Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 4/2011

01-12-2011 | Original Article

Usefulness of psyllium in rehabilitation of obstructed defecation

Authors: F. Pucciani, M. Raggioli, M. N. Ringressi

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Rehabilitation is the first therapeutic step of obstructed defecation, after failure of conservative therapy with high-fiber diet and laxatives. This study evaluates the usefulness of psyllium, a bulk-forming agent, when used during rehabilitation of obstructed defecation.

Methods

Between January 2008 and December 2010, 45 patients affected by obstructed defecation were included in the study. Two randomized groups were selected. Group 1 (21 women; age range 25–67 (mean, 51.8) years) continued to consume a high-fiber diet (approximately 30 g fiber per day) during rehabilitation. Group 2 (24 women; age range 46–71 (mean, 59.8) years) consumed only psyllium (3.6 g × 2/day; Psyllogel® Fibra, Nathura, Montecchio Emilia, Italy) during the rehabilitative cycle. After a preliminary clinical evaluation, including the obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) score, patients underwent defecography and anorectal manometry as well as rehabilitative treatment according to the “multimodal rehabilitative program” for obstructive defecation. At the end of the program, patients were reassessed by clinical evaluation and anorectal manometry. Post-rehabilitative ODS scores were used for an arbitrary schedule of patients divided into three classes: Class I, good (score ≤ 4); Class II, fair (score > 4 to ≤ 8); Class III, poor (score > 8).

Results

The number of bowel movements per week did not increase significantly after rehabilitation. Both groups had a significantly better Bristol stool form scale score (Group 1: P < 0.034; Group 2: P < 0.02). The overall mean ODS score from Groups 1 and 2 showed significant improvement after treatment (P < 0.001). Twenty-eight patients (82.3%) were Class I (good results) without significant differences between groups. Nine women were symptom-free. Significant differences were found between pre-rehabilitative and post-rehabilitative manometric data from the straining test (P < 0.001) and duration of maximal voluntary contraction (Group 1: P < 0.004; Group 2: P < 0.02). A significant difference was found between the pre-rehabilitative and post-rehabilitative conscious rectal sensitivity threshold (CRST) in Group 2 women (P < 0.02). The Group 2 women who underwent volumetric rehabilitation (11 patients) had significantly lower post-rehabilitative CRST values than pre-rehabilitative values (P < 0.002); the length of volumetric rehabilitation was also significantly shorter in Group 2 patients (P < 0.04) than in Group 1 patients.

