Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 5/2014

Open Access 01-05-2014 | Original Article

Use of myocardial perfusion imaging and estimation of associated radiation doses in Germany from 2005 to 2012

Authors: O. Lindner, F. M. Bengel, M. Hacker, W. Schäfer, W. Burchert, Working Group Cardiovascular Nuclear Medicine of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

For several years the Working Group Cardiovascular Nuclear Medicine of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine has been performing a regular survey to obtain information on technique, utilization and development of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS). Currently, data of six surveys from 2005 to 2012 are available. The aim of this paper is to deliver a general and comprehensive overview of all surveys documenting the course of patient doses over time and the development of the method.

Methods

A one-page questionnaire with number of MPS patients, number of stress and rest MPS, referral structure and several technical issues was sent to all centres performing MPS in Germany and evaluated. With the data on protocol utilization, effective MPS patient doses were estimated.

Results

MPS per million population (pmp) varied between 2,380 and 2,770. In 2012, MPS pmp showed a slight increase for the first time. From 2005 to 2009 the angiography to MPS ratio increased from 3.4 to 4.4, and the revascularization to MPS ratio decreased from 0.66 to 0.53. In 2012, both indices demonstrated an opposite trend for the first time (4.1 and 0.55). A total of 108 centres participated in all surveys. They showed an increase in MPS patients of 4.0 % over the reporting period. In 2012, more than 50 % of the centres experienced no change or an increase in MPS numbers. The leading single competitor was MRI, followed by angiography and stress echocardiography. 201Tl studies have decreased since 2005 from 20 to 5 %. 99mTc MPS studies showed a mild increase in 2-day protocols. In 2012, the average effective dose per patient was estimated at 7.4 mSv. Due to the decreasing use of 201Tl, a mild decline over the observation period can be documented. Dynamic exercise stress was the most common stress test and adenosine the leading pharmacological stress agent, with a growing percentage. In 2012, the regadenoson percentage was 9 %. Gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) noted an increasing acceptance with >70 % in 2012. The segmental scoring of perfusion studies had a low acceptance. Ambulatory care cardiologists represented the major referral group.

