Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Reproductive Health
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Vaginism | Research

Bio-psychosocial factor of vaginismus in Iranian women

Authors: Mojdeh Banaei, Nourossadat Kariman, Giti Ozgoli, Maliheh Nasiri

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and aim

Various physical, psychological, social and cultural factors contribute to vaginismus. Therefore, given the multidimensionality of this disorder and the need to pay more attention to all biological, psychological and social dimensions in its treatment, the present study was conducted to investigate the bio-psychological factors contributing to vaginismus.

Methods

This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 180 Iranian women with vaginismus who had been referred to sexual health clinics of Tehran province in 2020. Multistage random sampling method was used in this study, and vaginismus was diagnosed in women by a specialist through using a questionnaire. Data collection tools included demographic and obstetric information form, valid and reliable Sexual Function Questionnaire, Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS), Sex Fear Questionnaire, Vaginal Penetration Cognition Questionnaire, Sexual Self-Efficacy Scale, Sexual Knowledge and Attitude Scale, Sexual Quality of Life-Female, Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction, ENRICH Marital Satisfaction Scale, Sexual Intimacy Scale and Questionnaire for Diagnosis of Vaginismus. In order to determine the factors related to vaginismus, multiple linear regression model was used through SPSS software version 25 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

Based on the results of the present study, the mean age of women and the mean duration of their marriage were 27.77 ± 5.36 and 4.07 ± 3.87 years respectively. As the results of multiple linear regression revealed, the variables of fear of sex (B = 0.141, P = 0.036), positive cognition (B = 0.197, P = 0.046), self-image (B = 0.651, P = 0.001), sexual intimacy (B = -0.116, P = 0.021), quality of sexual life (B = 0.115, P = 0.002) and education (B = 2.129, P = 0.024) from the bio-psychosocial model were the final predictors of vaginismus diagnosis score in women with this disorder. According to the results of multiple linear regression, 45.5% of the variance of vaginismus diagnosis total score was explained by these variables (R = 0.706, R2 = 0.498 and ADJ.R2 = 0.455).

