Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2017

01-06-2017

Using Twitter to Assess the Public Response to the United States Preventive Services Task Force Guidelines on Lung Cancer Screening with Low Dose Chest CT

Authors: Siddharth Khasnavis, Andrew B Rosenkrantz, Vinay Prabhu

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

To use Twitter to assess the immediate public response to the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2013 draft guidelines on lung cancer screening with low-dose chest CT (LDCT). The number of tweets including the phrases “lung cancer screening,” “lung CT,” “chest CT,” “low dose computed tomography,” “low dose CT,” or “LDCT” was recorded for 6 days before and after guidelines release. A systematic sample of 172 tweets from the week following release was coded for user type, tweet opinion, linked article source, and article opinion. Following guidelines’ release, the number of daily tweets increased from 13 ± 8 to 311 ± 395. The 172 tweets in the week following release were tweeted by 166 unique users including: news organizations/online news gathering accounts (34.9%), general public (21.7%), physicians (12.0%, 6 radiologists), and businesses (11.4%). 23.3% of tweets provided opinion on the guidelines (50.0% favorable, 27.5% concerned toward screening). Most (91.3%) tweets contained links to a total of 46 unique articles, which were authored by lay press (41.3%), non-peer-reviewed medical press (32.6%), and hospital/medical practice websites (10.9%). Among these, 50.0% were favorable, citing mortality reduction (87.0%), published data supporting screening (50.0%), and early detection (43.5%), while 28.3% expressed concern, including false positives (58.9%) and radiation risk (39.1%). Twitter activity rose rapidly after the USPSTF draft guidelines on LDCT. Most users were non-physicians and frequently cited non-peer-reviewed articles. Users maintained an overall favorable view of screening, while expressing various concerns. Considerable opportunity exists for greater radiologist engagement in this online public dialog.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Humphrey LL, Deffebach M, Pappas M, et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic review to update the US Preventive services task force recommendation. Annals of internal medicine 2013;159:411–20.CrossRefPubMed Humphrey LL, Deffebach M, Pappas M, et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic review to update the US Preventive services task force recommendation. Annals of internal medicine 2013;159:411–20.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. The New England journal of medicine 2011;365:395–409.CrossRef National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. The New England journal of medicine 2011;365:395–409.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rosenkrantz AB, Prabhu V. Public Interest in Imaging-Based Cancer Screening Examinations in the United States: Analysis Using a Web-Based Search Tool. AJR American journal of roentgenology 2016;206:113–8.CrossRefPubMed Rosenkrantz AB, Prabhu V. Public Interest in Imaging-Based Cancer Screening Examinations in the United States: Analysis Using a Web-Based Search Tool. AJR American journal of roentgenology 2016;206:113–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hoffman RM, Sussman AL, Getrich CM, et al. Attitudes and Beliefs of Primary Care Providers in New Mexico About Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography. Preventing chronic disease 2015;12:E108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hoffman RM, Sussman AL, Getrich CM, et al. Attitudes and Beliefs of Primary Care Providers in New Mexico About Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography. Preventing chronic disease 2015;12:E108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
7.
go back to reference Nakhasi A, Bell SG, Passarella RJ, Paul MJ, Dredze M, Pronovost PJ. The Potential of Twitter as a Data Source for Patient Safety. Journal of patient safety 2016 Nakhasi A, Bell SG, Passarella RJ, Paul MJ, Dredze M, Pronovost PJ. The Potential of Twitter as a Data Source for Patient Safety. Journal of patient safety 2016
8.
go back to reference Hawkins JB, Brownstein JS, Tuli G, et al. Measuring patient-perceived quality of care in US hospitals using Twitter. BMJ quality & safety 2015 Hawkins JB, Brownstein JS, Tuli G, et al. Measuring patient-perceived quality of care in US hospitals using Twitter. BMJ quality & safety 2015
9.
go back to reference Prabhu V, Lee T, Loeb S, et al. Twitter response to the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations against screening with prostate-specific antigen. BJU international 2015;116:65–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Prabhu V, Lee T, Loeb S, et al. Twitter response to the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations against screening with prostate-specific antigen. BJU international 2015;116:65–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Squiers LB, Holden DJ, Dolina SE, Kim AE, Bann CM, Renaud JM. The public's response to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 recommendations on mammography screening. American journal of preventive medicine 2011;40:497-504.CrossRefPubMed Squiers LB, Holden DJ, Dolina SE, Kim AE, Bann CM, Renaud JM. The public's response to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 recommendations on mammography screening. American journal of preventive medicine 2011;40:497-504.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Iaccarino JM, Clark J, Bolton R, et al. A National Survey of Pulmonologists' Views on Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer. Annals of the American Thoracic Society 2015;12:1667–75.PubMed Iaccarino JM, Clark J, Bolton R, et al. A National Survey of Pulmonologists' Views on Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer. Annals of the American Thoracic Society 2015;12:1667–75.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Retrouvey M, Patel Z, Shaves S. US Preventive Services Task Force CT lung cancer screening recommendations: community awareness and perceptions. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR 2015;12:114–5.CrossRefPubMed Retrouvey M, Patel Z, Shaves S. US Preventive Services Task Force CT lung cancer screening recommendations: community awareness and perceptions. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR 2015;12:114–5.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lewis JA, Petty WJ, Tooze JA, et al. Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening Practices and Attitudes among Primary Care Providers at an Academic Medical Center. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology 2015;24:664-70.CrossRef Lewis JA, Petty WJ, Tooze JA, et al. Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening Practices and Attitudes among Primary Care Providers at an Academic Medical Center. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology 2015;24:664-70.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Prabhu V, Rosenkrantz AB. Imbalance of opinions expressed on Twitter relating to CT radiation risk: an opportunity for increased radiologist representation. AJR American journal of roentgenology 2015;204:W48-51.CrossRefPubMed Prabhu V, Rosenkrantz AB. Imbalance of opinions expressed on Twitter relating to CT radiation risk: an opportunity for increased radiologist representation. AJR American journal of roentgenology 2015;204:W48-51.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kim AE, Hansen HM, Murphy J, Richards AK, Duke J, Allen JA. Methodological considerations in analyzing Twitter data. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs 2013;2013:140-6.CrossRefPubMed Kim AE, Hansen HM, Murphy J, Richards AK, Duke J, Allen JA. Methodological considerations in analyzing Twitter data. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs 2013;2013:140-6.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Mocanu D, Baronchelli A, Perra N, Goncalves B, Zhang Q, Vespignani A. The Twitter of Babel: mapping world languages through microblogging platforms. PloS one 2013;8:e61981.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mocanu D, Baronchelli A, Perra N, Goncalves B, Zhang Q, Vespignani A. The Twitter of Babel: mapping world languages through microblogging platforms. PloS one 2013;8:e61981.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Using Twitter to Assess the Public Response to the United States Preventive Services Task Force Guidelines on Lung Cancer Screening with Low Dose Chest CT
Authors
Siddharth Khasnavis
Andrew B Rosenkrantz
Vinay Prabhu
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9933-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2017 Go to the issue