Conclusion

Germany has a moderate to moderate-high MPS utilization rate. Nevertheless, coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnosis and disease management are dominated by angiography. The survey data reveal a positive trend in MPS and a decrease in average patient dose reflecting good practice with guideline adherence, the implementation of technical improvements and success in training.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Strahlenschutzverordnung (Radiation Protection Ordinance). 15th ed 2009. Carl Heymanns Verlag. ISBN 345227103X. Strahlenschutzverordnung (Radiation Protection Ordinance). 15th ed 2009. Carl Heymanns Verlag. ISBN 345227103X.
2.
go back to reference Lindner O, Burchert W, Bengel FM, Zimmermann R, Vom Dahl J, Schäfer W, et al. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in Germany. Results of the 2005 query and current status. Nuklearmedizin 2007;46:49–55.PubMed Lindner O, Burchert W, Bengel FM, Zimmermann R, Vom Dahl J, Schäfer W, et al. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in Germany. Results of the 2005 query and current status. Nuklearmedizin 2007;46:49–55.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Lindner O, Burchert W, Bengel FM, Zimmermann R, Vom Dahl J, Schäfer W, et al. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy 2006 in Germany. Results of the query and current status. Nuklearmedizin 2008;47:139–45.PubMed Lindner O, Burchert W, Bengel FM, Zimmermann R, Vom Dahl J, Schäfer W, et al. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy 2006 in Germany. Results of the query and current status. Nuklearmedizin 2008;47:139–45.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Lindner O, Burchert W, Bengel F, Zimmermann R, Vom Dahl J, Schäfer W, et al. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy 2007 in Germany—results of the query and current status. Nuklearmedizin 2009;48:131–7.PubMed Lindner O, Burchert W, Bengel F, Zimmermann R, Vom Dahl J, Schäfer W, et al. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy 2007 in Germany—results of the query and current status. Nuklearmedizin 2009;48:131–7.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Lindner O, Burchert W, Bengel FM, Zimmermann R, Vom Dahl J, Schäfer W, et al. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy 2008 in Germany—results of the fourth query. Nuklearmedizin 2010;49:65–72.PubMedCrossRef Lindner O, Burchert W, Bengel FM, Zimmermann R, Vom Dahl J, Schäfer W, et al. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy 2008 in Germany—results of the fourth query. Nuklearmedizin 2010;49:65–72.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lindner O, Burchert W, Bengel FM, Zimmermann R, Vom Dahl J, Schäfer W, et al. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in Germany in 2009: utilization and state of the practice. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011;38:1485–92.PubMedCrossRef Lindner O, Burchert W, Bengel FM, Zimmermann R, Vom Dahl J, Schäfer W, et al. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in Germany in 2009: utilization and state of the practice. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011;38:1485–92.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lindner O, Burchert W, Schäfers M, Schäfer W. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy 2012 in Germany. Results of the 6th query. Nuklearmedizin 2013;53(1). Epub ahead of print. Lindner O, Burchert W, Schäfers M, Schäfer W. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy 2012 in Germany. Results of the 6th query. Nuklearmedizin 2013;53(1). Epub ahead of print.
8.
go back to reference Tilkemeier P, Green J, Einstein AJ, Fazel R, Reames P, Shaw LJ. The evolving practice of nuclear cardiology: results from the 2011 ASNC member survey. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:1170–5.PubMedCrossRef Tilkemeier P, Green J, Einstein AJ, Fazel R, Reames P, Shaw LJ. The evolving practice of nuclear cardiology: results from the 2011 ASNC member survey. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:1170–5.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Einstein AJ, Tilkemeier P, Fazel R, Rakotoarivelo H, Shaw LJ, et al. Radiation safety in nuclear cardiology-current knowledge and practice: results from the 2011 American Society of Nuclear Cardiology member survey. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:1021–3.PubMedCrossRef Einstein AJ, Tilkemeier P, Fazel R, Rakotoarivelo H, Shaw LJ, et al. Radiation safety in nuclear cardiology-current knowledge and practice: results from the 2011 American Society of Nuclear Cardiology member survey. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:1021–3.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mitteilung der KBV (Communication of the NASHIP). KBV Abrechnungsstatistik (Statistics of the NASHIP). 2005–2012. Mitteilung der KBV (Communication of the NASHIP). KBV Abrechnungsstatistik (Statistics of the NASHIP). 2005–2012.
11.
go back to reference Statistisches Bundesamt. Sozialleistungen - Angaben zur Krankenversicherung (Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus) 2007. Fachserie 13 Reihe 1.1. Date of publication 11 Dec 2008. Statistisches Bundesamt. Sozialleistungen - Angaben zur Krankenversicherung (Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus) 2007. Fachserie 13 Reihe 1.1. Date of publication 11 Dec 2008.
12.
go back to reference Statistisches Bundesamt. Sozialleistungen - Angaben zur Krankenversicherung (Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus) 2011. Fachserie 13 Reihe 1.1. Date of publication 25 July 2012. Statistisches Bundesamt. Sozialleistungen - Angaben zur Krankenversicherung (Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus) 2011. Fachserie 13 Reihe 1.1. Date of publication 25 July 2012.
13.
