Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 1/2012

01-03-2012 | Original paper

Using a smokeless tobacco control mass media campaign and other synergistic elements to address social inequalities in India

Authors: Tahir Turk, Nandita Murukutla, Shefali Gupta, Jagdish Kaur, Sandra Mullin, Ranjana Saradhi, Pankaj Chaturvedi

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Special Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The burden of tobacco-related morbidity and mortality in India is substantial, with smokeless tobacco being the predominant form of tobacco use. Use of smokeless tobacco (for example gutkha, paan, khaini, and pan masala) is linked to a host of socioeconomic and cultural factors including gender, regional differences, educational level, and income disparities. Given the scale of the problem, a national social marketing campaign was developed and implemented. The creative approach used testimonials from a surgeon and patients at Tata Memorial Hospital in Mumbai. The communication message approach was designed to reflect the realities of disfiguring, disabling, and fatal cancers caused by smokeless tobacco. Evaluation of the campaign identified significant differences across a range of campaign behavioral predictors by audience segments aware of the campaign versus those who were “campaign unaware”. Significant findings were also identified regarding vulnerable groups by gender (female/male) and rural/urban disparities. Findings are discussed in relation to the powerful impact of using graphic, emotive, and testimonial imagery for tobacco control with socially disadvantaged groups.
Footnotes
2
We used the modern SES definition which uses education and occupation of the chief wage earner to classify households in urban areas. The chief wage earner is defined as the person who contributes the most to the total family income. On the basis of various combinations of these variables, the households are classified into different socioeconomic classes from A–E (in that order, from affluent to deprived). Households in rural areas are classified using the chief wage earner’s education and type of house (“pucca” houses are those built of concrete and steel; “kaccha” include thatched houses or huts; and, “semi pucca” are those that are a mix of concrete and thatching). Occupation as a variable is not used in rural areas because this can be similar in most households across most Indian villages. Rural SEC is categorized into four groups on the basis of the education and type of household, viz. R1, R2, R3 and R4. R1 denotes the upper-most rural SEC and R4 the lowest SEC.(The definition can be viewed at: http://​www.​mruc.​net/​images/​stories/​Glossary_​KeyIRSDefinition​s.​pdf.) Socio-economic status was further categorized into “High” (A and R1), “Medium” (B, C and R2), and “Low” (D, E, R3 and R4).
 
3
The website may be viewed at http://​www.​chewonthis.​in/​
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference World Health Organisation [WHO] (2010) Global adult tobacco survey [GATS] India Report 2009–2010 World Health Organisation [WHO] (2010) Global adult tobacco survey [GATS] India Report 2009–2010
3.
go back to reference Jha P et al (2008) A nationally representative case–control study of smoking and death in India. N Eng J Med 358:1137–1147CrossRef Jha P et al (2008) A nationally representative case–control study of smoking and death in India. N Eng J Med 358:1137–1147CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Engstrom PE, Clapper M, Schnoll RA et al (2000) Prevention of tobacco-related cancers. In: Bast RC, Kufe D, Pollock RE et al (eds) Cancer medicine, 5th edn. BC Decker, Hamilton, pp 127–140 Engstrom PE, Clapper M, Schnoll RA et al (2000) Prevention of tobacco-related cancers. In: Bast RC, Kufe D, Pollock RE et al (eds) Cancer medicine, 5th edn. BC Decker, Hamilton, pp 127–140
7.
go back to reference Ray CS, Gupta PC (2009) Bidis and smokeless tobacco. Curr Sci 96(10):1324–1333 Ray CS, Gupta PC (2009) Bidis and smokeless tobacco. Curr Sci 96(10):1324–1333
8.
go back to reference International agency for research on cancer monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans (2007) Smokeless tobacco and some tobacco-specific N-Nitrosamines. 89, WHO, Lyon International agency for research on cancer monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans (2007) Smokeless tobacco and some tobacco-specific N-Nitrosamines. 89, WHO, Lyon
9.
go back to reference European Commission (2007) Health effects of smokeless tobacco products. Preliminary report, Brussels European Commission (2007) Health effects of smokeless tobacco products. Preliminary report, Brussels
12.
go back to reference Parasuraman S, Kishor S, Singh SK, Vaidehi, Y (2009) A profile of youth in India. National Family Health Survey [NFHS-3] India 2005–2006. ICF Macro, Calverton Parasuraman S, Kishor S, Singh SK, Vaidehi, Y (2009) A profile of youth in India. National Family Health Survey [NFHS-3] India 2005–2006. ICF Macro, Calverton
13.
go back to reference Gupta PC (1996) Survey of sociodemographic characteristics of tobacco use among 99,598 individuals in Bombay, India using handheld computers. Tob Control Summer 5(2):114–120CrossRef Gupta PC (1996) Survey of sociodemographic characteristics of tobacco use among 99,598 individuals in Bombay, India using handheld computers. Tob Control Summer 5(2):114–120CrossRef
14.
go back to reference John RM (2008) Crowding out effect of tobacco expenditure and its implications on household resource allocation in India. Soc Sci Med 66(6):1356–1367 John RM (2008) Crowding out effect of tobacco expenditure and its implications on household resource allocation in India. Soc Sci Med 66(6):1356–1367
15.
go back to reference Chaturvedi HK, Phukan RK, Zoramtharga K, Hazarika NC, Mahanta J (1998) Tobacco use in Mizoram, India: sociodemographic differences in pattern. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Pub Health 29(1):66–70 Chaturvedi HK, Phukan RK, Zoramtharga K, Hazarika NC, Mahanta J (1998) Tobacco use in Mizoram, India: sociodemographic differences in pattern. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Pub Health 29(1):66–70
16.
go back to reference Narain R, Sardana S, Gupta S, Sehgal A (2011) Age at initiation and prevalence of tobacco use among school children in Noida, India: a cross-sectional questionnaire based survey. Indian J Med Res 133:300–307PubMed Narain R, Sardana S, Gupta S, Sehgal A (2011) Age at initiation and prevalence of tobacco use among school children in Noida, India: a cross-sectional questionnaire based survey. Indian J Med Res 133:300–307PubMed
18.
go back to reference John R, et al (2011) Counting 15 million more poor in India, thanks to tobacco. Tob Control 20:349–352 John R, et al (2011) Counting 15 million more poor in India, thanks to tobacco. Tob Control 20:349–352
19.
go back to reference Terry-McElrath Y, Wakefield M, Ruel E, Balch GI, Emery S, Szczypka G, Clegg-Smith K, Flay B (2005) The effect of antismoking advertisement executional characteristics on youth comprehension, appraisal, recall, and engagement. J Health Commun 10(2):127–143PubMedCrossRef Terry-McElrath Y, Wakefield M, Ruel E, Balch GI, Emery S, Szczypka G, Clegg-Smith K, Flay B (2005) The effect of antismoking advertisement executional characteristics on youth comprehension, appraisal, recall, and engagement. J Health Commun 10(2):127–143PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wakefield M, Bayly M, Durkin S, Cotter T, Mullin S, Warne C, for the International Anti-Tobacco Advertisement Rating Study Team (2011) Smokers’ responses to television advertisements about the serious harms of tobacco use: pre-testing results from 10 low- to middle-income countries. Tob Control; tobaccocontrol-2011-050171. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050171 Wakefield M, Bayly M, Durkin S, Cotter T, Mullin S, Warne C, for the International Anti-Tobacco Advertisement Rating Study Team (2011) Smokers’ responses to television advertisements about the serious harms of tobacco use: pre-testing results from 10 low- to middle-income countries. Tob Control; tobaccocontrol-2011-050171. doi:10.​1136/​tobaccocontrol-2011-050171
21.
go back to reference Berlo D, Lemert J, Mertz R (1969) Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message source. Pub Opin Quart 33:563–576CrossRef Berlo D, Lemert J, Mertz R (1969) Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message source. Pub Opin Quart 33:563–576CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Cooper J, Croyle R (1984) Attitudes and attitude change. Ann Rev Psych 35:395–426CrossRef Cooper J, Croyle R (1984) Attitudes and attitude change. Ann Rev Psych 35:395–426CrossRef
23.
go back to reference National Cancer Institute (NCI) (2008) The role of the media in promoting and reducing tobacco use. In: Davis RM, Gilpin EA, Loken B, Viswanath K, Wakefield MA (eds) Tobacco control monograph No. 19. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. NIH Pub No 07-6242, Bethesda National Cancer Institute (NCI) (2008) The role of the media in promoting and reducing tobacco use. In: Davis RM, Gilpin EA, Loken B, Viswanath K, Wakefield MA (eds) Tobacco control monograph No. 19. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. NIH Pub No 07-6242, Bethesda
24.
go back to reference Clow KE, Baack D (2007) Integrated advertising, promotion, and marketing communications, 3rd edn. Pearson Ed, Upper Saddle River, NJ Clow KE, Baack D (2007) Integrated advertising, promotion, and marketing communications, 3rd edn. Pearson Ed, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Metadata
Title
Using a smokeless tobacco control mass media campaign and other synergistic elements to address social inequalities in India
Authors
Tahir Turk
Nandita Murukutla
Shefali Gupta
Jagdish Kaur
Sandra Mullin
Ranjana Saradhi
Pankaj Chaturvedi
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue Special Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-012-9903-3

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2012

Cancer Causes & Control 1/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine