Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Vacuum Therapy

Endoscopic vacuum therapy for in- and outpatient treatment of colorectal defects

Authors: Florian Kühn, Ulrich Wirth, Julia Zimmermann, Nicola Beger, Sandro M. Hasenhütl, Moritz Drefs, Christian Heiliger, Maria Burian, Jens Werner, Tobias S. Schiergens

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 12/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Evidence for endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) for colorectal defects is still based on small patient series from various institutions, employing different treatment algorithms and methods. As EVT was invented at our institution 20 years ago, the aim was to report the efficacy and safety of EVT for colorectal defects as well as to analyze factors associated with efficacy, therapy duration, and outpatient treatment.

Methods

Cohort study with analysis of prospectively collected data of patients receiving EVT for colorectal defects at a tertiary referral center in Germany (n = 281).

Results

The majority of patients had malignant disease (83%) and an American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of III/IV (81%). Most frequent indications for EVT were anastomotic leakage after sigmoid or rectal resection (67%) followed by rectal stump leakage (20%). EVT was successful in 256 out of 281 patients (91%). EVT following multi-visceral resection (P = 0.037) and recent surgical revision after primary surgery (P = 0.009) were risk factors for EVT failure. EVT-associated adverse events occurred in 27 patients (10%). Median treatment duration was 25 days. Previous chemo-radiation (P = 0.006) was associated with a significant longer duration of EVT. Outpatient treatment was conducted in 49% of patients with a median hospital stay reduction of 15 days and 98% treatment success. Younger patient age (P = 0.044) was associated with the possibility of outpatient treatment. Restoration of intestinal continuity was achieved in 60% of patients where technically possible with a 12-month rate of 52%.

