Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2010

01-04-2010

Use of Rigid Nephroscope for Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration—A Single-Center Experience

Authors: Muneer Khan, Syed Javid Farooq Qadri, Syed Sajad Nazir

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 4/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Increasingly, laparoscopic biliary surgeons are undertaking laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for patients with cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis. In laparoscopic common bile duct exploration a flexible choledochoscope is ordinarily used, and with this instrument the surgeon usually fails to remove large impacted stones. In contrast with use of a rigid nephroscope it is possible to remove all common bile duct stones irrespective of size and degree of impaction. The present study evaluates the efficiency of rigid nephroscope for managing common bile duct stones laparoscopically.

Methods

In the present study laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for stones was performed in 80 patients via standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy port sites. Patients with a common bile duct diameter >10 mm were included in this study. The rigid nephroscope was passed through the epigastric port and negotiated into the common bile duct through a choledochotomy. Stones were removed with graspers. Large hard stones were fragmented by pneumatic lithotripsy.

Results

Of the 80 patients treated in this manner, 72 (90%) had multiple common bile duct calculi, and 8 (10%) had a solitary common bile duct calculus. Mean common bile duct diameter was 15.3 mm (range: 10–37 mm). Conversion to open common bile duct exploration was necessary in 1 case (1.25%) because of difficult dissection secondary to extensive dense adhesions. In 7 patients (8.75%) a pneumatic lithotripter was used to fragment stones. Choledochotomy was managed by placing a T-tube in 21 (26.25%) patients, by effecting primary closure in 58 (72.5%) patients, and by choledochoduodenostomy in 1 (1.25%) patient. The mean operative time in this series was 83 min (range: 53–135 min). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 4.2 days (range: 3–19 days). One patient (1.25%) developed cholangitis 5 months after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration; the cause was a residual common bile duct stone.

Conclusions

A rigid nephroscope can be used for managing all types of common bile duct calculi irrespective of site, size, composition, or degree of impaction. Its use can be expected to become the standard for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, especially for removing large calculi from a dilated common bile duct.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nahrwold D (1986) The biliary system. In: Sabiston X (ed) Textbook of surgery. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia Nahrwold D (1986) The biliary system. In: Sabiston X (ed) Textbook of surgery. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia
2.
3.
go back to reference Cuschieri A, Croce E, Faggioni A et al (1996) EAES [European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons] ductal stone study. Preliminary findings of multi-center prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management. Surg Endosc 10:1130–1135CrossRefPubMed Cuschieri A, Croce E, Faggioni A et al (1996) EAES [European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons] ductal stone study. Preliminary findings of multi-center prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management. Surg Endosc 10:1130–1135CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Arregui M, Davis CJ, Arkush AM et al (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction or laparoscopic choledochoscopy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy for management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 6:10–15CrossRefPubMed Arregui M, Davis CJ, Arkush AM et al (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction or laparoscopic choledochoscopy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy for management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 6:10–15CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
7.
go back to reference Vitale GC, Larson GM, Wieman TJ et al (1993) The use of ERCP in the management of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 7:9–11CrossRefPubMed Vitale GC, Larson GM, Wieman TJ et al (1993) The use of ERCP in the management of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 7:9–11CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Carroll BJ, Phillips EH, Daykhovsky L et al (1992) Laparoscopic choledochoscopy: an effective approach to the common duct. J Laparoendosc Surg 2:15–21PubMed Carroll BJ, Phillips EH, Daykhovsky L et al (1992) Laparoscopic choledochoscopy: an effective approach to the common duct. J Laparoendosc Surg 2:15–21PubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Franklin ME, Pharand D (1994) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:119–124CrossRefPubMed Franklin ME, Pharand D (1994) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:119–124CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Phillips E, Carroll BJ, Pearlstein R et al (1993) Laparoscopic choledochoscopy and extraction of common bile duct stones. World J Surg 17:22–28CrossRefPubMed Phillips E, Carroll BJ, Pearlstein R et al (1993) Laparoscopic choledochoscopy and extraction of common bile duct stones. World J Surg 17:22–28CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Tranter Se, Thompson MH (2002) Comparison of endoscopic sphicterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of CBD. Br J Surg 89:1495–1504CrossRefPubMed Tranter Se, Thompson MH (2002) Comparison of endoscopic sphicterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of CBD. Br J Surg 89:1495–1504CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Sand J, Airo I, Hiltunen KM et al (1992) Changes in biliary bacteria after endoscopic cholangiography and sphincterotomy. Am Surg 58:324–328PubMed Sand J, Airo I, Hiltunen KM et al (1992) Changes in biliary bacteria after endoscopic cholangiography and sphincterotomy. Am Surg 58:324–328PubMed
15.
go back to reference Gupta P, Bhartia VK (2005) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: our experience. Indian J Surg 67:94–99 Gupta P, Bhartia VK (2005) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: our experience. Indian J Surg 67:94–99
16.
go back to reference Tanaka M, Takahta S, Konomi H et al (1998) Long-term consequences of endosphincterotomy for bile duct stones. Gastointest Endosc 48:465–469CrossRef Tanaka M, Takahta S, Konomi H et al (1998) Long-term consequences of endosphincterotomy for bile duct stones. Gastointest Endosc 48:465–469CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ekbom A, Hsieh C, Yuen J et al (1993) Risk of extrahepatic bile duct cancer after cholecystectomy. Lancet 342:1262–1265CrossRefPubMed Ekbom A, Hsieh C, Yuen J et al (1993) Risk of extrahepatic bile duct cancer after cholecystectomy. Lancet 342:1262–1265CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Leibermann MA, Philips EH, Carroll BJ et al (1996) Cost effective management of complicated choledocholithiasis: laparoscopic transcystic exploration vs ES. J Am Coll Surg 182:488–494 Leibermann MA, Philips EH, Carroll BJ et al (1996) Cost effective management of complicated choledocholithiasis: laparoscopic transcystic exploration vs ES. J Am Coll Surg 182:488–494
19.
go back to reference Martin IJ, Bailey IS, Rhodes M et al (1998) Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Am Surg 228:29–34 Martin IJ, Bailey IS, Rhodes M et al (1998) Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Am Surg 228:29–34
20.
go back to reference Wu JS, Soper NJ (2002) Comparison of laparoscopic choledochotomy closure techniques. Surg Endosc 16:1309–1313CrossRefPubMed Wu JS, Soper NJ (2002) Comparison of laparoscopic choledochotomy closure techniques. Surg Endosc 16:1309–1313CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Williams JAR, Treacy PJ, Sidey CS et al (1994) Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage following exploration of the common bile duct. Aust N Z J Surg 64:823–826CrossRefPubMed Williams JAR, Treacy PJ, Sidey CS et al (1994) Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage following exploration of the common bile duct. Aust N Z J Surg 64:823–826CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Lygidakis NJ (1983) Choledochotomy for biliary lithiasis: T-tube drainage or primary closure—effects on postoperative bacteremia and T-tube bile infection. Am J Surg 146:254–256CrossRefPubMed Lygidakis NJ (1983) Choledochotomy for biliary lithiasis: T-tube drainage or primary closure—effects on postoperative bacteremia and T-tube bile infection. Am J Surg 146:254–256CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Lygidakis NJ (1983) Operative risk factors of cholecystectomy–choledochotomy in the elderly. Surg Gynecol Obstet 157:l5–l19 Lygidakis NJ (1983) Operative risk factors of cholecystectomy–choledochotomy in the elderly. Surg Gynecol Obstet 157:l5–l19
24.
go back to reference Lygidakis NJ (1984) Incidence of bile infection in biliary lithiasis. Effects on postoperative bacteremia of choledochoduodenostomy, T-tube drainage, and primary closure of the common bile duct after choledochotomy—a prospective trial. Am Surg 50:236–240PubMed Lygidakis NJ (1984) Incidence of bile infection in biliary lithiasis. Effects on postoperative bacteremia of choledochoduodenostomy, T-tube drainage, and primary closure of the common bile duct after choledochotomy—a prospective trial. Am Surg 50:236–240PubMed
25.
go back to reference Koivusalo A, Mäkisalo H, Talja A et al (1996) Bacterial adherence and biofilm formation on latex and silicone T-tubes in relation to bacterial contamination of bile. Scand J Gastroenterol 31:398–403CrossRefPubMed Koivusalo A, Mäkisalo H, Talja A et al (1996) Bacterial adherence and biofilm formation on latex and silicone T-tubes in relation to bacterial contamination of bile. Scand J Gastroenterol 31:398–403CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Horgan PG, Campbell AC, Gray GR et al (1989) Biliary leakage and peritonitis following removal of T tubes after bile duct exploration. Br J Surg 76:1296–1297CrossRefPubMed Horgan PG, Campbell AC, Gray GR et al (1989) Biliary leakage and peritonitis following removal of T tubes after bile duct exploration. Br J Surg 76:1296–1297CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Galan CP, Alonso AC (1990) Bile leakage after removal of T tubes from the common bile duct. Br J Surg 77:1075CrossRef Galan CP, Alonso AC (1990) Bile leakage after removal of T tubes from the common bile duct. Br J Surg 77:1075CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bark K, Gamblin TC, Zuckerman R et al (2009) Operative choledochoscopic laser lithotripsy for impacted intrahepatic gallstones: a novel surgical approach. Surg Endosc 23:221–224CrossRefPubMed Bark K, Gamblin TC, Zuckerman R et al (2009) Operative choledochoscopic laser lithotripsy for impacted intrahepatic gallstones: a novel surgical approach. Surg Endosc 23:221–224CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Wenner DE, Whitwam P, Rosser J et al (2005) A stone extraction facilitation device to achieve an improved technique for performing LCBDE. Surg Endosc 19:120–125CrossRefPubMed Wenner DE, Whitwam P, Rosser J et al (2005) A stone extraction facilitation device to achieve an improved technique for performing LCBDE. Surg Endosc 19:120–125CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Use of Rigid Nephroscope for Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration—A Single-Center Experience
Authors
Muneer Khan
Syed Javid Farooq Qadri
Syed Sajad Nazir
Publication date
01-04-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 4/2010
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0397-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2010

World Journal of Surgery 4/2010 Go to the issue