Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Using open source accelerometer analysis to assess physical activity and sedentary behaviour in overweight and obese adults

Authors: Paul Innerd, Rory Harrison, Morc Coulson

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Physical activity and sedentary behaviour are difficult to assess in overweight and obese adults. However, the use of open-source, raw accelerometer data analysis could overcome this. This study compared raw accelerometer and questionnaire-assessed moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), walking and sedentary behaviour in normal, overweight and obese adults, and determined the effect of using different methods to categorise overweight and obesity, namely body mass index (BMI), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR).

Methods

One hundred twenty adults, aged 24–60 years, wore a raw, tri-axial accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X+), for 3 days and completed a physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ-S). We used open-source accelerometer analyses to estimate MVPA, walking and sedentary behaviour from a single raw accelerometer signal. Accelerometer and questionnaire-assessed measures were compared in normal, overweight and obese adults categorised using BMI, BIA and WHR.

Results

Relationships between accelerometer and questionnaire-assessed MVPA (Rs = 0.30 to 0.48) and walking (Rs = 0.43 to 0.58) were stronger in normal and overweight groups whilst sedentary behaviour were modest (Rs = 0.22 to 0.38) in normal, overweight and obese groups. The use of WHR resulted in stronger agreement between the questionnaire and accelerometer than BMI and BIA. Finally, accelerometer data showed stronger associations with BMI, BIA and WHR (Rs = 0.40 to 0.77) than questionnaire data (Rs = 0.24 to 0.37).

