Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 1/2016

01-01-2016 | Original Article

Vaginal adhesions after transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgeries: prevalence and clinical implications

Authors: Grace Younes, Eyal Goldschmidt, Ariel Zilberlicht, Ron Auslender, Nir Haya, Yoram Abramov

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Our aim was to assess the prevalence of vaginal adhesions after transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgeries and evaluate relevant risk factors and impact on surgical outcome and sexual function.

Methods

This was a retrospective study examining medical records of all patients undergoing transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) at our institution between January 2006 and December 2007.

Results

One hundred and ninety -nine women were included in the study, of whom 165 had a comprehensive pre- and postoperative follow-up assessment and were available for final analysis. Vaginal adhesions were reported in 18 (10.9 %) women during the first follow-up visit 36 ± 34 days postoperatively. Adhesions were reported to be successfully separated manually in all cases during pelvic examination. Patients with or without vaginal adhesions showed no statistically significant differences in demographic, obstetric, or clinical characteristics or in severity of prolapse. No statistically significant correlation was found between any specific surgical procedure and the risk of developing vaginal adhesions. Rates of prolapse recurrence, postoperative vaginal narrowing and dyspareunia were not significantly different between groups.

Conclusions

Vaginal adhesion formation is a relatively common complication after transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgeries unrelated to preoperative degree of prolapse or to the type of surgery. If adhesions are separated manually at an early stage, surgical outcome and sexual function do not seem to be adversely affected.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Slieker-ten H, Marijke C, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Eijkemans MJC, Steegers-Theunissen R, Burger CW, Vierhout ME (2009) Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse and possible risk factors in a general population Research. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:184e1–184e7CrossRef Slieker-ten H, Marijke C, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Eijkemans MJC, Steegers-Theunissen R, Burger CW, Vierhout ME (2009) Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse and possible risk factors in a general population Research. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:184e1–184e7CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Brown JS, Waetjen LE, Subak LL, Thom DH, Van Den Eeden S, Vittinghoff E (2002) Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States, 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:712–716PubMedCrossRef Brown JS, Waetjen LE, Subak LL, Thom DH, Van Den Eeden S, Vittinghoff E (2002) Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States, 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:712–716PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hamilton Boyles S, Weber AM, Meyn L (2003) Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979–1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:108–115CrossRef Hamilton Boyles S, Weber AM, Meyn L (2003) Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979–1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:108–115CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidimiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506PubMedCrossRef Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidimiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Asante A, Whiteman MK, Kulkarni A, Cox S, Marchbanks PA, Jamieson DJ (2010) Elective oophorectomy in the united states: Trends and in-hospital complications, 1998–2006. Obstet Gynecol 116:1088–1095PubMedCrossRef Asante A, Whiteman MK, Kulkarni A, Cox S, Marchbanks PA, Jamieson DJ (2010) Elective oophorectomy in the united states: Trends and in-hospital complications, 1998–2006. Obstet Gynecol 116:1088–1095PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Haase P, Skibsted L (1988) Influence of operations for stress incontinence and/or genital descensus on sexual life. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 67:659PubMedCrossRef Haase P, Skibsted L (1988) Influence of operations for stress incontinence and/or genital descensus on sexual life. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 67:659PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kahn MA, Stanton SL (1997) Posterior colporrhaphy: Its effects on bowel and sexual function. Br J Obstet Gynecol 104:82–86CrossRef Kahn MA, Stanton SL (1997) Posterior colporrhaphy: Its effects on bowel and sexual function. Br J Obstet Gynecol 104:82–86CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lovatsis D, Drutz HP (2002) Safety and efficacy of sacrospinous vault suspension. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13:308–313PubMedCrossRef Lovatsis D, Drutz HP (2002) Safety and efficacy of sacrospinous vault suspension. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13:308–313PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dietz V, Maher C (2013) Pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 24(11):1853–1857CrossRef Dietz V, Maher C (2013) Pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 24(11):1853–1857CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Vollebregt A, Fischer K, Gietelink D, Van der Vaart CH (2011) Primary surgical repair of anterior vaginal prolapse: A randomised trial comparing anatomical and functional outcome between anterior colporrhaphy and trocar-guided transobturator anterior mesh. Brit J Obstet Gynecol 118(12):1518–1527CrossRef Vollebregt A, Fischer K, Gietelink D, Van der Vaart CH (2011) Primary surgical repair of anterior vaginal prolapse: A randomised trial comparing anatomical and functional outcome between anterior colporrhaphy and trocar-guided transobturator anterior mesh. Brit J Obstet Gynecol 118(12):1518–1527CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Carey M, Higgs P, Goh J, Lim J, Leong A (2009) Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomised controlled trial. Brit J Obstet Gynecol 116:1380–1386CrossRef Carey M, Higgs P, Goh J, Lim J, Leong A (2009) Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomised controlled trial. Brit J Obstet Gynecol 116:1380–1386CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nguyen JN, Burchette RJ (2008) Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 111:891–898PubMedCrossRef Nguyen JN, Burchette RJ (2008) Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 111:891–898PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sivaslioglu AA, Unlubilgin E, Dolen I (2008) A randomized comparison of polypropylene mesh surgery with site-specific surgery in the treatment of cystocoele. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:467–471PubMedCrossRef Sivaslioglu AA, Unlubilgin E, Dolen I (2008) A randomized comparison of polypropylene mesh surgery with site-specific surgery in the treatment of cystocoele. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:467–471PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Holley RL, Varner RE, Gleason BP, Apffel LA, Scott S (1996) Sexual function after sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse. J Reprod Med 41:355–358PubMed Holley RL, Varner RE, Gleason BP, Apffel LA, Scott S (1996) Sexual function after sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse. J Reprod Med 41:355–358PubMed
15.
go back to reference Francis WJA, Jeffcoate TNA (1961) Dyspareunia following vaginal operations. J Obstet Gynecol Br Commonw 68:1–10CrossRef Francis WJA, Jeffcoate TNA (1961) Dyspareunia following vaginal operations. J Obstet Gynecol Br Commonw 68:1–10CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Abramov Y, Gandhi S, Botros SM, Goldberg RP, Sherman W, Rurak M, Sand PK (2005) Do alterations in vaginal dimensions after reconstructive pelvic surgeries affect the risk for dyspareunia? Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1573–1577PubMedCrossRef Abramov Y, Gandhi S, Botros SM, Goldberg RP, Sherman W, Rurak M, Sand PK (2005) Do alterations in vaginal dimensions after reconstructive pelvic surgeries affect the risk for dyspareunia? Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1573–1577PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Vaginal adhesions after transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgeries: prevalence and clinical implications
Authors
Grace Younes
Eyal Goldschmidt
Ariel Zilberlicht
Ron Auslender
Nir Haya
Yoram Abramov
Publication date
01-01-2016
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2807-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

International Urogynecology Journal 1/2016 Go to the issue