Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Techniques in Coloproctology
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 8/2014

01-08-2014 | Correspondence

Urogynecological prolapse and enterocele are predictive of poor functional outcome after failed or complicated STARR procedures

Authors: F. Guerra, F. La Torre, M. Pescatori

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 8/2014

Login to get access

Excerpt

Dear Sir, …
Literature
1.
Schwandner O, Fürst A (2010) Assessing the safety, effectiveness, and quality of life after the STARR procedure for obstructed defecation: results of the German STARR registry. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:505–513PubMedCrossRef
2.
Pescatori M, Aigner F (2007) Stapled transanal rectal mucosectomy ten years after. Tech Coloproctol 11:1–6PubMedCrossRef
3.
Pescatori M, Gagliardi G (2008) Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures. Tech Coloproctol 12:7–19PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
Corman ML, Carriero A, Hager T et al (2006) Consensus conference on the stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for disordered defaecation. Colorectal Dis 8:98–101PubMedCrossRef
5.
Gagliardi G, Pescatori M, Altomare D et al (2008) Results, outcome predictors, and complications after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 51:186–195 (discussion 195)PubMedCrossRef
6.
Pescatori M, Seow-Choen F (2003) Use and abuse of new technologies in colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 7:1–2PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Urogynecological prolapse and enterocele are predictive of poor functional outcome after failed or complicated STARR procedures
Authors
F. Guerra
F. La Torre
M. Pescatori
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 8/2014
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1140-1

Other articles of this Issue 8/2014

Techniques in Coloproctology 8/2014 Go to the issue

Original Article

The tissue selecting technique (TST) versus the Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsing hemorrhoids: a retrospective case–control study

Review

Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) to treat anal fistula: systematic review and meta-analysis

Original Article

Predicting complete response to neoadjuvant CRT for distal rectal cancer using sequential PET/CT imaging

Original Article

Botulinum toxin injection versus lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials

Trick of the Trade

A technique of continent perineal colostomy after laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection

Original Article

Is “really conscious” sedation with solely an opioid an alternative to every day used sedation regimes for colonoscopies in a teaching hospital? Midazolam/fentanyl, propofol/alfentanil, or alfentanil only for colonoscopy: a randomized trial