Conclusions

Open-source, raw accelerometer data analysis can be used to estimate MVPA, walking and sedentary behaviour from a single acceleration signal in normal, overweight and obese adults. Our data supports the use of WHR to categorise overweight and obese adults. This evidence helps researchers obtain more accurate measures of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in overweight and obese populations.
Literature
1.
Maher CA, et al. The independent and combined associations of physical activity and sedentary behavior with obesity in adults: NHANES 2003-06. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;
2.
Van Dyck D, et al. International study of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time with body mass index and obesity: IPEN adult study. Int J Obes. 2015;39(2):199–207.CrossRef
3.
Shields M, Connor Gorber S, Tremblay MS. Associations between obesity and morbidity: effects of measurement methods. Obes Rev. 2008;9(5):501–2. author reply 503CrossRefPubMed
4.
Golubic R, et al. Rate of weight gain predicts change in physical activity levels: a longitudinal analysis of the EPIC-Norfolk cohort. Int J Obes. 2013;37(3):404–9.CrossRef
5.
Batsis JA, et al. Normal weight with central obesity, physical activity, and functional decline: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(8):1552–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Lee PH, et al. Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Lockwood J, et al. Comparison of a physical activity recall questionnaire with accelerometry in children and adolescents with obesity: a pilot study. Pediatr Obes. 2016;
8.
9.
Aguilar-Farias N, Brown WJ, Peeters GM. ActiGraph GT3X+ cut-points for identifying sedentary behaviour in older adults in free-living environments. J Sci Med Sport. 2014;17(3):293–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Hildebrand M, et al. Age group comparability of raw accelerometer output from wrist- and hip-worn monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(9):1816–24.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Doherty A, et al. Large scale population assessment of physical activity using wrist worn accelerometers: the UK biobank study. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0169649.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Esliger DW, et al. Validation of the GENEA accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(6):1085–93.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zhang S, et al. Physical activity classification using the GENEA wrist-worn accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(4):742–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Rowlands AV, et al. Sedentary sphere: wrist-worn accelerometer-brand independent posture classification. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(4):748–54.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Sabia S, et al. Association between questionnaire- and accelerometer-assessed physical activity: the role of sociodemographic factors. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179(6):781–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Bellocco R, et al. Effects of physical activity, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio and waist circumference on total mortality risk in the Swedish National March Cohort. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(11):777–88.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Shuger SL, et al. Body mass index as a predictor of hypertension incidence among initially healthy normotensive women. Am J Hypertens. 2008;21(6):613–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Shah NR, Braverman ER. Measuring adiposity in patients: the utility of body mass index (BMI), percent body fat, and leptin. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e33308.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Chouinard LE, et al. Bioelectrical impedance vs. four-compartment model to assess body fat change in overweight adults. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007;15(1):85–92.CrossRef
20.
Buchholz AC, Bartok C, Schoeller DA. The validity of bioelectrical impedance models in clinical populations. Nutr Clin Pract. 2004;19(5):433–46.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Lee CM, et al. Indices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than BMI: a meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(7):646–53.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Kinnunen TI, et al. Agreement between pedometer and accelerometer in measuring physical activity in overweight and obese pregnant women. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:501.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
van Hees VT, et al. Separating movement and gravity components in an acceleration signal and implications for the assessment of human daily physical activity. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61691.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Parkka J, et al. Activity classification using realistic data from wearable sensors. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2006;10(1):119–28.CrossRefPubMed
25.
WHO, Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser, 2000. 894: p. i-xii, 1–253.
26.
Donnelly JE, et al. American college of sports medicine position stand. Appropriate physical activity intervention strategies for weight loss and prevention of weight regain for adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(2):459–71.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Institute, N.I.O.H.A.N.H.L.a.B., Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults--The Evidence Report. National Institutes of Health. Obes Res, 1998 6 Suppl 2: p. 51S–209S.
28.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8(2):135–60.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Allender S, et al. The burden of smoking-related ill health in the UK. Tob Control. 2009;18(4):262–7.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Balakrishnan R, et al. The burden of alcohol-related ill health in the United Kingdom. J Public Health (Oxf). 2009;31(3):366–73.CrossRef
31.
Bergsmann E, et al. Evaluation of competence-based teaching in higher education: from theory to practice. Eval Program Plann. 2015;52:1–9.CrossRefPubMed
32.
van Hees, V.T., et al. A method to compare new and traditional accelerometry data in physical activity monitoring. in World of wireless mobile and multimedia networks (WoWMoM), 2010 IEEE international symposium on a. 2010.
33.
Rowlands AV, et al. Moving forward with backward compatibility: translating wrist accelerometer data. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(11):2142–9.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Silsbury Z, et al. Systematic review of the measurement properties of self-report physical activity questionnaires in healthy adult populations. BMJ Open. 2015;15:5
35.
36.
Wijndaele K, et al. Utilization and harmonization of adult Accelerometry data: review and expert consensus. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;
37.
Clark BK, et al. Past-day recall of sedentary time: validity of a self-reported measure of sedentary time in a university population. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(3):237–41.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Gomersall SR, et al. Validity of a self-report recall tool for estimating sedentary behavior in adults. J Phys Act Health. 2015;12(11):1485–91.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Clark BK, et al. Relationship of television time with accelerometer-derived sedentary time: NHANES. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(5):822–8.CrossRefPubMed
40.
41.
Rowlands AV, Stiles VH. Accelerometer counts and raw acceleration output in relation to mechanical loading. J Biomech. 2012;45(3):448-54.
42.
Rosenberger ME, et al. Estimating activity and sedentary behavior from an accelerometer on the hip or wrist. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(5):964–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
44.
45.
46.
Rowlands AV, et al. Raw accelerometer data analysis with GGIR R-package: does accelerometer brand matter? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;
47.
48.
