Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 6/2007

01-06-2007 | Current Opinion/Update

Urogynaecological research: current and future developments

Author: Gunnar Lose

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 6/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

The massive introduction of new products from device and drug industries together with a scanty device approval process and a growing scepticism about the reliability of drug trials call for new improved strategies in urogynaecological research. Device companies and physicians have a mutual ethical responsibility of contributing to create clinical data based on the framework of trials in surgery before new surgical products are implemented and disseminated. In respect of the patients’ altruism and confidence, which make drug trials possible, the industry and academia have an obligation to conduct and report clinical results in accordance with the highest standards of scientific and ethical integrity.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (2005) Research methodology, vol 1, Chapter 3. 3rd International Consultation on Incontinence. Health Publication Ltd, Plymouth (Incontinence) Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (2005) Research methodology, vol 1, Chapter 3. 3rd International Consultation on Incontinence. Health Publication Ltd, Plymouth (Incontinence)
2.
go back to reference Walters MD (2003) The use and misuse of prosthetic materials in reconstructive pelvic surgery: does the evidence support our surgical practice? Int Urogynecol J 14:365–366CrossRef Walters MD (2003) The use and misuse of prosthetic materials in reconstructive pelvic surgery: does the evidence support our surgical practice? Int Urogynecol J 14:365–366CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Petri E, Kölbl H (2004) Eminence, or rather eloquence, or rather economy-based medicine? Int Urogynecol J 15:147–148CrossRef Petri E, Kölbl H (2004) Eminence, or rather eloquence, or rather economy-based medicine? Int Urogynecol J 15:147–148CrossRef
4.
go back to reference McCulloch P, Taylor I, Sasako M, Lovett B, Griffin D (2002) Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solution. BMJ 324:1448–1451PubMedCrossRef McCulloch P, Taylor I, Sasako M, Lovett B, Griffin D (2002) Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solution. BMJ 324:1448–1451PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Black N (1996) Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. BMJ 312:1215–1218PubMed Black N (1996) Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. BMJ 312:1215–1218PubMed
6.
go back to reference Lose G, Ostergard DR (1999) Medical technology assessment and surgery for stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 10:351–352CrossRef Lose G, Ostergard DR (1999) Medical technology assessment and surgery for stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 10:351–352CrossRef
8.
go back to reference De Angelis C, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA et al (2004) Clinical trial registration: a statement from the international committee of medical journal editors. N Engl J Med 351:1250–1251PubMedCrossRef De Angelis C, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA et al (2004) Clinical trial registration: a statement from the international committee of medical journal editors. N Engl J Med 351:1250–1251PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Moynihan R (2003) Who pays for the pizza? Redefining the relationships between doctors and drug companies. 1: Entanglement. BMJ 326:1189–1192PubMedCrossRef Moynihan R (2003) Who pays for the pizza? Redefining the relationships between doctors and drug companies. 1: Entanglement. BMJ 326:1189–1192PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Korn D, Ehringhaus S (2006) Principles for strengthening the integrity of clinical research. PLOS Clin Trials 1(1):e1, May 2006PubMedCrossRef Korn D, Ehringhaus S (2006) Principles for strengthening the integrity of clinical research. PLOS Clin Trials 1(1):e1, May 2006PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O (2003) Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ 326:1167–1170PubMedCrossRef Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O (2003) Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ 326:1167–1170PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gøtzsche PC (2005) Uafhængig klinisk interventionsforskning er meget påkrævet. Ugeskr Læger 167:1491–1494PubMed Gøtzsche PC (2005) Uafhængig klinisk interventionsforskning er meget påkrævet. Ugeskr Læger 167:1491–1494PubMed
13.
go back to reference Herbison P, Hay-Smith J, Ellis K, Moor K (2003) Effectiveness of anticholinergic drugs compared with placebo in the treatment of overactive bladder: systematic review. BMJ 326:841–844PubMedCrossRef Herbison P, Hay-Smith J, Ellis K, Moor K (2003) Effectiveness of anticholinergic drugs compared with placebo in the treatment of overactive bladder: systematic review. BMJ 326:841–844PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koplan S, Swift S, Versi E (2004) Efficacy of antimuscarinic therapy for overactive bladder with varying degrees of incontinence severity. J Urol 171:752–756PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koplan S, Swift S, Versi E (2004) Efficacy of antimuscarinic therapy for overactive bladder with varying degrees of incontinence severity. J Urol 171:752–756PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hilton P (2007) Of porcupines and poodles—a joint challenge to industry and the profession. Int Urogynecol J 18(1):3–11CrossRef Hilton P (2007) Of porcupines and poodles—a joint challenge to industry and the profession. Int Urogynecol J 18(1):3–11CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Fontanarosa PB, Flanagin A, DeAngelis CD (2005) Reporting conflicts of interest, financial aspects of research, and role of sponsors in funded studies. JAMA 294:110–111PubMedCrossRef Fontanarosa PB, Flanagin A, DeAngelis CD (2005) Reporting conflicts of interest, financial aspects of research, and role of sponsors in funded studies. JAMA 294:110–111PubMedCrossRef
19.
Metadata
Title
Urogynaecological research: current and future developments
Author
Gunnar Lose
Publication date
01-06-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 6/2007
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0318-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2007

International Urogynecology Journal 6/2007 Go to the issue