker R, Hommel H (2017) Does postoperative mechanical axis alignment have an effect on clinical outcome of primary total knee arthroplasty? A retrospective cohort study. Open Orthop J 11:1330–1336CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Srivastava A, Lee GY, Steklov N, Colwell CW Jr, Ezzet KA, D’Lima DD (2012) Effect of tibial component varus on wear in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 19(5):560–563CrossRefPubMed

27.

Theodore W, Twiggs J, Kolos E, Roe J, Fritsch B, Dickison D et al (2017) Variability in static alignment and kinematics for kinematically aligned TKA. Knee 24(4):733–744CrossRefPubMed

28.

Vanlommel L, Vanlommel J, Claes S, Bellemans J (2013) Slight undercorrection following total knee arthroplasty results in superior clinical outcomes in varus knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(10):2325–2330CrossRefPubMed

29.

Xf W, Yang Y, Wang D, Xu H, Huang C, Zk Z et al (2022) Comparison of outcomes after total knee arthroplasty involving postoperative neutral or residual mild varus alignment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop Surg 14(2):177–189CrossRef

30.

Yeo JH, Seon JK, Lee DH, Song EK (2019) No difference in outcomes and gait analysis between mechanical and kinematic knee alignment methods using robotic total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(4):1142–1147CrossRefPubMed

31.

Zhou K, Ling T, Xu Y, Li J, Yu H, Wang H et al (2018) Effect of individualized distal femoral valgus resection angle in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis involving 1300 subjects. Int J Surg 50:87–93CrossRefPubMed

Title: Valgus alignment of the femoral component is associated with higher revision rates 10 years after TKA
Authors: T. Luyckx
R. Moreels
H. Geernaert
L. Scheys
H. Vandenneucker
Publication date: 08-05-2023
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 10/2023
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07448-2

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Valgus alignment of the femoral component is associated with higher revision rates 10 years after TKA

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Level of evidence

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Level of evidence

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 10/2023

Delaying ACL reconstruction is associated with increased rates of medial meniscal tear

Patients aged 50–75 years take longer to achieve the patient acceptable symptom state than patients aged 20–34 years following primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome

Partial debridement is the most commonly reported treatment option for mucoid degeneration of the anterior cruciate ligament: a systematic review

Gender-specific distribution of knee morphology according to CPAK and functional phenotype classification: analysis of 8739 osteoarthritic knees prior to total knee arthroplasty using artificial intelligence

Subchondral insufficiency fracture is a predictive factor of osteoarthritis progression and conversion to arthroplasty in non-surgically treated medial meniscus root tear

Gender and degree of tendon healing are independent predictive factors for clinical outcome in successfully healed rotator cuff tears