Top

Published in:

24-08-2022 | Uterine Prolapse | Letter to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in uterine prolapse surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Karen Ruben Husby, Gunnar Lose, Niels Klarskov

Excerpt

Dear Editor, …

He L, Feng D, Zha X, et al. Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in uterine prolapse surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;33(7):1917–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04913-9.CrossRefPubMed

McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet. 2009;374:1105–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8.CrossRefPubMed

Brunes M, Johannesson U, Drca A, et al. Recurrent surgery in uterine prolapse: a nationwide register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2022;101(5):532–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14340.CrossRefPubMed

Husby KR, Larsen MD, Lose G, Klarskov N. Surgical treatment of primary uterine prolapse: a comparison of vaginal native tissue surgical techniques. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:1887–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03950-9.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Letter to the editor: Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in uterine prolapse surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Karen Ruben Husby
Gunnar Lose
Niels Klarskov
Publication date: 24-08-2022
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Keywords: Uterine Prolapse
Hysterectomy
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 10/2022
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05330-2