Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 5/2020

01-05-2020 | Urolithiasis | Urogenital

Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) to differentiate uric acid from non-uric acid calculi: systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Trevor A. McGrath, Robert A. Frank, Nicola Schieda, Brian Blew, Jean-Paul Salameh, Patrick M. M. Bossuyt, Matthew D. F. McInnes

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Uric acid stone diagnosis is presently done primarily with in vitro analysis of stones. In vivo diagnosis with dual-energy CT (DECT) would allow earlier initiation of therapy with urine alkalinization and avoid surgical intervention.

Objective

To evaluate if DECT, using stone analysis as reference standard, is sufficiently accurate to replace stone analysis for diagnosis of uric acid stones.

Methods

Original studies in patients with urolithiasis examined with DECT with stone analysis as the reference standard were eligible for inclusion. MEDLINE (1946–2018), Embase (1947–2018), CENTRAL (August 2018), and multiple urology and radiology conferences were searched. QUADAS-2 was used to assess risk of bias and applicability. Meta-analyses were performed using a bivariate random-effects model.

Results

A total of 21 studies (1105 patients, 1442 stones) were included. Fourteen studies containing 662 patients (944 stones) were analyzed in the uric acid dominant target condition (majority of stone composition uric acid): mean sensitivity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.79–0.93) and specificity 0.98 (95% CI 0.96–0.99). Thirteen studies (674 patients, 760 stones) were analyzed in the uric acid–containing target condition (< majority of stone composition uric acid): mean sensitivity was 0.82 (95% CI 0.73–0.89) and specificity 0.97 (95% CI 0.94–0.98). Meta-regression showed no significant variability in test accuracy. Two studies had one or more domains at high risk of bias and there were no concerns regarding applicability.

Conclusion

DECT is an accurate replacement test for diagnosis of uric acid calculi in vivo, such that stone analysis could be replaced in the diagnostic pathway. This would enable earlier initiation of urine alkalinization.

