Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 9/2016

01-09-2016 | Otology

Using the HISQUI29 to assess the sound quality levels of Spanish adults with unilateral cochlear implants and no contralateral hearing

Authors: Miryam Calvino, Javier Gavilán, Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado, Rosa M. Pérez-Mora, Elena Muñoz, Jesús Díez-Sebastián, Luis Lassaletta

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 9/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

To evaluate cochlear implant (CI) users’ self-reported level of sound quality and quality of life (QoL). Sound quality was self-evaluated using the hearing implant sound quality index (HISQUI29). HISQUI29 scores were further examined in three subsets. QoL was self-evaluated using the glasgow benefit inventory (GBI). GBI scores were further examined in three subsets. Possible correlations between the HISQUI29 and GBI were explored. Additional possible correlations between these scores and subjects’ pure tone averages, speech perception scores, age at implantation, duration of hearing loss, duration of CI use, gender, and implant type were explored. Subjects derived a “moderate” sound quality level from their CI. Television, radio, and telephone tasks were easier in quiet than in background noise. 89 % of subjects reported their QoL benefited from having a CI. Mean total HISQUI29 score significantly correlated with all subcategories of the GBI. Age at implantation inversely correlated with the total HISQUI29 score and with television and radio understanding. Sentence in noise scores significantly correlated with all sound perception scores. Women had a better mean score in music perception and in telephone use than did men. CI users’ self-reported levels of sound quality significantly correlated with their QoL. Cochlear implantation had a beneficial impact on subjects’ QoL. Understanding speech is easier in quiet than in noise. Music perception remains a challenge for many CI users. The HISQUI29 and the GBI can provide useful information about the everyday effects of future treatment modalities, rehabilitation strategies, and technical developments.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Arnoldner C, Lin VY, Bresler R, Kaider A, Kuthubutheen J, Shipp D, Chen JM (2014) Quality of life in cochlear implantees: comparing utility values obtained through the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form Survey-6D and the Health Utility Index Mark 3. Laryngoscope 124:2586–2590. doi:10.1002/lary.24648 CrossRefPubMed Arnoldner C, Lin VY, Bresler R, Kaider A, Kuthubutheen J, Shipp D, Chen JM (2014) Quality of life in cochlear implantees: comparing utility values obtained through the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form Survey-6D and the Health Utility Index Mark 3. Laryngoscope 124:2586–2590. doi:10.​1002/​lary.​24648 CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference WHO QOL Group. Measuring quality of life: the development of the World Health Organization quality of life instrument (WHO QOL) (1993). WHO, Geneva WHO QOL Group. Measuring quality of life: the development of the World Health Organization quality of life instrument (WHO QOL) (1993). WHO, Geneva
6.
go back to reference Bai Z, Stephens D (2005) Subjective outcome measures after cochlear implantation: overall measures. Audiol Med 3:212–219CrossRef Bai Z, Stephens D (2005) Subjective outcome measures after cochlear implantation: overall measures. Audiol Med 3:212–219CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gfeller K, Christ A, Knutson JF, Witt S, Murray KT, Tyler RS (2000) Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 11:390–406PubMed Gfeller K, Christ A, Knutson JF, Witt S, Murray KT, Tyler RS (2000) Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 11:390–406PubMed
11.
go back to reference Galindo J, Lassaletta L, Mora RP, Castro A, Bastarrica M, Gavilan J (2013) Fine structure processing improves telephone speech perception in cochlear implant users. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:1223–1229. doi:10.1007/s00405-012-2101-9 CrossRefPubMed Galindo J, Lassaletta L, Mora RP, Castro A, Bastarrica M, Gavilan J (2013) Fine structure processing improves telephone speech perception in cochlear implant users. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:1223–1229. doi:10.​1007/​s00405-012-2101-9 CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Cray JW, Allen RL, Stuart A, Hudson S, Layman E, Givens GD (2004) An investigation of telephone use among cochlear implant recipients. Am J Audiol 13:200–212CrossRefPubMed Cray JW, Allen RL, Stuart A, Hudson S, Layman E, Givens GD (2004) An investigation of telephone use among cochlear implant recipients. Am J Audiol 13:200–212CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Coelho DH, Hammerschlag PE, Bat-Chava Y, Kohan D (2009) Psychometric validity of the Cochlear implant function index (CIFI): a quality of life assessment tool for adult cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants Int 10:70–83. doi:10.1002/cii.395 CrossRefPubMed Coelho DH, Hammerschlag PE, Bat-Chava Y, Kohan D (2009) Psychometric validity of the Cochlear implant function index (CIFI): a quality of life assessment tool for adult cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants Int 10:70–83. doi:10.​1002/​cii.​395 CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Amann E, Anderson I (2014) Development and validation of a questionnaire for hearing implant users to self-assess their auditory abilities in everyday communication situations: the hearing implant sound quality index (HISQUI19). Acta Otolaryngol 134:915–923. doi:10.3109/00016489.2014.909604 CrossRefPubMed Amann E, Anderson I (2014) Development and validation of a questionnaire for hearing implant users to self-assess their auditory abilities in everyday communication situations: the hearing implant sound quality index (HISQUI19). Acta Otolaryngol 134:915–923. doi:10.​3109/​00016489.​2014.​909604 CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG (1996) Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 105:415–422CrossRefPubMed Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG (1996) Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 105:415–422CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Sanchez-Cuadrado I, Lassaletta L, Perez-Mora R, Munoz E, Gavilan J (2015) Reliability and validity of the Spanish Glasgow Benefit Inventory after cochlear implant surgery in adults. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272:333–336. doi:10.1007/s00405-013-2844-y CrossRefPubMed Sanchez-Cuadrado I, Lassaletta L, Perez-Mora R, Munoz E, Gavilan J (2015) Reliability and validity of the Spanish Glasgow Benefit Inventory after cochlear implant surgery in adults. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272:333–336. doi:10.​1007/​s00405-013-2844-y CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Cárdenas de MR, Marrero V (1994) Cuaderno de Logoaudiometría. Cuadernos de la Universidad de Educación a Distancia. Simancas Ed Cárdenas de MR, Marrero V (1994) Cuaderno de Logoaudiometría. Cuadernos de la Universidad de Educación a Distancia. Simancas Ed
22.
go back to reference Gfeller K, Witt S, Woodworth G, Mehr MA, Knutson J (2002) Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 111:349–356CrossRefPubMed Gfeller K, Witt S, Woodworth G, Mehr MA, Knutson J (2002) Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 111:349–356CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kong YY, Cruz R, Jones JA, Zeng FG (2004) Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear 25:173–185CrossRefPubMed Kong YY, Cruz R, Jones JA, Zeng FG (2004) Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear 25:173–185CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Migirov L, Kronenberg J, Henkin Y (2009) Self-reported listening habits and enjoyment of music among adult cochlear implant recipients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 118:350–355CrossRefPubMed Migirov L, Kronenberg J, Henkin Y (2009) Self-reported listening habits and enjoyment of music among adult cochlear implant recipients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 118:350–355CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Lassaletta L, Castro A, Bastarrica M, Perez-Mora R, Herran B, Sanz L, de Sarria MJ, Gavilan J (2008) Musical perception and enjoyment in post-lingual patients with cochlear implants. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 59:228–234CrossRefPubMed Lassaletta L, Castro A, Bastarrica M, Perez-Mora R, Herran B, Sanz L, de Sarria MJ, Gavilan J (2008) Musical perception and enjoyment in post-lingual patients with cochlear implants. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 59:228–234CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Lassaletta L, Castro A, Bastarrica M, Perez-Mora R, Madero R, De Sarria J, Gavilan J (2007) Does music perception have an impact on quality of life following cochlear implantation? Acta Otolaryngol 127:682–686. doi:10.1080/00016480601002112 CrossRefPubMed Lassaletta L, Castro A, Bastarrica M, Perez-Mora R, Madero R, De Sarria J, Gavilan J (2007) Does music perception have an impact on quality of life following cochlear implantation? Acta Otolaryngol 127:682–686. doi:10.​1080/​0001648060100211​2 CrossRefPubMed
31.
32.
go back to reference Qin MK, Oxenham AJ (2003) Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. J Acoust Soc Am 114:446–454CrossRefPubMed Qin MK, Oxenham AJ (2003) Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. J Acoust Soc Am 114:446–454CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Gfeller K, Turner C, Oleson J, Kliethermes S, Driscoll V (2012) Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients in speech reception in the presence of background music. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 121:782–791CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gfeller K, Turner C, Oleson J, Kliethermes S, Driscoll V (2012) Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients in speech reception in the presence of background music. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 121:782–791CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Oyanguren V, Gomes MV, Tsuji RK, Bento RF, Brito Neto R (2010) Auditory results from cochlear implants in elderly people. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 76:450–453CrossRefPubMed Oyanguren V, Gomes MV, Tsuji RK, Bento RF, Brito Neto R (2010) Auditory results from cochlear implants in elderly people. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 76:450–453CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Loeffler C, Aschendorff A, Burger T, Kroeger S, Laszig R, Arndt S (2010) Quality of life measurements after cochlear implantation. Open Otorhinolaryngol J 4:47–54CrossRef Loeffler C, Aschendorff A, Burger T, Kroeger S, Laszig R, Arndt S (2010) Quality of life measurements after cochlear implantation. Open Otorhinolaryngol J 4:47–54CrossRef