go back to reference Deutsche Herzstiftung e.V. Deutscher Herzbericht 2011; ISBN 978-3-9811926-4-3. 2012. Deutsche Herzstiftung e.V. Deutscher Herzbericht 2011; ISBN 978-3-9811926-4-3. 2012.
14.
go back to reference Directive 97/43/Euratom of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure, and repealing Directive 84/466/Euratom. Official J Eur Commun 1997;L 180:22–27C. Directive 97/43/Euratom of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure, and repealing Directive 84/466/Euratom. Official J Eur Commun 1997;L 180:22–27C.
15.
go back to reference Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (Federal Office for Radiation Protection). Bekanntmachung der Diagnostischen Referenzwerte für radiologische und nuklearmedizinische Untersuchungen. 2003. Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (Federal Office for Radiation Protection). Bekanntmachung der Diagnostischen Referenzwerte für radiologische und nuklearmedizinische Untersuchungen. 2003.
16.
go back to reference ICRP. Publication 80. Radiological protection in biomedical research. Ann ICRP 1998;28: 3. ICRP. Publication 80. Radiological protection in biomedical research. Ann ICRP 1998;28: 3.
17.
go back to reference Reyes E, Wiener S, Underwood SR, European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in Europe 2007: a survey of the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012;39:160–4.PubMedCrossRef Reyes E, Wiener S, Underwood SR, European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in Europe 2007: a survey of the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012;39:160–4.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Vitola JV, Shaw LJ, Allam AH, Orellana P, Peix A, Ellmann A, et al. Assessing the need for nuclear cardiology and other advanced cardiac imaging modalities in the developing world. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16:956–61.PubMedCrossRef Vitola JV, Shaw LJ, Allam AH, Orellana P, Peix A, Ellmann A, et al. Assessing the need for nuclear cardiology and other advanced cardiac imaging modalities in the developing world. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16:956–61.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Berrington de Gonzalez A, Kim KP, Smith-Bindman R, McAreavey D. Myocardial perfusion scans: projected population cancer risks from current levels of use in the United States. Circulation 2010;122:2403–10.PubMedCrossRef Berrington de Gonzalez A, Kim KP, Smith-Bindman R, McAreavey D. Myocardial perfusion scans: projected population cancer risks from current levels of use in the United States. Circulation 2010;122:2403–10.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Achenbach S, Daniel WG. Noninvasive coronary angiography–an acceptable alternative? N Engl J Med 2001;345:1909–10.PubMedCrossRef Achenbach S, Daniel WG. Noninvasive coronary angiography–an acceptable alternative? N Engl J Med 2001;345:1909–10.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan PM, Maron DJ, Kostuk WJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1503–16.PubMedCrossRef Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan PM, Maron DJ, Kostuk WJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1503–16.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Shaw LJ, Hage FG, Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Iskandrian A. Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be? J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:1026–43.PubMedCrossRef Shaw LJ, Hage FG, Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Iskandrian A. Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be? J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:1026–43.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lindner O, Burchert W, Hacker M, Schäfer W, Schmidt M, Schober O, et al. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy - short form of the German guideline. Nuklearmedizin 2013;52:51–63.PubMedCrossRef Lindner O, Burchert W, Hacker M, Schäfer W, Schmidt M, Schober O, et al. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy - short form of the German guideline. Nuklearmedizin 2013;52:51–63.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Marcassa C, Zoccarato O, Calza P, Campini R. Temporal evolution of administered activity in cardiac gated SPECT and patients’ effective dose: analysis of an historical series. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013;40:325–30.PubMedCrossRef Marcassa C, Zoccarato O, Calza P, Campini R. Temporal evolution of administered activity in cardiac gated SPECT and patients’ effective dose: analysis of an historical series. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013;40:325–30.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Holly TA, Abbott BG, Al-Mallah M, Calnon DA, Cohen MC, DiFilippo FP, et al. Single photon-emission computed tomography. J Nucl Cardiol 2010;17:941–73.PubMedCrossRef Holly TA, Abbott BG, Al-Mallah M, Calnon DA, Cohen MC, DiFilippo FP, et al. Single photon-emission computed tomography. J Nucl Cardiol 2010;17:941–73.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Underwood SR, Wiener S. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in Europe 2005: a survey of the European Council on Nuclear Cardiology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36:260–8.PubMedCrossRef Underwood SR, Wiener S. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in Europe 2005: a survey of the European Council on Nuclear Cardiology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36:260–8.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Use of myocardial perfusion imaging and estimation of associated radiation doses in Germany from 2005 to 2012
Authors
O. Lindner
F. M. Bengel
M. Hacker
W. Schäfer
W. Burchert
Working Group Cardiovascular Nuclear Medicine of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-013-2683-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 5/2014 Go to the issue