Key Points

DECT for uric acid dominant stones has sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.79–0.93) and specificity of 0.98 (95% CI 0.96–0.99); uric acid–containing stones had mean sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI 0.73–0.89) and specificity of 0.97 (95% CI 0.94–0.98).
Meta-regression did not identify any variables (study design, reference standard, dual-energy CT type, dose, risk of bias) that influenced test accuracy.
Only 2 of the 21 included studies had 1 or more domain considered to be at high risk of bias with the majority of domains considered at low risk of bias; there were no concerns regarding applicability in any of the included studies.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Saigal CS, Joyce G, Timilsina AR, Urologic Diseases in America Project (2005) Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: opportunity for disease management? Kidney Int 68(4):1808–1814 Saigal CS, Joyce G, Timilsina AR, Urologic Diseases in America Project (2005) Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: opportunity for disease management? Kidney Int 68(4):1808–1814
2.
go back to reference Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS, Urologic Diseases in America Project (2012) Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 62(1):160–165 Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS, Urologic Diseases in America Project (2012) Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 62(1):160–165
3.
go back to reference Smith-Bindman R, Aubin C, Bailitz J et al (2014) Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis. N Engl J Med 371(12):1100–1110PubMedCrossRef Smith-Bindman R, Aubin C, Bailitz J et al (2014) Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis. N Engl J Med 371(12):1100–1110PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bultitude M, Smith D, Thomas K (2016) Contemporary management of stone disease: the new EAU urolithiasis guidelines for 2015. Eur Urol 69(3):483–484PubMedCrossRef Bultitude M, Smith D, Thomas K (2016) Contemporary management of stone disease: the new EAU urolithiasis guidelines for 2015. Eur Urol 69(3):483–484PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dion M, Ankawi G, Chew B et al (2016) CUA guideline on the evaluation and medical management of the kidney stone patient - 2016 update. Can Urol Assoc J 10(11-12):E347–E358PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Dion M, Ankawi G, Chew B et al (2016) CUA guideline on the evaluation and medical management of the kidney stone patient - 2016 update. Can Urol Assoc J 10(11-12):E347–E358PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Thomas C, Heuschmid M, Schilling D et al (2010) Urinary calculi composed of uric acid, cystine, and mineral salts: differentiation with dual-energy CT at a radiation dose comparable to that of intravenous pyelography. Radiology 257(2):402–409PubMedCrossRef Thomas C, Heuschmid M, Schilling D et al (2010) Urinary calculi composed of uric acid, cystine, and mineral salts: differentiation with dual-energy CT at a radiation dose comparable to that of intravenous pyelography. Radiology 257(2):402–409PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, Fletcher JG (2015) Dual- and multi-energy CT: principles, technical approaches, and clinical applications. Radiology 276(3):637–653PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, Fletcher JG (2015) Dual- and multi-energy CT: principles, technical approaches, and clinical applications. Radiology 276(3):637–653PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kaza RK, Ananthakrishnan L, Kambadakone A, Platt JF (2017) Update of dual-energy CT applications in the genitourinary tract. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208(6):1185–1192PubMedCrossRef Kaza RK, Ananthakrishnan L, Kambadakone A, Platt JF (2017) Update of dual-energy CT applications in the genitourinary tract. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208(6):1185–1192PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zheng X, Liu Y, Li M, Wang Q, Song B (2016) Dual-energy computed tomography for characterizing urinary calcified calculi and uric acid calculi: a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 85(10):1843–1848PubMedCrossRef Zheng X, Liu Y, Li M, Wang Q, Song B (2016) Dual-energy computed tomography for characterizing urinary calcified calculi and uric acid calculi: a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 85(10):1843–1848PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Connolly MJ, McInnes MDF, El-Khodary M, McGrath TA, Schieda N (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of virtual non-contrast enhanced dual-energy CT for diagnosis of adrenal adenoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 27(10):4324–4335PubMedCrossRef Connolly MJ, McInnes MDF, El-Khodary M, McGrath TA, Schieda N (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of virtual non-contrast enhanced dual-energy CT for diagnosis of adrenal adenoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 27(10):4324–4335PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Salameh JP, McInnes MDF, McGrath TA, Salameh G, Schieda N (2019) Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT for evaluation of renal masses: systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol:1–6 Salameh JP, McInnes MDF, McGrath TA, Salameh G, Schieda N (2019) Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT for evaluation of renal masses: systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol:1–6
12.
go back to reference Motley G, Dalrymple N, Keesling C, Fischer J, Harmon W (2001) Hounsfield unit density in the determination of urinary stone composition. Urology 58(2):170–173PubMedCrossRef Motley G, Dalrymple N, Keesling C, Fischer J, Harmon W (2001) Hounsfield unit density in the determination of urinary stone composition. Urology 58(2):170–173PubMedCrossRef
13.
14.
go back to reference Deeks J, Bossuyt P, Gatsonis C (2013) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy, 1.0.0 ed. The Cochrane Collaboration Deeks J, Bossuyt P, Gatsonis C (2013) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy, 1.0.0 ed. The Cochrane Collaboration
15.
go back to reference McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD et al (2018) Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement. JAMA 319(4):388–396PubMedCrossRef McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD et al (2018) Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement. JAMA 319(4):388–396PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155(8):529–536PubMedCrossRef Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155(8):529–536PubMedCrossRef
