Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 7/2016

01-07-2016 | Original Scientific Report

Utilization of Percutaneous Needle Biopsy for Breast Diagnosis in a Comprehensive Breast Center: Implications for Development of Quality Indicators

Authors: Claire M. B. Holloway, Lolwah Al-Riyees, Refik Saskin

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Percutaneous needle biopsy (PNB) is the standard of care for diagnosis of breast lesions. Rates of excisional biopsy for breast diagnosis in North America have been reported at approximately 35 %, although significant regional variation exists. A target rate of PNB for diagnosis of breast abnormalities is needed to facilitate quality improvement. We sought to describe the use of PNB in a referral practice, the clinical scenarios prompting PNB or surgical biopsy (SB), and the accuracy and rate of PNB to inform the ultimate development of a benchmark rate of PNB in breast diagnosis.

Materials and methods

Female patients age 18–90 years, referred to Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, a large teaching hospital affiliated with the University of Toronto, with a breast lesion prompting tissue diagnosis with SB and/or PNB between 2002 and 2009 were studied. Each biopsied lesion was characterized by method of biopsy: PNB, SB, or PNB followed by SB. For each lesion, we collected data on patient demographics and breast cancer risk, reason for referral, imaging characteristics (breast imaging-reporting and data system classification, full description, final impression before biopsy), and pathology from each biopsy method. We report concordance between the final impression pre-biopsy and the PNB diagnosis with final surgical diagnosis where applicable.

Results

One thousand and twenty-six lesions were biopsied, 987 (96 %) with PNB. The benign:malignant ratio for the entire cohort was 1.2:1. Final impression was concordant with final pathology in 674/862 (78 %) and PNB diagnosis was concordant with SB pathology in 487/556 (88 %). The reasons for SB without PNB were required pathologic evaluation of the entire lesion (n = 19), patient choice (n = 5), other biopsy technique used (n = 6), technical (n = 4), planned mastectomy (n = 3), and enlarging mass (n = 2). 155/559 (28 %) of lesions without evidence of malignancy on PNB ultimately underwent SB. Papillary lesions and radial scars were more likely to undergo SB with or without prior PNB. Lesions deemed to be suspicious or malignant on final impression were more likely to be excised after a benign diagnosis at PNB.

