Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Urothelial Cancer | Research

Construction of a survival prediction model for high-and low -grade UTUC after tumor resection based on “SEER database”: a multicenter study

Authors: Mengmeng Wang, Xin Ren, Ge Wang, Xiaomin Sun, Shifeng Tang, Baogang Zhang, Xiaoming Xing, Wenfeng Zhang, Guojun Gao, Jing Du, Shukun Zhang, Lijuan Liu, Xia Zheng, Zhenkun Zhang, Changgang Sun

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There are differences in survival between high-and low-grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC). Our study aimed to develop a nomogram to predict overall survival (OS) of patients with high- and low-grade UTUC after tumor resection, and to explore the difference between high- and low-grade patients.

Methods

Patients confirmed to have UTUC between 2004 and 2015 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. The UTUCs were identified and classified as high- and low-grade, and 1-, 3- and 5-year nomograms were established. The nomogram was then validated using the Chinese multicenter dataset (patients diagnosed in Shandong, China between January 2010 and October 2020).

Results

In the high-grade UTUC patients, nine important factors related to survival after tumor resection were identified to construct nomogram. The C index of training dataset was 0.740 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.727–0.754), showing good calibration. The C index of internal validation dataset was 0.729(95% CI:0.707–0.750). On the other hand, Two independent predictors were identified to construct nomogram of low-grade UTUC. The C index was 0.714 (95% CI: 0.671–0.758) for the training set,0.731(95% CI:0.670–0.791) for the internal validation dataset. Encouragingly, the nomogram was clinically useful and had a good discriminative ability to identify patients at high risk.

Conclusion

We constructed a nomogram and a corresponding risk classification system predicting the OS of patients with an initial diagnosis of high-and low-grade UTUC.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
6.
go back to reference Ariane MM, Colin P, Ouzzane A, Pignot G, Audouin M, Cornu JN, et al. Assessment of oncologic control obtained after open versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUT-UCs): results from a large French multicenter collaborative study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(1):301–8. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1841-x.CrossRefPubMed Ariane MM, Colin P, Ouzzane A, Pignot G, Audouin M, Cornu JN, et al. Assessment of oncologic control obtained after open versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUT-UCs): results from a large French multicenter collaborative study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(1):301–8. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1245/​s10434-011-1841-x.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Zeng S, Dai L, Yang J, Gao X, Yu X, Ren Q, et al. Development and external validation of a nomogram predicting prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy. Urol Oncol. 2019;37(4):290.e217–24.CrossRef Zeng S, Dai L, Yang J, Gao X, Yu X, Ren Q, et al. Development and external validation of a nomogram predicting prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy. Urol Oncol. 2019;37(4):290.e217–24.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Almås B, Halvorsen OJ, Gjengstø P, Ulvik Ø, Beisland C. Grading of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract according to the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology classification from 2004 is a valuable tool when considering whether a patient is suitable for endoscopic treatment. Scand J Urol. 2016;50(4):298–304. https://doi.org/10.3109/21681805.2016.1144220.CrossRefPubMed Almås B, Halvorsen OJ, Gjengstø P, Ulvik Ø, Beisland C. Grading of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract according to the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology classification from 2004 is a valuable tool when considering whether a patient is suitable for endoscopic treatment. Scand J Urol. 2016;50(4):298–304. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3109/​21681805.​2016.​1144220.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: 2nd Int Symp information theory. Budapest: Akademia Kiado; 1973. Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: 2nd Int Symp information theory. Budapest: Akademia Kiado; 1973.
17.
go back to reference van Rhijn BWG, Hentschel AE, Bründl J, Compérat EM, Hernández V, Čapoun O, et al. Prognostic value of the WHO1973 and WHO2004/2016 classification Systems for Grade in primary ta/T1 non-muscle-invasive bladder Cancer: a multicenter European Association of Urology non-muscle-invasive bladder Cancer guidelines panel study. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4(2):182–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2020.12.002.CrossRefPubMed van Rhijn BWG, Hentschel AE, Bründl J, Compérat EM, Hernández V, Čapoun O, et al. Prognostic value of the WHO1973 and WHO2004/2016 classification Systems for Grade in primary ta/T1 non-muscle-invasive bladder Cancer: a multicenter European Association of Urology non-muscle-invasive bladder Cancer guidelines panel study. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4(2):182–91. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​euo.​2020.​12.​002.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Construction of a survival prediction model for high-and low -grade UTUC after tumor resection based on “SEER database”: a multicenter study
Authors
Mengmeng Wang
Xin Ren
Ge Wang
Xiaomin Sun
Shifeng Tang
Baogang Zhang
Xiaoming Xing
Wenfeng Zhang
Guojun Gao
Jing Du
Shukun Zhang
Lijuan Liu
Xia Zheng
Zhenkun Zhang
Changgang Sun
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08742-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Cancer 1/2021 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine