Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Health Research Policy and Systems
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Review

User involvement in the implementation of clinical guidelines for common mental health disorders: a review and compilation of strategies and resources

Authors: Eliana M. Moreno, Juan Antonio Moriana

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is now broad consensus regarding the importance of involving users in the process of implementing guidelines. Few studies, however, have addressed this issue, let alone the implementation of guidelines for common mental health disorders. The aim of this study is to compile and describe implementation strategies and resources related to common clinical mental health disorders targeted at service users.

Methods

The literature was reviewed and resources for the implementation of clinical guidelines were compiled using the PRISMA model. A mixed qualitative and quantitative analysis was performed based on a series of categories developed ad hoc.

Results

A total of 263 items were included in the preliminary analysis and 64 implementation resources aimed at users were analysed in depth. A wide variety of types, sources and formats were identified, including guides (40%), websites (29%), videos and leaflets, as well as instruments for the implementation of strategies regarding information and education (64%), self-care, or users’ assessment of service quality.

Conclusions

The results reveal the need to establish clear criteria for assessing the quality of implementation materials in general and standardising systems to classify user-targeted strategies. The compilation and description of key elements of strategies and resources for users can be of interest in designing materials and specific actions for this target audience, as well as improving the implementation of clinical guidelines.
Literature
1.
2.
Van Dulmen SA, Lukersmith S, Muxlow J, Santa Mina E, Nijuis-van der Sanden MW, van der Wees, G-I-N Allied Health Steering Group. Supporting a person-centred approach in clinical guidelines. A position paper of the Allied Health Community-Guidelines International Network (G-I-N). Health Expect. 2015;18(5):1543–58. doi:10.​1111/​hex.​12144.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Occlo JE, Fulop NJ. Developing a critical approach to patient and public involvement in patient safety in the NHS: learning lesson from other parts of the public sector? Health Expect. 2012;15:424–32.CrossRef
4.
Park MM, Zafran H, Stewart J, Salberg J, Ells C, Rouleau S, et al. Transforming mental health services: a participatory mixed methods study to promote and evaluate the implementation of recovery-oriented service. Implement Sci. 2014;9:119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
6.
Gold PB, Glynn SM, Muesser KT. Challenges to implementing and sustaining comprehensive mental health service programs. Eval Health Prof. 2006;29:195–218.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Thtornicroft G, Alem A, Antunes-Dos Santos R, Barley E, Drake R, et al. WPA Guidance on step, obstacles and mistakes to avoid in the implementation of community mental health care. World Psychiatry. 2010;9:67–77.CrossRef
8.
Crawford MJ, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Bhui K, Fulop N, et al. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. Br Med J. 2002;325:1–5.CrossRef
9.
Wallcraft J, Amering M, Freidin J, Davar B, Froggatt D, Jafri H, et al. Partnerships for better mental health worldwide: WPA recommendations on best practice in working with service users and family carers. World Psychiatry. 2011;10:229–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Tait L, Lester H. Encouraging user involvement in mental health services. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2005;11:168–75.CrossRef
11.
12.
Coulter A, Ellins J. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. Br Med J. 2007;335:24–7.CrossRef
13.
Gillard S, Adams K, Edwards C, Lucock M, Miller S, Simons L, et al. Self Care in Mental Health research team. Informing the development of service supporting self-care for severe, long term mental health conditions: a mixed method study of community based mental health initiatives in England. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:189. doi:10.​1186/​1472-6963-12-189.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Harding E, Pettinari CJ, Brown D, Hayward M, Taylor C. Service user involvement in clinical guideline development and implementation: learning from mental health service users in the UK. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2011;22:352–7.CrossRef
15.
Boivin A, Currie K, Fervers B, García J, James M, Marshall C, et al. Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:e22.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Légaré F, Boivin A, van der Weijden T, Pakenham C, Burgers J, Légaré J, et al. Patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: a knowledge synthesis of existing programs. Med Decis Making. 2011;31:e45–74.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann HJ. What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ. 2008;336:995–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