Valenti G, Bonomi AG, Westerterp KR. Walking as a contributor to physical activity in healthy older adults: 2 week longitudinal study using Accelerometry and the doubly labeled water method. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016;4(2):e56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Audrey S, Procter S, Cooper AR. The contribution of walking to work to adult physical activity levels: a cross sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11(1):37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
Levine JA, et al. The role of free-living daily walking in human weight gain and obesity. Diabetes. 2008;57(3):548–54.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Jiang H, et al. Can physical activity reduce excessive gestational weight gain? Findings from a Chinese urban pregnant women cohort study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
Bonomi AG, et al. Weight-loss induced changes in physical activity and activity energy expenditure in overweight and obese subjects before and after energy restriction. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59641.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
53.
Saunders TJ, et al. Validity of SC-StepRx pedometer-derived moderate and vigorous physical activity during treadmill walking and running in a heterogeneous sample of children and youth. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:519.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
54.
Papadopoulos A, et al. Differentiating walking from other activities of daily living in older adults using wrist-based accelerometers. Curr Aging Sci. 2015;8(3):266–75.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Barnett A, et al. Validity of treadmill- and track-based individual calibration methods for estimating free-living walking speed and VO2 using the Actigraph accelerometer. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2015;7:29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
56.
57.
Conklin AI, et al. Socioeconomic status, financial hardship and measured obesity in older adults: a cross-sectional study of the EPIC-Norfolk cohort. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1039.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
58.
Fitzgerald L, et al. Accelerometer validation of questionnaires used in clinical settings to assess MVPA. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(7):1538–42.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Oyeyemi AL, et al. Accelerometer-determined physical activity and its comparison with the international physical activity questionnaire in a sample of Nigerian adults. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e87233.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
60.
Ainsworth BE, et al. Recommendations to improve the accuracy of estimates of physical activity derived from self report. J Phys Act Health, 2012 9 Suppl. 1:S76–84.
61.
Stabler ME, Giacobbi PR Jr, Fekedulegn DB. Association of television viewing time with overweight/obesity independent of meeting physical activity guidelines: do joint exposures yield independence? J Epidemiol. 2013;23(5):396–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
62.
Swartz AM, et al. Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9 Suppl):S450–6.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Raiber L, et al. Accelerometer thresholds: accounting for body mass reduces discrepancies between measures of physical activity for individuals with overweight and obesity. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2017;42(1):53–8.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Sergi G, et al. Resting VO2, maximal VO2 and metabolic equivalents in free-living healthy elderly women. Clin Nutr. 2010;29(1):84–8.CrossRefPubMed
65.
Welch WA, et al. Classification accuracy of the wrist-worn gravity estimator of normal everyday activity accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(10):2012–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
66.
Regaieg S, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of a modified version of the international physical activity questionnaire for adolescents (IPAQ-A) in Tunisian overweight and obese youths. Med Princ Pract. 2016;25(3):227–32.CrossRefPubMed
67.
Bell R, et al. Measuring physical activity in pregnancy: a comparison of accelerometry and self-completion questionnaires in overweight and obese women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(1):90–5.CrossRefPubMed
68.
Connor Gorber, S. and M.S. Tremblay, The bias in self-reported obesity from 1976 to 2005: a Canada-US comparison. Obesity (Silver Spring), 2010 18(2): p. 354–61.
69.
Ng M, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. 2014;
70.
Holme I, Tonstad S. Survival in elderly men in relation to midlife and current BMI. Age Ageing. 2015;44(3):434–9.CrossRefPubMed
71.
Kivimaki M, et al. Optimal form of operationalizing BMI in relation to all-cause and cause-specific mortality: the original Whitehall study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16(8):1926–32.CrossRef
72.
Kim KS, et al. A comparison between BMI and Conicity index on predicting coronary heart disease. the Framingham Heart Study Ann Epidemiol. 2000;10(7):424–31.PubMed
73.
Elia M. Body composition by whole-body bioelectrical impedance and prediction of clinically relevant outcomes: overvalued or underused? Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67(Suppl 1):S60–70.CrossRefPubMed
74.
Gaba A, et al. Comparison of multi- and single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of body composition in post-menopausal women: effects of body mass index and accelerometer-determined physical activity. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015;28(4):390–400.CrossRefPubMed
75.
Kim JY, et al. Comparability and utility of body composition measurement vs. anthropometric measurement for assessing obesity related health risks in Korean men. Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67(1):73–80.CrossRefPubMed
76.
Abete I, et al. Association between different obesity measures and the risk of stroke in the EPIC Spanish cohort. Eur J Nutr. 2015;54(3):365–75.CrossRefPubMed
77.
Gateva AT, Kamenov ZA. Markers of visceral obesity and cardiovascular risk in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;164(2):161–6.CrossRefPubMed
78.
Sabia S, et al. Physical activity and adiposity markers at older ages: accelerometer vs questionnaire data. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(5):438.e7–13.CrossRef
79.
Foong YC, et al. The association between physical activity and reduced body fat lessens with age - results from a cross-sectional study in community-dwelling older adults. Exp Gerontol. 2014;55:107–12.CrossRefPubMed
80.
Harris TJ, et al. A comparison of questionnaire, accelerometer, and pedometer: measures in older people. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(7):1392–402.CrossRefPubMed
81.
Skender S, et al. Accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires - a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:515.
82.
Bauman AE, et al. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet. 2012;380(9838):258–71.CrossRefPubMed
83.
Flum DR, et al. Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(5):445–54.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Using open source accelerometer analysis to assess physical activity and sedentary behaviour in overweight and obese adults
Authors
Paul Innerd
Rory Harrison
Morc Coulson
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5215-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Public Health 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

Epidemiology and factors associated with amoebic liver abscess in northern Sri Lanka

Research article

Body image as risk factor for emotional and behavioral problems among Chinese adolescents

Research article

The public health emergency management system in China: trends from 2002 to 2012

Research article

Disease awareness campaigns in printed and online media in Latvia: cross-sectional study on consistency with WHO ethical criteria for medicinal drug promotion and European standards

Research article

The correlation between family food handling behaviors and foodborne acute gastroenteritis: a community-oriented, population-based survey in Anhui, China

Correction

Correction to: Tailoring lifestyle interventions to low socio-economic populations: a qualitative study