Conclusion

The vast majority of lesions requiring tissue diagnosis can be accurately diagnosed with PNB. Benchmarks for rates of PNB of 90 % or greater may be considered for performance measurement in appropriate populations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Silverstein MJ, Recht A, Lagios MD et al (2009) Special report: consensus conference III. Image-detected breast cancer: state-of-the-art diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 209:504–520CrossRefPubMed Silverstein MJ, Recht A, Lagios MD et al (2009) Special report: consensus conference III. Image-detected breast cancer: state-of-the-art diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 209:504–520CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference National Quality Forum 0221 (2012) Needle biopsy to establish diagnosis of cancer precedes surgical excision/resection. Endorsement Summary: Cancer Measures. April 30, 2015, p 6 National Quality Forum 0221 (2012) Needle biopsy to establish diagnosis of cancer precedes surgical excision/resection. Endorsement Summary: Cancer Measures. April 30, 2015, p 6
3.
go back to reference American Society of Breast Surgeons PQRS Measures (2015) Preoperative Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. Mastery of Surgery Program American Society of Breast Surgeons PQRS Measures (2015) Preoperative Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. Mastery of Surgery Program
4.
go back to reference Brenner RJ, Bassett LW, Fajardo LL et al (2001) Stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy: a multi-institutional prospective trial. Radiology 218:866–872CrossRefPubMed Brenner RJ, Bassett LW, Fajardo LL et al (2001) Stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy: a multi-institutional prospective trial. Radiology 218:866–872CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bruening W, Fontanarosa J, Tipton K, Treadwell JR, Launders J, Schoelles K (2010) Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of core-needle and open surgical biopsy to diagnose breast lesions. Ann Intern Med 152:238–246CrossRefPubMed Bruening W, Fontanarosa J, Tipton K, Treadwell JR, Launders J, Schoelles K (2010) Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of core-needle and open surgical biopsy to diagnose breast lesions. Ann Intern Med 152:238–246CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB et al (2007) Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 8:881–888CrossRefPubMed Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB et al (2007) Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 8:881–888CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Clarke-Pearson EM, Jacobson AF, Boolbol SK et al (2009) Quality assurance initiative at one institution for minimally invasive breast biopsy as the initial diagnostic technique. J Am Coll Surg 208:75–78CrossRefPubMed Clarke-Pearson EM, Jacobson AF, Boolbol SK et al (2009) Quality assurance initiative at one institution for minimally invasive breast biopsy as the initial diagnostic technique. J Am Coll Surg 208:75–78CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Holloway CM, Gagliardi AR (2009) Percutaneous needle biopsy for breast diagnosis: how do surgeons decide? Ann Surg Oncol 16:1629–1636CrossRefPubMed Holloway CM, Gagliardi AR (2009) Percutaneous needle biopsy for breast diagnosis: how do surgeons decide? Ann Surg Oncol 16:1629–1636CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Gutwein LG, Ang DN, Liu H et al (2011) Utilization of minimally invasive breast biopsy for the evaluation of suspicious breast lesions. Am J Surg 202:127–132CrossRefPubMed Gutwein LG, Ang DN, Liu H et al (2011) Utilization of minimally invasive breast biopsy for the evaluation of suspicious breast lesions. Am J Surg 202:127–132CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pocock B, Taback B, Klein L, Joseph KA, El-Tamer M (2009) Preoperative needle biopsy as a potential quality measure in breast cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1108–1111CrossRefPubMed Pocock B, Taback B, Klein L, Joseph KA, El-Tamer M (2009) Preoperative needle biopsy as a potential quality measure in breast cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1108–1111CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Del Turco MR, Ponti A, Bick U et al (2010) Quality indicators in breast cancer care. Eur J Cancer 46:2344–2356CrossRefPubMed Del Turco MR, Ponti A, Bick U et al (2010) Quality indicators in breast cancer care. Eur J Cancer 46:2344–2356CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Commission on Cancer, American College of SurgeonsCoC Measures for Quality of Cancer Care (2015) CoC Quality of Care Measures. April 30, 2015 Commission on Cancer, American College of SurgeonsCoC Measures for Quality of Cancer Care (2015) CoC Quality of Care Measures. April 30, 2015
13.
go back to reference Puglisi F, Zuiani C, Bazzocchi M et al (2003) Role of mammography, ultrasound and large core biopsy in the diagnostic evaluation of papillary breast lesions. Oncology 65:311–315CrossRefPubMed Puglisi F, Zuiani C, Bazzocchi M et al (2003) Role of mammography, ultrasound and large core biopsy in the diagnostic evaluation of papillary breast lesions. Oncology 65:311–315CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Muradali D, Kulkarni S (2005) Sonography of the breast: to core or not to core? Can Assoc Radiol J 56:276–288PubMed Muradali D, Kulkarni S (2005) Sonography of the breast: to core or not to core? Can Assoc Radiol J 56:276–288PubMed
15.
go back to reference Wen X, Cheng W (2013) Nonmalignant breast papillary lesions at core-needle biopsy: a meta-analysis of underestimation and influencing factors. Ann Surg Oncol 20:94–101CrossRefPubMed Wen X, Cheng W (2013) Nonmalignant breast papillary lesions at core-needle biopsy: a meta-analysis of underestimation and influencing factors. Ann Surg Oncol 20:94–101CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lannin DR, Ponn T, Andrejeva L, Philpotts L (2006) Should all breast cancers be diagnosed by needle biopsy? Am J Surg 192:450–454CrossRefPubMed Lannin DR, Ponn T, Andrejeva L, Philpotts L (2006) Should all breast cancers be diagnosed by needle biopsy? Am J Surg 192:450–454CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Olaya W, Bae W, Wong J et al (2010) Are percutaneous biopsy rates a reasonable quality measure in breast cancer management? Ann Surg Oncol 17:268–272CrossRefPubMed Olaya W, Bae W, Wong J et al (2010) Are percutaneous biopsy rates a reasonable quality measure in breast cancer management? Ann Surg Oncol 17:268–272CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Olaya W, Bae W, Wong J et al (2010) Accuracy and upgrade rates of percutaneous breast biopsy: the surgeon’s role. Am Surg 76:1084–1087PubMed Olaya W, Bae W, Wong J et al (2010) Accuracy and upgrade rates of percutaneous breast biopsy: the surgeon’s role. Am Surg 76:1084–1087PubMed
19.
go back to reference Lovrics P, Hodgson N, O’Brien MA et al (2014) Results of a surgeon-directed quality improvement project on breast cancer surgery outcomes in South-Central Ontario. Ann Surg Oncol 21:2181–2187CrossRefPubMed Lovrics P, Hodgson N, O’Brien MA et al (2014) Results of a surgeon-directed quality improvement project on breast cancer surgery outcomes in South-Central Ontario. Ann Surg Oncol 21:2181–2187CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Breslin TM, Caughran J, Pettinga J et al (2011) Improving breast cancer care through a regional quality collaborative. Surgery 150:635–642CrossRefPubMed Breslin TM, Caughran J, Pettinga J et al (2011) Improving breast cancer care through a regional quality collaborative. Surgery 150:635–642CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Breast Centres Standards (2014) National Accreditation Program for Breast Centres Standards Manual 1:79 Breast Centres Standards (2014) National Accreditation Program for Breast Centres Standards Manual 1:79
Metadata
Title
Utilization of Percutaneous Needle Biopsy for Breast Diagnosis in a Comprehensive Breast Center: Implications for Development of Quality Indicators
Authors
Claire M. B. Holloway
Lolwah Al-Riyees
Refik Saskin
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3293-0

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

World Journal of Surgery 7/2016 Go to the issue