Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 8/2011

01-08-2011 | Clinical Research

Utility of Routine Versus Selective Upper Gastrointestinal Series to Detect Anastomotic Leaks After Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass

Authors: Marc Schiesser, Josef Guber, Stefan Wildi, Ivo Guber, Markus Weber, Markus K. Muller

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 8/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In up to 4% of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedures, anastomotic leaks occur. Early detection of gastrointestinal leakage is important for successful treatment. Consequently, many centers advocate routine postoperative upper gastrointestinal (UGI) series. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of this practice after LRYGB.

Methods

Eight hundred four consecutive patients undergoing LRYGB from June 2000 to April 2010 were analyzed prospectively. The first 382 patients received routine UGI series between the third and fifth postoperative days (group A). Thereafter, the test was only performed when clinical findings (tachycardia, fever, and drainage content) were suspicious for a leak of the gastrointestinal anastomosis (group B; n = 422).

Results

Overall, nine of 804 (1.1%) patients suffered from leaks at the gastroenterostomy. In group A, four of 382 (1%) patients had a leak, but only two were detected by the routine UGI series. This corresponds to a sensitivity of 50%. In group B, the sensitivity was higher with 80%. Specificities were comparable with 97% and 91%, respectively. Routine UGI series cost only 1.6% of the overall costs of a non-complicated gastric bypass procedure. With this leak rate and sensitivity, US $86,800 would have to be spent on 200 routine UGI series to find one leak which is not justified.