World Health Organization. Research for universal health coverage: World Health Report 2013. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
20.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence NICE. The Guidelines Manual. Process and methods guide. London: NICE; 2012.
21.
Van Dulmen SA, Meas M, Staal JB, Rutten G, Kiers H, Nijhuis-van der Sanden M, et al. Effectiveness of pear assessment for implementing a doutch physical therapy low back pain guideline: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2014;94:1396–409.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Franx G, Dixon L, Wensing M, Pincus H. Implementation strategies for collaborative primary care mental health models. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2013;26:502–10.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Dwamena F, Holmes-Rovner M, Gaulden CM, Jorgenson S, Sadigh G, Sikorskii A, et al. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD003267. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD003267.​pub2.PubMed
24.
Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Research into practice I. Lancet. 2003;362:1225–30.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Mazza D, Bairstow P, Buchan H, Chakraborty P, Van Hecke O, Grech C, et al. Refining a taxonomy for guideline implementation: results of an exercise in abstract classification. Implement Sci. 2013;8:32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
27.
Urrutia G, Bonfill X. Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Med Clin (Barc). 2010;135:507–11.CrossRef
28.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group. Data collection checklist. Ontario: Institute of Population Health, University of Ottawa; 2011.
38.
Flodgren G, Eccles MP, Grimshaw J, Leng GC, Shepperd S. Tools developed and disseminated by guideline producers to promote the uptake of their guidelines. Cochrane Library. 2013. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD010669.
39.
Powell BJ, McMillen JC, Proctor EK, Carpenter CR, Griffey RT, Bunger AC, et al. A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health. Med Care Res Rev. 2012;69:123–57.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Powell BJ, Proctor EK, Glass JE. A systematic review of strategies for implementing empirically supported mental health interventions. Res Soc Work Pract. 2014;24:192–212.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015;10:21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Gagliardi AR, Brouwers MC, Palda VA, Lemieux-Charles L, Grimshaw JM. How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability. Implement Sci. 2011;6:26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Rashidian A, Eccles MP, Russell I. Falling on stony ground? A qualitative study of implementation of clinical guidelines’ prescribing recommendations in primary care. Health Policy. 2008;85:148–61.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Banfield MA, Barney LJ, Grififiths KM, Christensen HM. Australian Mental health consumers priorities for research: Qualitative findings from the SCOPE for research project. Health Expect. 2014;17:365–75.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Owens C, Ley A, Aitken P. Do different stakeholder groups share mental health research priorities? A four-arm Delphi study. Health Expect. 2008;11:418–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Tlach L, Wüsten C, Daubmann A, Liebherz S, Härter M, Dirmaier J. Information and decision-making needs among people with mental disorders: A systematic review of the literature. Health Expect. 2015;18(6):1856–72. doi:10.​1111/​hex.​12251.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Berry K, Haddock G. The implementation of the NICE guidelines for schizophrenia: Barriers to the implementation of psychological interventions and recommendations for the future. Psychol Psychother. 2008;81:419–36.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Legaré F, Boivin A, Van der Weijden T, Pakenham C, Tapp S, Burguers J. A knowledge synthesis of patient and public involvement in clinical practice guideline: study protocol. Implem Sci. 2009;4:30.CrossRef
49.
50.
51.
Metadata
Title
User involvement in the implementation of clinical guidelines for common mental health disorders: a review and compilation of strategies and resources
Authors
Eliana M. Moreno
Juan Antonio Moriana
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0135-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research

The development of ORACLe: a measure of an organisation’s capacity to engage in evidence-informed health policy

Research

Views from senior Australian cancer researchers on evaluating the impact of their research: results from a brief survey

Study Protocol

Simulation modelling as a tool for knowledge mobilisation in health policy settings: a case study protocol

Research

Malaria research and its influence on anti-malarial drug policy in Malawi: a case study

Commentary

Harmonisation and standardisation of health sector and programme reviews and evaluations – how can they better inform health policy dialogue?

Research

Similarities and differences between stakeholders’ opinions on using Health Technology Assessment (HTA) information across five European countries: results from the EQUIPT survey