Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2015

01-05-2015 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Vaginal cesarean section: heir to, but not legacy of Dührssen’s incision

Authors: Philippe Kadhel, Teddy Toto, Eustase Janky

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Vaginal cesarean section is a uterine incision technique derived from Dührssen’s incision, with which it is sometimes confused. We report here our experience over 10 years with this technique, with the aim of defining the situations in which it is potentially useful.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 24 cases of vaginal cesarean section (i.e. cervico-segmental incision) carried out from 2002 to 2011 in our tertiary maternity unit. This corresponds to an incidence of 1.1 per thousand deliveries. The main outcome measures were the indications and complications of vaginal cesarean section.

Results

The study population included 42 % nulliparous women. The fetuses concerned had a median gestational age of 24 weeks + 5 days (18 to 34 weeks + 1 day) and a median weight of 595 g (340–1,250 g). The indications for vaginal cesarean section were severe maternal morbidity in 54.2 % of cases, failed labor induction in 29.2 % and another indication in 16.7 %. All but one of the fetuses were dead or nonviable. Surgical complications were observed in three cases: two difficulties achieving hemostatic control and one bladder injury.

Conclusions

Vaginal cesarean section is sometimes considered obsolete, but it has several advantages: technical simplicity, limited tissue dissection, low risk of hemorrhage and no abdominal scar. These features make it particularly suitable for the extraction of medium-sized dead or nonviable fetuses when pharmacological options are ineffective or not rapid enough in cases of poor maternal condition.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Hunt A, Mcgee W (1936) Dührssen’s incisions: an analysis of 592 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 31:598–612 Hunt A, Mcgee W (1936) Dührssen’s incisions: an analysis of 592 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 31:598–612
6.
go back to reference Rubovits FE, Copperman NR (1955) The role of Duhrssen’s incisions in prolonged labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 69:1183–1192PubMed Rubovits FE, Copperman NR (1955) The role of Duhrssen’s incisions in prolonged labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 69:1183–1192PubMed
8.
go back to reference Seth S, Narath A, Singh D, Deoghary R (2010) Huge nulliparous prolapse with cervical dystocia. Nepal J Obstet Gynaecol 5:50–51 Seth S, Narath A, Singh D, Deoghary R (2010) Huge nulliparous prolapse with cervical dystocia. Nepal J Obstet Gynaecol 5:50–51
9.
go back to reference Racinet C, Favier M, Meddoun M (1984) La césarienne vaginale. In: Racinet C, Favier M, Meddoun M (eds) La césarienne. Masson, Paris, pp 125–130 Racinet C, Favier M, Meddoun M (1984) La césarienne vaginale. In: Racinet C, Favier M, Meddoun M (eds) La césarienne. Masson, Paris, pp 125–130
10.
go back to reference Le Thai N, Darbois Y, Lefebvre G, Soudre G, Vauthier-Brouzes D, Fitoussi A, Clough K (1993) [The vaginal cesarean, a necessary review]. La césarienne vaginale, une nécessaire réhabilitation. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 22:197–201 Le Thai N, Darbois Y, Lefebvre G, Soudre G, Vauthier-Brouzes D, Fitoussi A, Clough K (1993) [The vaginal cesarean, a necessary review]. La césarienne vaginale, une nécessaire réhabilitation. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 22:197–201
11.
go back to reference Malinas Y, Harris A (1957) [The Indications of Vaginal Cesarean Section.]. Les indications de la césarienne vaginale. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet 52:401–410PubMed Malinas Y, Harris A (1957) [The Indications of Vaginal Cesarean Section.]. Les indications de la césarienne vaginale. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet 52:401–410PubMed
12.
go back to reference Lacomme M (1960) La césarienne vaginale. In: Lacomme M (ed) La pratique obstétricale 2 Tomes, vol 2. Masson et Cie Editeurs, Paris, pp 1404–1406 Lacomme M (1960) La césarienne vaginale. In: Lacomme M (ed) La pratique obstétricale 2 Tomes, vol 2. Masson et Cie Editeurs, Paris, pp 1404–1406
13.
go back to reference Dargent D (1985) La césarienne vaginale. In: Dargent D (ed) Répertoire de chirurgie gynécologique par voie vaginale. Ediprim, Lyon, pp 649–657 Dargent D (1985) La césarienne vaginale. In: Dargent D (ed) Répertoire de chirurgie gynécologique par voie vaginale. Ediprim, Lyon, pp 649–657
14.
go back to reference Dumont A, De Bernis L, Wade F, Uzan S, Darbois Y (1996) [Vaginal cesarean for fetal deaths in utero]. Césarienne vaginale dans les Morts Fœtales in utero. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 25:623–628 Dumont A, De Bernis L, Wade F, Uzan S, Darbois Y (1996) [Vaginal cesarean for fetal deaths in utero]. Césarienne vaginale dans les Morts Fœtales in utero. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 25:623–628
Metadata
Title
Vaginal cesarean section: heir to, but not legacy of Dührssen’s incision
Authors
Philippe Kadhel
Teddy Toto
Eustase Janky
Publication date
01-05-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3539-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2015 Go to the issue