Conclusions

This study shows that routine UGI series have a low sensitivity for the detection of anastomotic leaks after LRYGB. In most cases, the diagnosis is initiated by clinical findings. Therefore, routine upper gastrointestinal series are of limited value for the diagnosis of a leak.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jama. 2004;292(14):1724–37.PubMedCrossRef Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jama. 2004;292(14):1724–37.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Maggard MA, Shugarman LR, Suttorp M, et al. Meta-analysis: surgical treatment of obesity. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(7):547–59.PubMed Maggard MA, Shugarman LR, Suttorp M, et al. Meta-analysis: surgical treatment of obesity. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(7):547–59.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(26):2683–93.PubMedCrossRef Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(26):2683–93.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wittgrove AC, Clark GW, Tremblay LJ. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: preliminary report of five cases. Obes Surg. 1994;4(4):353–7.PubMedCrossRef Wittgrove AC, Clark GW, Tremblay LJ. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: preliminary report of five cases. Obes Surg. 1994;4(4):353–7.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lujan JA, Frutos MD, Hernandez Q, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity: a randomized prospective study. Ann Surg. 2004;239(4):433–7.PubMedCrossRef Lujan JA, Frutos MD, Hernandez Q, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity: a randomized prospective study. Ann Surg. 2004;239(4):433–7.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nguyen NT. Open vs. laparoscopic procedures in bariatric surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8(4):393–5.PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT. Open vs. laparoscopic procedures in bariatric surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8(4):393–5.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg. 2001;234(3):279–89. discussion 289–291.PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg. 2001;234(3):279–89. discussion 289–291.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Westling A, Gustavsson S. Laparoscopic vs open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective, randomized trial. Obes Surg. 2001;11(3):284–92.PubMedCrossRef Westling A, Gustavsson S. Laparoscopic vs open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective, randomized trial. Obes Surg. 2001;11(3):284–92.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, Gourash W, et al. Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2000;232(4):515–29.PubMedCrossRef Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, Gourash W, et al. Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2000;232(4):515–29.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wittgrove AC, Clark GW. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y-500 patients: technique and results, with 3–60 month follow-up. Obes Surg. 2000;10(3):233–9.PubMedCrossRef Wittgrove AC, Clark GW. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y-500 patients: technique and results, with 3–60 month follow-up. Obes Surg. 2000;10(3):233–9.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Byrne TK. Complications of surgery for obesity. Surg Clin North Am. 2001;81(5):1181–93. vii–viii.PubMedCrossRef Byrne TK. Complications of surgery for obesity. Surg Clin North Am. 2001;81(5):1181–93. vii–viii.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ovnat A, Peiser J, Solomon H, et al. Early detection and treatment of a leaking gastrojejunostomy following gastric bypass. Isr J Med Sci. 1986;22(7–8):556–8.PubMed Ovnat A, Peiser J, Solomon H, et al. Early detection and treatment of a leaking gastrojejunostomy following gastric bypass. Isr J Med Sci. 1986;22(7–8):556–8.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Hamilton EC, Sims TL, Hamilton TT, et al. Clinical predictors of leak after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(5):679–84.PubMedCrossRef Hamilton EC, Sims TL, Hamilton TT, et al. Clinical predictors of leak after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(5):679–84.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Toppino M, Cesarani F, Comba A, et al. The role of early radiological studies after gastric bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2001;11(4):447–54.PubMedCrossRef Toppino M, Cesarani F, Comba A, et al. The role of early radiological studies after gastric bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2001;11(4):447–54.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Serafini F, Anderson W, Ghassemi P, et al. The utility of contrast studies and drains in the management of patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2002;12(1):34–8.PubMedCrossRef Serafini F, Anderson W, Ghassemi P, et al. The utility of contrast studies and drains in the management of patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2002;12(1):34–8.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Muller MK, Guber J, Wildi S, et al. Three-year follow-up study of retrocolic versus antecolic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2007;17(7):889–93.PubMedCrossRef Muller MK, Guber J, Wildi S, et al. Three-year follow-up study of retrocolic versus antecolic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2007;17(7):889–93.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mason EE, Printen KJ, Barron P, et al. Risk reduction in gastric operations for obesity. Ann Surg. 1979;190(2):158–65.PubMedCrossRef Mason EE, Printen KJ, Barron P, et al. Risk reduction in gastric operations for obesity. Ann Surg. 1979;190(2):158–65.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Carucci LR, Turner MA, Conklin RC, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity: evaluation of postoperative extraluminal leaks with upper gastrointestinal series. Radiology. 2006;238(1):119–27.PubMedCrossRef Carucci LR, Turner MA, Conklin RC, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity: evaluation of postoperative extraluminal leaks with upper gastrointestinal series. Radiology. 2006;238(1):119–27.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Smith C, Gardiner R, Kubicka RA, et al. Gastric restrictive surgery for obesity: early radiologic evaluation. Radiology. 1984;153(2):321–7.PubMed Smith C, Gardiner R, Kubicka RA, et al. Gastric restrictive surgery for obesity: early radiologic evaluation. Radiology. 1984;153(2):321–7.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Doraiswamy A, Rasmussen JJ, Pierce J, et al. The utility of routine postoperative upper GI series following laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(12):2159–62.PubMedCrossRef Doraiswamy A, Rasmussen JJ, Pierce J, et al. The utility of routine postoperative upper GI series following laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(12):2159–62.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bertucci W, White S, Yadegar J, et al. Routine postoperative upper gastroesophageal imaging is unnecessary after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Am Surg. 2006;72(10):862–4.PubMed Bertucci W, White S, Yadegar J, et al. Routine postoperative upper gastroesophageal imaging is unnecessary after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Am Surg. 2006;72(10):862–4.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Lee SD, Khouzam MN, Kellum JM, et al. Selective, versus routine, upper gastrointestinal series leads to equal morbidity and reduced hospital stay in laparoscopic gastric bypass patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(4):413–6.PubMedCrossRef Lee SD, Khouzam MN, Kellum JM, et al. Selective, versus routine, upper gastrointestinal series leads to equal morbidity and reduced hospital stay in laparoscopic gastric bypass patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(4):413–6.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Utility of Routine Versus Selective Upper Gastrointestinal Series to Detect Anastomotic Leaks After Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass
Authors
Marc Schiesser
Josef Guber
Stefan Wildi
Ivo Guber
Markus Weber
Markus K. Muller
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 8/2011
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0284-y

Other articles of this Issue 8/2011

Obesity Surgery 8/2011 Go to the issue