Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 3/2016

01-03-2016 | IUJ Video

Uterus-preserving laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: a patient-centred outcome report and video of a continuous series of 245 patients

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Changes in the psychological value of reproductive organs have led to a growing interest in uterine-preserving surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Sacral hysteropexy is considered as gold standard, although dissection of the promontory may be challenging. We show a video and present a report on a series of patients operated by laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh as an alternative.

Methods

Clinical evaluation was performed using the simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q). Primary outcomes were subjective and objective cure; secondary outcomes were rates for reoperation and complications. We assessed patient’s satisfaction in a telephone interview using a visual analogue scale and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement Scale (PGI-I) scale.

Results

Two hundred and fifty-four patients were treated between 2004 and 2011 with a median follow-up of 7.5 years. At 1 year 82.7 % of patients were asymptomatic, and anatomic success rates were 88.2 % for the anterior, 86.1 % for the apical and 80.8 % for the posterior compartment; 1.2 % had mesh exposure, and the reoperation rate was 7.4 %. More than 80 % of patients were highly satisfied with the outcome.

Conclusions

Uterine-preserving laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh is a safe technique with promising results and low complication rates. It may be an alternative to sacral hysteropexy for high-morbidity patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Milsom I, Altman D, Herbison P, Lapitan MC, Nelson R, Sillén U et al (2009) Epidemiology of urinary (UI) and faecal (FI) Incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). In: Cardozo L, Abrams P, Khoury S, Wein A (eds) Incontinence. Health Publications Ltd, Paris, pp 35–111 Milsom I, Altman D, Herbison P, Lapitan MC, Nelson R, Sillén U et al (2009) Epidemiology of urinary (UI) and faecal (FI) Incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). In: Cardozo L, Abrams P, Khoury S, Wein A (eds) Incontinence. Health Publications Ltd, Paris, pp 35–111
2.
go back to reference Maher C et al (2013) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004014PubMed Maher C et al (2013) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004014PubMed
3.
go back to reference Clavien PA et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Haylen BT et al (2011) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) & grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Int Urogynecol J 22(1):3–15CrossRefPubMed Haylen BT et al (2011) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) & grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Int Urogynecol J 22(1):3–15CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Toozs-Hobson P et al (2012) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for reporting outcomes of surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 23(5):527–535CrossRefPubMed Toozs-Hobson P et al (2012) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for reporting outcomes of surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 23(5):527–535CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Uterus-preserving laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: a patient-centred outcome report and video of a continuous series of 245 patients
Publication date
01-03-2016
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2859-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

International Urogynecology Journal 3/2016 Go to the issue