Conclusion

The results of the present study showed that the variables of fear of sex, positive cognition and negative self-image, sexual intimacy, quality of sexual life and education were the final predictors of vaginismus diagnosis score. This disorder is, thus, considered to be multidimensional.
Literature
1.
Banaei M, et al. Prevalence of postpartum dyspareunia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2021;153(1):14–24.CrossRef
2.
Organization, W.H., Sexual health, human rights and the law. 2015: World Health Organization.
3.
Pâquet M, et al. Daily anxiety and depressive symptoms in couples coping with vulvodynia: associations with women’s pain, women’s sexual function, and both partners’ sexual distress. J Pain. 2018;19(5):552–61.PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
Fadul R, et al. Psychosocial correlates of vaginismus diagnosis: a case-control study. J Sex Marital Therapy. 2019;45(1):73–83.CrossRef
6.
Maseroli E, et al. Psychobiological correlates of vaginismus: an exploratory analysis. J Sex Med. 2017;14(11):1392–402.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Nobre PJ, Pinto-Gouveia J, Gomes FA. Prevalence and comorbidity of sexual dysfunctions in a Portuguese clinical sample. J Sex Marital Therapy. 2006;32(2):173–82.CrossRef
8.
Alizadeh A, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder: a population-based study of Iranian women. J Sex Med. 2019;16(7):1068–77.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Engman, M., Partial vaginismus: definition, symptoms and treatment. 2007, Institutionen för klinisk och experimentell medicin. Linköping University Medical Dissertations, 0345-0082; 1015.
10.
11.
Barnes J. Primary vaginismus (part 1): Social and clinical features. Ir Med J. 1986;79(3):59–62.PubMed
12.
Klaassen M, Ter Kuile MM. Development and initial validation of the vaginal penetration cognition questionnaire (VPCQ) in a sample of women with vaginismus and dyspareunia. J Sex Med. 2009;6(6):1617–27.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Ünal GT, Onur ÖŞ, Erten E. Comparison of vaginal penetration cognitions and metacognitions between women with genito-pelvic pain and penetration disorder and healthy controls. J Sex Med. 2020;17(5):964–74.CrossRef
14.
Anderson AB, et al. Associations between penetration cognitions, genital pain, and sexual well-being in women with provoked vestibulodynia. J Sex Med. 2016;13(3):444–52.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Yekeh FL, Goudarzi M. Prevalence of sexual dysfunction and related factors among married couples in Qazvin. JQUMS. 2009;13(1):49–55.
16.
Ellison C. Psychosomatic factors in the unconsummated marriage. J Psychosom Res. 1968;12(1):61–5.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Basson R. Lifelong vaginismus: a clinical study of 60 consecutive cases. Journal SOGC. 1996;18(6):551–61.CrossRef
18.
Ward E, Ogden J. Experiencing vaginismus–sufferers beliefs about causes and effects. Sex Marital Therapy. 1994;9(1):33–45.CrossRef
19.
Sobhgol S, Charndabee SMA. Rate and related factors of dyspareunia in reproductive age women: a cross-sectional study. Int J Impot Res. 2007;19(1):88–94.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Meana M, Fertel E, Maykut C. Treating genital pain associated with sexual intercourse. In: The Wiley handbook of sex therapy. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell; 2017. p. 98–114.
21.
Farnam F, et al. Vaginismus and its correlates in an Iranian clinical sample. Int J Impot Res. 2014;26(6):230.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Binik YM, Meana M. The future of sex therapy: specialization or marginalization? Arch Sex Behav. 2009;38(6):1016–27.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Berry MD, Berry PD. Contemporary treatment of sexual dysfunction: reexamining the biopsychosocial model. J Sex Med. 2013;10(11):2627–43.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Papadimitriou G. The “Biopsychosocial Model”: 40 years of application in psychiatry. Psychiatriki. 2017;28(2):107–10.PubMedCrossRef
25.
26.
Rosen R, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Therapy. 2000;26(2):191–208.CrossRef
27.
Fakhri A, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index: translation and validation of an Iranian version. J Sex Med. 2012;9(2):514–23.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3):335–43.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Samani S, Jokar B. Evaluation of reliability and validity of the short form of depression, anxiety and stress (DASS). J Soc Hum Sci. 2007;26:65–76.
30.
ter Kuile MM, et al. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for women with lifelong vaginismus: process and prognostic factors. Behav Res Therapy. 2007;45(2):359–73.CrossRef
31.
Vaziri S, LOtfi Kashani F. Study of factor structure, reliability and validity of the sexual self efficacy questionnaire. Thoughts Behav Clin Psychol. 2013;8(29):47–56.
32.
Besharat MA, Ranjbar KE. Development and validation of sexual knowledge and attitude scale. Contem Psychol. 2013;8(1):21–32.
33.
Symonds T, Boolell M, Quirk F. Development of a questionnaire on sexual quality of life in women. J Sex Marital Therapy. 2005;31(5):385–97.CrossRef
34.
Maasoumi R, et al. The sexual quality of life-female (SQOL-F) questionnaire: translation and psychometric properties of the Iranian version. Reprod Health. 2013;10(1):25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
Hudson WW, Harrison DF, Crosscup PC. A short-form scale to measure sexual discord in dyadic relationships. J Sex Res. 1981;17(2):157–74.CrossRef
36.
Bahrami N, et al. Validity and reliability of the persian version of larson sexual satisfaction questionnaire in couples. J Kerman Univ Med Sci. 2016;23(3):344–56.
37.
Fowers BJ, Olson DH. ENRICH marital satisfaction scale: a brief research and clinical tool. J Fam Psychol. 1993;7(2):176.CrossRef
38.
Alidousti AA, Nakhaee N, Khanjani N. Reliability and validity of the Persian versions of the ENRICH marital satisfaction (brief version) and Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scales. J Health Dev. 2015;4(2):158–67.
39.
Botlani S, et al. Effect of attachment-based couple therapy on sexual satisfaction and intimacy. J Fundam Mental Health. 2010;12(2):496–505.
40.
Shakarami M, Davarniya R, Zahrakar K, Gohari SH. The effect of sex education on sexual intimacy of married women. Iran J Psychiatr Nurs. 2014;2(1):34–42.
41.
Reisy L, Ziaee S, Mohamad E. Designing a questionnaire for diagnosis of vaginismus and determining its validity and reliability. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2015;25(125):81–94.
42.
43.
Lahaie M-A, et al. Can fear, pain, and muscle tension discriminate vaginismus from dyspareunia/provoked vestibulodynia? Implications for the new DSM-5 diagnosis of genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder. Arch Sex Behav. 2015;44(6):1537–50.PubMedCrossRef
44.
ter Kuile MM, Both S, van Lankveld JJ. Cognitive behavioral therapy for sexual dysfunctions in women. Psychiatr Clin. 2010;33(3):595–610.
45.
Rabinowitz D, Lowenstein L, Gruenwald I. Fear of vaginal penetration in the absence of pain as a separate category of female sexual dysfunction: a conceptual overview. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2017;8(2):e0016.PubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
Molaeinezhad M, et al. Development and validation of the multidimensional vaginal penetration disorder questionnaire (MVPDQ) for assessment of lifelong vaginismus in a sample of Iranian women. J Res Med Sci. 2014;19(4):336.PubMedPubMedCentral
47.
Pazmany E, et al. Body image and genital self-image in pre-menopausal women with dyspareunia. Arch Sex Behav. 2013;42(6):999–1010.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Barnes J, Bowman EP, Cullen J. Biofeedback as an adjunct to psychotherapy in the treatment of vaginismus. Biofeedback Self Regul. 1984;9(3):281–9.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Desrochers G, et al. Fear avoidance and self-efficacy in relation to pain and sexual impairment in women with provoked vestibulodynia. Clin J Pain. 2009;25(6):520–7.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Rosen NO, et al. Harmful or helpful: Perceived solicitous and facilitative partner responses are differentially associated with pain and sexual satisfaction in women with provoked vestibulodynia. J Sex Med. 2012;9(9):2351–60.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Borg C, et al. Vaginismus: heightened harm avoidance and pain catastrophizing cognitions. J Sex Med. 2012;9(2):558–67.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Graziottin A. Sexual pain disorders: dyspareunia and vaginismus. 2006, Wiley Online Library. p. 342–350.
53.
Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull. 1988;103(3):411.CrossRef
54.
SadatiKiadehi SM, Pazira R, Alavijeh FS. Comparing positive and negative emotional experiences between women with and without vaginismus. Arch Pharm Pract. 2020;1:138.
55.
Özdemir Ö, et al. The unconsummated marriage: its frequency and clinical characteristics in a sexual dysfunction clinic. J Sex Marital Therapy. 2008;34(3):268–79.CrossRef
56.
Van Der Velde J. A Psychophysiological investigation of the pelvic floor. The mechanism of vaginism. 1999, Thesis, University Amsterdam.
57.
Dogan S, Dogan M. The frequency of sexual dysfunctions in male partners of women with vaginismus in a Turkish sample. Int J Impot Res. 2008;20(2):218–21.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Althof SE. When an erection alone is not enough: biopsychosocial obstacles to lovemaking. Int J Impot Res. 2002;14(1):S99–104.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Althof SE, et al. Psychology: psychological and interpersonal dimensions of sexual function and dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2005;2(6):793–800.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Bio-psychosocial factor of vaginismus in Iranian women
Authors
Mojdeh Banaei
Nourossadat Kariman
Giti Ozgoli
Maliheh Nasiri
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01260-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Reproductive Health 1/2021 Go to the issue

Research

Contraceptive use among sexually active female adolescents in Ethiopia: trends and determinants from national demographic and health surveys

Research

A mixed-methods study exploring women’s perceptions of terminology surrounding fertility and menstrual regulation in Côte d’Ivoire and Nigeria

Research

Cost of hospital care of women with postpartum haemorrhage in India, Kenya, Nigeria and Uganda: a financial case for improved prevention

Research

The influence of social and cultural practices on maternal mortality: a qualitative study from South Punjab, Pakistan

Research

Non-pharmacological interventions of pain management used during labour; an exploratory descriptive qualitative study of puerperal women in Adidome Government Hospital of the Volta Region, Ghana

Research

Community views on short birth interval in Northern Uganda: a participatory grounded theory