17.
18.
go back to reference McGrath TA, Bossuyt PM, Cronin P et al (2018) Best practices for MRI systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Magn Reson Imaging McGrath TA, Bossuyt PM, Cronin P et al (2018) Best practices for MRI systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Magn Reson Imaging
19.
go back to reference Alsinnawi M, Maan Z, Rix G (2016) Oral dissolution therapy for radiolucent kidney stones. An old treatment revisited. J Clin Urol 4(9):268–273CrossRef Alsinnawi M, Maan Z, Rix G (2016) Oral dissolution therapy for radiolucent kidney stones. An old treatment revisited. J Clin Urol 4(9):268–273CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Marchini GS, Sarkissian C, Tian D, Gebreselassie S, Monga M (2013) Gout, stone composition and urinary stone risk: a matched case comparative study. J Urol 189(4):1334–1339PubMedCrossRef Marchini GS, Sarkissian C, Tian D, Gebreselassie S, Monga M (2013) Gout, stone composition and urinary stone risk: a matched case comparative study. J Urol 189(4):1334–1339PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference McGrath T, McInnes M, Langer F, Hong J, Korevaar D, Bossuyt P (2017) Treatment of multiple test readers in diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews of imaging studies. Eur J Radiol 93:59–64PubMedCrossRef McGrath T, McInnes M, Langer F, Hong J, Korevaar D, Bossuyt P (2017) Treatment of multiple test readers in diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews of imaging studies. Eur J Radiol 93:59–64PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference McGrath TA, McInnes MD, Korevaar DA, Bossuyt PM (2016) Meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy in imaging journals: analysis of pooling techniques and their effect on summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 152229 McGrath TA, McInnes MD, Korevaar DA, Bossuyt PM (2016) Meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy in imaging journals: analysis of pooling techniques and their effect on summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 152229
23.
go back to reference McGrath TA, McInnes MDF, van Es N, Leeflang MMG, Korevaar DA, Bossuyt PMM (2017) Overinterpretation of research findings: evidence of “Spin” in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies. Clin Chem 63:1353–1362 McGrath TA, McInnes MDF, van Es N, Leeflang MMG, Korevaar DA, Bossuyt PMM (2017) Overinterpretation of research findings: evidence of “Spin” in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies. Clin Chem 63:1353–1362
24.
go back to reference Bonatti M, Lombardo F, Zamboni GA et al (2017) Renal stones composition in vivo determination: comparison between 100/Sn140 kV dual-energy CT and 120 kV single-energy CT. Urolithiasis 45(3):255–261PubMedCrossRef Bonatti M, Lombardo F, Zamboni GA et al (2017) Renal stones composition in vivo determination: comparison between 100/Sn140 kV dual-energy CT and 120 kV single-energy CT. Urolithiasis 45(3):255–261PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Graser A, Johnson TR, Bader M et al (2008) Dual energy CT characterization of urinary calculi: initial in vitro and clinical experience. Invest Radiol 43(2):112–119PubMedCrossRef Graser A, Johnson TR, Bader M et al (2008) Dual energy CT characterization of urinary calculi: initial in vitro and clinical experience. Invest Radiol 43(2):112–119PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Henzler T, Fink C, Schoenberg SO, Schoepf UJ (2012) Dual-energy CT: radiation dose aspects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(5 Suppl):S16–S25PubMedCrossRef Henzler T, Fink C, Schoenberg SO, Schoepf UJ (2012) Dual-energy CT: radiation dose aspects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(5 Suppl):S16–S25PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Foley WD, Shuman WP, Siegel MJ et al (2016) White Paper of the Society of Computed Body Tomography and Magnetic Resonance on Dual-Energy CT, Part 2: Radiation dose and iodine sensitivity. J Comput Assist Tomogr 40(6):846–850PubMedCrossRef Foley WD, Shuman WP, Siegel MJ et al (2016) White Paper of the Society of Computed Body Tomography and Magnetic Resonance on Dual-Energy CT, Part 2: Radiation dose and iodine sensitivity. J Comput Assist Tomogr 40(6):846–850PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference De Cecco CN, Boll DT, Bolus DN et al (2017) White Paper of the Society of Computed Body Tomography and Magnetic Resonance on Dual-Energy CT, Part 4: Abdominal and pelvic applications. J Comput Assist Tomogr 41(1):8–14PubMedCrossRef De Cecco CN, Boll DT, Bolus DN et al (2017) White Paper of the Society of Computed Body Tomography and Magnetic Resonance on Dual-Energy CT, Part 4: Abdominal and pelvic applications. J Comput Assist Tomogr 41(1):8–14PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Heye T, Nelson RC, Ho LM, Marin D, Boll DT (2012) Dual-energy CT applications in the abdomen. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(5 Suppl):S64–S70PubMedCrossRef Heye T, Nelson RC, Ho LM, Marin D, Boll DT (2012) Dual-energy CT applications in the abdomen. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(5 Suppl):S64–S70PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kamalian S, Lev MH, Pomerantz SR (2017) Dual-energy computed tomography angiography of the head and neck and related applications. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 27(3):429–443 Kamalian S, Lev MH, Pomerantz SR (2017) Dual-energy computed tomography angiography of the head and neck and related applications. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 27(3):429–443
31.
go back to reference Wortman JR, Uyeda JW, Fulwadhva UP, Sodickson AD (2018) Dual-Energy CT for Abdominal and Pelvic Trauma. Radiographics 38(2):586–602PubMedCrossRef Wortman JR, Uyeda JW, Fulwadhva UP, Sodickson AD (2018) Dual-Energy CT for Abdominal and Pelvic Trauma. Radiographics 38(2):586–602PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) to differentiate uric acid from non-uric acid calculi: systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Trevor A. McGrath
Robert A. Frank
Nicola Schieda
Brian Blew
Jean-Paul Salameh
Patrick M. M. Bossuyt
Matthew D. F. McInnes
Publication date
01-05-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword
Urolithiasis
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06559-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

European Radiology 5/2020 Go to the issue