Conclusions

In patients with colorectal defects, EVT appears to be a safe and effective, minimally invasive option for in- and outpatient treatment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Weidenhagen R, Gruetzner KU, Wiecken T et al (2007) Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a new method. Surg Endosc 22:1818–1825CrossRef Weidenhagen R, Gruetzner KU, Wiecken T et al (2007) Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a new method. Surg Endosc 22:1818–1825CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kuehn F, Schiffmann L, Janisch F et al (2016) Surgical endoscopic vacuum therapy for defects of the upper gastrointestinal tract. J Gastrointest Surg 20:237–243CrossRef Kuehn F, Schiffmann L, Janisch F et al (2016) Surgical endoscopic vacuum therapy for defects of the upper gastrointestinal tract. J Gastrointest Surg 20:237–243CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Loske G, Schorsch T, Müller C (2011) Intraluminal and intracavitary vacuum therapy for esophageal leakage: a new endoscopic minimally invasive approach. Endoscopy 43:540–544CrossRef Loske G, Schorsch T, Müller C (2011) Intraluminal and intracavitary vacuum therapy for esophageal leakage: a new endoscopic minimally invasive approach. Endoscopy 43:540–544CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kuehn F, Janisch F, Schwandner F et al (2016) Endoscopic vacuum therapy in colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 20:328–334CrossRef Kuehn F, Janisch F, Schwandner F et al (2016) Endoscopic vacuum therapy in colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 20:328–334CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chorti A, Stavrou G, Stelmach V et al (2020) Endoscopic repair of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review. Asian J Endosc Surg 13(2):141–146CrossRef Chorti A, Stavrou G, Stelmach V et al (2020) Endoscopic repair of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review. Asian J Endosc Surg 13(2):141–146CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kühn F, Janisch F, Schwandner F et al (2020) Comparison between endoscopic vacuum therapy and conventional treatment for leakage after rectal resection. World J Surg 44:1277–1282CrossRef Kühn F, Janisch F, Schwandner F et al (2020) Comparison between endoscopic vacuum therapy and conventional treatment for leakage after rectal resection. World J Surg 44:1277–1282CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Shalaby M, Emile S, Elfeki H et al (2018) Systematic review of endoluminal vacuum-assisted therapy as salvage treatment for rectal anastomotic leakage. BJS Open 3:153–160CrossRef Shalaby M, Emile S, Elfeki H et al (2018) Systematic review of endoluminal vacuum-assisted therapy as salvage treatment for rectal anastomotic leakage. BJS Open 3:153–160CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Shogan B, Carliste E, Alverdy J et al (2013) Do we know why colorectal anastomoses leak? J Gastrointest Surg 17:1698–1707CrossRef Shogan B, Carliste E, Alverdy J et al (2013) Do we know why colorectal anastomoses leak? J Gastrointest Surg 17:1698–1707CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Paun BC, Cassie S, MacLean AR et al (2010) Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 251:807–818CrossRef Paun BC, Cassie S, MacLean AR et al (2010) Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 251:807–818CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Snijders HS, Wouters MW, van Leersum NJ et al (2012) Meta-analysis of the risk for anastomotic leakage, the postoperative mortality caused by leakage in relation to the overall postoperative mortality. Eur J Surg Oncol 38:1013–1019CrossRef Snijders HS, Wouters MW, van Leersum NJ et al (2012) Meta-analysis of the risk for anastomotic leakage, the postoperative mortality caused by leakage in relation to the overall postoperative mortality. Eur J Surg Oncol 38:1013–1019CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Royo-Aznar A, Moro-Valdezate D, Martín-Arévalo J et al (2018) Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: a single-centre experience of 533 consecutive cases. Colorectal Dis 20:631–638CrossRef Royo-Aznar A, Moro-Valdezate D, Martín-Arévalo J et al (2018) Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: a single-centre experience of 533 consecutive cases. Colorectal Dis 20:631–638CrossRef
12.
go back to reference van de Wall BJ, Draaisma WA, Schouten ES et al (2010) Conventional and laparoscopic reversal of the Hartmann procedure: a review of literature. J Gastrointest Surg 14:743–752CrossRef van de Wall BJ, Draaisma WA, Schouten ES et al (2010) Conventional and laparoscopic reversal of the Hartmann procedure: a review of literature. J Gastrointest Surg 14:743–752CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Roig JV, Cantos M, Balciscueta Z et al (2011) Hartmann’s operation: how often is it reversed and at what cost? A multicentre study. Colorectal Dis 13:e396-402CrossRef Roig JV, Cantos M, Balciscueta Z et al (2011) Hartmann’s operation: how often is it reversed and at what cost? A multicentre study. Colorectal Dis 13:e396-402CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hünerbein M, Krause M, Moesta KT et al (2005) Palliation of malignant rectal obstruction with self-expanding metal stents. Surgery 137:42–47CrossRef Hünerbein M, Krause M, Moesta KT et al (2005) Palliation of malignant rectal obstruction with self-expanding metal stents. Surgery 137:42–47CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chopra SS, Mrak K, Hünerbein M (2009) The effect of endoscopic treatment on healing of anastomotic leaks after anterior resection of rectal cancer. Surgery 145:182–188CrossRef Chopra SS, Mrak K, Hünerbein M (2009) The effect of endoscopic treatment on healing of anastomotic leaks after anterior resection of rectal cancer. Surgery 145:182–188CrossRef
17.
go back to reference den Dulk M, Smit M, Peeters K et al (2007) A multivariate analysis of limiting factors for stoma reversal in patients with rectal cancer entered into the total mesorectal excision (TME) trial: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol 8:297–303CrossRef den Dulk M, Smit M, Peeters K et al (2007) A multivariate analysis of limiting factors for stoma reversal in patients with rectal cancer entered into the total mesorectal excision (TME) trial: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol 8:297–303CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Güenaga KF, Lustosa SA, Saad SS et al (2007) Ileostomy or colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD004647 Güenaga KF, Lustosa SA, Saad SS et al (2007) Ileostomy or colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD004647
19.
go back to reference Ji WB, Kwak JM, Kim J et al (2015) Risk factors causing structural sequelae after anastomotic leakage in mid to low rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 21:5910–5917CrossRef Ji WB, Kwak JM, Kim J et al (2015) Risk factors causing structural sequelae after anastomotic leakage in mid to low rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 21:5910–5917CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Popivanov GI, Mutafchiyski VM, Cirocchi R et al (2020) Endoluminal negative pressure therapy in colorectal anastomotic leaks. Colorectal Dis 22(3):243–253CrossRef Popivanov GI, Mutafchiyski VM, Cirocchi R et al (2020) Endoluminal negative pressure therapy in colorectal anastomotic leaks. Colorectal Dis 22(3):243–253CrossRef
21.
go back to reference van Koperen PJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Rosman C et al (2009) The Dutch multicenter experience of the endo-sponge treatment for anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 23:1379–1383CrossRef van Koperen PJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Rosman C et al (2009) The Dutch multicenter experience of the endo-sponge treatment for anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 23:1379–1383CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Fife CE, Walker D, Thomson B et al (2008) The safety of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure in diabetic foot ulcers treated in the outpatient setting. Int Wound J. 5(Suppl2):17–22CrossRef Fife CE, Walker D, Thomson B et al (2008) The safety of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure in diabetic foot ulcers treated in the outpatient setting. Int Wound J. 5(Suppl2):17–22CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Endoscopic vacuum therapy for in- and outpatient treatment of colorectal defects
Authors
Florian Kühn
Ulrich Wirth
Julia Zimmermann
Nicola Beger
Sandro M. Hasenhütl
Moritz Drefs
Christian Heiliger
Maria Burian
Jens Werner
Tobias S. Schiergens
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 12/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08172-5

Other articles of this Issue 12/2021

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2021 Go to the issue