42.
43.
go back to reference Sanchez-Cuadrado I, Lassaletta L, Perez-Mora RM, Zernotti M, Di Gregorio MF, Boccio C, Gavilan J (2013) Is there an age limit for cochlear implantation? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 122:222–228CrossRefPubMed Sanchez-Cuadrado I, Lassaletta L, Perez-Mora RM, Zernotti M, Di Gregorio MF, Boccio C, Gavilan J (2013) Is there an age limit for cochlear implantation? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 122:222–228CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Zwartenkot JW, Hashemi J, Cremers CW, Mulder JJ, Snik AF (2013) Active middle ear implantation for patients with sensorineural hearing loss and external otitis: long-term outcome in patient satisfaction. Otol Neurotol 34:855–861. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e31828f47c2 CrossRefPubMed Zwartenkot JW, Hashemi J, Cremers CW, Mulder JJ, Snik AF (2013) Active middle ear implantation for patients with sensorineural hearing loss and external otitis: long-term outcome in patient satisfaction. Otol Neurotol 34:855–861. doi:10.​1097/​MAO.​0b013e31828f47c2​ CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Berrettini S, Baggiani A, Bruschini L, Cassandro E, Cuda D, Filipo R, Palla I, Quaranta N, Forli F (2011) Systematic review of the literature on the clinical effectiveness of the cochlear implant procedure in adult patients. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 31:299–310PubMedPubMedCentral Berrettini S, Baggiani A, Bruschini L, Cassandro E, Cuda D, Filipo R, Palla I, Quaranta N, Forli F (2011) Systematic review of the literature on the clinical effectiveness of the cochlear implant procedure in adult patients. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 31:299–310PubMedPubMedCentral
46.
go back to reference Kelsall DC, Shallop JK, Burnelli T (1995) Cochlear implantation in the elderly. Am J Otol 16:609–615PubMed Kelsall DC, Shallop JK, Burnelli T (1995) Cochlear implantation in the elderly. Am J Otol 16:609–615PubMed
48.
go back to reference Francis HW, Yeagle JD, Bowditch S, Niparko JK (2005) Cochlear implant outcome is not influenced by the choice of ear. Ear Hear 26:7S–16SCrossRefPubMed Francis HW, Yeagle JD, Bowditch S, Niparko JK (2005) Cochlear implant outcome is not influenced by the choice of ear. Ear Hear 26:7S–16SCrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Mo B, Lindbaek M, Harris S (2005) Cochlear implants and quality of life: a prospective study. Ear Hear 26:186–194CrossRefPubMed Mo B, Lindbaek M, Harris S (2005) Cochlear implants and quality of life: a prospective study. Ear Hear 26:186–194CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Adams JS, Hasenstab MS, Pippin GW, Sismanis A (2004) Telephone use and understanding in patients with cochlear implants. Ear Nose Throat J 83:96, 99–100, 102–103 Adams JS, Hasenstab MS, Pippin GW, Sismanis A (2004) Telephone use and understanding in patients with cochlear implants. Ear Nose Throat J 83:96, 99–100, 102–103
54.
55.
go back to reference Weissgerber T, Baumann U, Brand T, Neumann K (2012) German Oldenburg Sentence Test for Children: a useful speech audiometry tool for hearing-impaired children at kindergarten and school age. Folia Phoniatr Logop 64:227–233. doi:10.1159/000342414 CrossRefPubMed Weissgerber T, Baumann U, Brand T, Neumann K (2012) German Oldenburg Sentence Test for Children: a useful speech audiometry tool for hearing-impaired children at kindergarten and school age. Folia Phoniatr Logop 64:227–233. doi:10.​1159/​000342414 CrossRefPubMed
57.
go back to reference Fuller C, Free R, Maat B, Baskent D (2012) Musical background not associated with self-perceived hearing performance or speech perception in postlingual cochlear-implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 132:1009–1016. doi:10.1121/1.4730910 CrossRefPubMed Fuller C, Free R, Maat B, Baskent D (2012) Musical background not associated with self-perceived hearing performance or speech perception in postlingual cochlear-implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 132:1009–1016. doi:10.​1121/​1.​4730910 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Using the HISQUI29 to assess the sound quality levels of Spanish adults with unilateral cochlear implants and no contralateral hearing
Authors
Miryam Calvino
Javier Gavilán
Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado
Rosa M. Pérez-Mora
Elena Muñoz
Jesús Díez-Sebastián
Luis Lassaletta
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3789-0

Other articles of this Issue 9/2016

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 9/2016 Go to the issue