Conclusions

After rehabilitation of obstructed defecation, some patients became symptom-free and many had an improved ODS score. Psyllium is helpful for volumetric rehabilitation: patients who consumed psyllium had lower post-rehabilitative CRST values than subjects were on high-fiber diet.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Bouchoucha M, Faye A, Savarieau B, Arsac M (2004) Effect of an oral bulking agent and a rectal laxative administered alone or in combination for the treatment of constipation. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 28:438–443PubMedCrossRef Bouchoucha M, Faye A, Savarieau B, Arsac M (2004) Effect of an oral bulking agent and a rectal laxative administered alone or in combination for the treatment of constipation. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 28:438–443PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ramkumar D, Rao SS (2005) Efficacy and safety of traditional medical therapy for chronic constipation: systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 100:936–971PubMedCrossRef Ramkumar D, Rao SS (2005) Efficacy and safety of traditional medical therapy for chronic constipation: systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 100:936–971PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Andromanakos N, Skandalakis P, Troupis T, Filippou D (2006) Constipation of anorectal outlet obstruction: pathophysiology, evaluation and management. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21:638–646PubMedCrossRef Andromanakos N, Skandalakis P, Troupis T, Filippou D (2006) Constipation of anorectal outlet obstruction: pathophysiology, evaluation and management. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21:638–646PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference O’Donnell LJ, Virjee J, Heaton KW (1988) Pseudo-diarrhoea in the irritable bowel syndrome: patients’ records of stool form reflect transit time while stool frequency does not. Gut 29:A1455 O’Donnell LJ, Virjee J, Heaton KW (1988) Pseudo-diarrhoea in the irritable bowel syndrome: patients’ records of stool form reflect transit time while stool frequency does not. Gut 29:A1455
7.
go back to reference Bharucha AE, Wald A, Enck P, Rao S (2006) Functional anorectal disorders. Gastroenterology 130:1510–1518PubMedCrossRef Bharucha AE, Wald A, Enck P, Rao S (2006) Functional anorectal disorders. Gastroenterology 130:1510–1518PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Altomare DF, Spazzafumo L, Rinaldi M, Dodi G, Ghiselli R, Piloni V (2008) Set-up and statistical validation of a new scoring system for obstructed defaecation syndrome. Colorectal Dis 10:84–88PubMed Altomare DF, Spazzafumo L, Rinaldi M, Dodi G, Ghiselli R, Piloni V (2008) Set-up and statistical validation of a new scoring system for obstructed defaecation syndrome. Colorectal Dis 10:84–88PubMed
9.
go back to reference Piloni V, Genovesi N, Grassi R, Lazzini S, Pieri L, Pomerri F (1993) National working team report on defecography. Radiol Med 85:784–793PubMed Piloni V, Genovesi N, Grassi R, Lazzini S, Pieri L, Pomerri F (1993) National working team report on defecography. Radiol Med 85:784–793PubMed
10.
go back to reference Pucciani F, Rottoli ML, Bologna A et al (1996) Anterior rectocele and anorectal dysfunction. Int J Colorectal Dis 11:1–9PubMedCrossRef Pucciani F, Rottoli ML, Bologna A et al (1996) Anterior rectocele and anorectal dysfunction. Int J Colorectal Dis 11:1–9PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Martelli H, Devroede G, Arhan P, Duguay C, Dornic C, Faverdin C (1978) Some parameters of large bowel motility in normal man. Gastroenterology 75:612–618PubMed Martelli H, Devroede G, Arhan P, Duguay C, Dornic C, Faverdin C (1978) Some parameters of large bowel motility in normal man. Gastroenterology 75:612–618PubMed
12.
go back to reference Pucciani F, Rottoli ML, Bologna A et al (1998) Pelvic floor dyssynergia and bimodal rehabilitation: results of combined pelviperineal kinesitherapy and biofeedback training. Int J Colorectal Dis 13:124–130PubMedCrossRef Pucciani F, Rottoli ML, Bologna A et al (1998) Pelvic floor dyssynergia and bimodal rehabilitation: results of combined pelviperineal kinesitherapy and biofeedback training. Int J Colorectal Dis 13:124–130PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pucciani F, Ringressi MN, Redditi S, Masi A, Giani I (2008) Rehabilitation of fecal incontinence after sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer: encouraging results. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1552–1558PubMedCrossRef Pucciani F, Ringressi MN, Redditi S, Masi A, Giani I (2008) Rehabilitation of fecal incontinence after sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer: encouraging results. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1552–1558PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Khaikin M, Wexner SD (2006) Treatment strategies in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence. World J Gastroenterol 12:3168–3173PubMed Khaikin M, Wexner SD (2006) Treatment strategies in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence. World J Gastroenterol 12:3168–3173PubMed
15.
go back to reference Camilleri M, Bharucha AE (2010) Behavioural and new pharmacological treatments for constipation: getting the balance right. Gut 59:1288–1296PubMedCrossRef Camilleri M, Bharucha AE (2010) Behavioural and new pharmacological treatments for constipation: getting the balance right. Gut 59:1288–1296PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chiarioni G, Heymen S, Whitehead WE (2006) Biofeedback therapy for dyssynergic defecation. World J Gastroenterol 12:7069–7074PubMed Chiarioni G, Heymen S, Whitehead WE (2006) Biofeedback therapy for dyssynergic defecation. World J Gastroenterol 12:7069–7074PubMed
17.
go back to reference Heymen S, Jones KR, Scarlett Y, Whitehead WE (2003) Biofeedback treatment of constipation: a critical review. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1208–1217PubMedCrossRef Heymen S, Jones KR, Scarlett Y, Whitehead WE (2003) Biofeedback treatment of constipation: a critical review. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1208–1217PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Palsson OS, Heymen S, Whitehead WE (2004) Biofeedback treatment for functional anorectal disorders: a comprehensive efficacy review. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 29:153–174PubMedCrossRef Palsson OS, Heymen S, Whitehead WE (2004) Biofeedback treatment for functional anorectal disorders: a comprehensive efficacy review. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 29:153–174PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Koh CE, Young CJ, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2008) Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the effectiveness of biofeedback for pelvic floor dysfunction. Br J Surg 95:1079–1087PubMedCrossRef Koh CE, Young CJ, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2008) Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the effectiveness of biofeedback for pelvic floor dysfunction. Br J Surg 95:1079–1087PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Cheskin LJ, Kamal N, Crowell MD, Schuster MM, Whitehead WE (1995) Mechanisms of constipation in older persons and effects of fiber compared with placebo. J Am Geriatr Soc 43:666–669PubMed Cheskin LJ, Kamal N, Crowell MD, Schuster MM, Whitehead WE (1995) Mechanisms of constipation in older persons and effects of fiber compared with placebo. J Am Geriatr Soc 43:666–669PubMed
21.
go back to reference Attaluri A, Donahoe R, Valestin J, Brown K, Rao SS (2011) Randomised clinical trial: dried plums (prunes) vs psyllium for constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 33:822–828PubMedCrossRef Attaluri A, Donahoe R, Valestin J, Brown K, Rao SS (2011) Randomised clinical trial: dried plums (prunes) vs psyllium for constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 33:822–828PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Stevens J, VanSoest PJ, Robertson JB, Levitsky DA (1988) Comparison of the effects of Psyllium and wheat bran on gastrointestinal transit time and stool characteristics. J Am Diet Assoc 88:323–326PubMed Stevens J, VanSoest PJ, Robertson JB, Levitsky DA (1988) Comparison of the effects of Psyllium and wheat bran on gastrointestinal transit time and stool characteristics. J Am Diet Assoc 88:323–326PubMed
23.
go back to reference Marteau P, Flourié B, Cherbut C et al (1994) Digestibility and bulking effect of ispaghula husks in healthy humans. Gut 35:1747–1752PubMedCrossRef Marteau P, Flourié B, Cherbut C et al (1994) Digestibility and bulking effect of ispaghula husks in healthy humans. Gut 35:1747–1752PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Usefulness of psyllium in rehabilitation of obstructed defecation
Authors
F. Pucciani
M. Raggioli
M. N. Ringressi
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0722-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Techniques in Coloproctology 4/2011 Go to the issue