Skip to main content
Top
Published in: African Journal of Urology 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Ureterorenoscopy | Original Research

Patients’ life quality during ureterorenoscopy, ureterorenoscopy plus JJ insertion and shock wave lithotripsy in the management of distal ureteral stone: a prospective clinical study

Author: Cem Kezer

Published in: African Journal of Urology | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To clarify the effects of ureterorenoscopy (URS) and shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) on patients’ life quality in the management of distal ureteral stone (DUS) with using Short Form 36 (SF 36).

Methods

The present study was conducted in a prospective manner between July 2018 and July 2021. Patients who had DUS stone smaller than 1.5 cm were accepted as candidates for the study. Preoperative patient characteristics and treatment outcomes were recorded. Also, the SF-36 form was completed one day before the procedure and one month after the procedure. Patients were divided into three groups according to treatment modality as SWL, only URS, and URS including JJ stent insertion.

Results

Totally, 44 patients were treated with SWL, 27 patients were treated with URS, and 31 patients were treated with URS including JJ insertion. Hospitalisation period was significantly shorter in the SWL group (p = 0.001). Additionally, patients treated with SWL had a significantly lower analgesia requirement rate (31.8% in SWL group, 77.8% in URS group and 64.5% in URS + JJ stent group, p = 0.001). Stone-free status and complications did not significantly differ between groups (p = 0.846 and p = 0.096). Physical functioning score and role physical domains were significantly increased in patients treated with SWL (p = 0.005 and p = 0.031). Similarly, highest improvement for the body pain domain was achieved in the SWL group (p = 0.006).

Conclusion

The present study showed that URS, URS with JJ insertion and SWL are safe and reliable procedures for the management of DUS. However, hospitalisation time was significantly shorter and analgesia requirements were significantly lower in favour of SWL. Additionally, SWL was related with better SF-36 domains including physical functioning, role physical and body pain.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pearce E, Clement KD, Yallappa S, Aboumarzouk OM (2021) Likelihood of distal ureteric calculi to pass spontaneously: systematic review and cumulative analysis of the placebo arm of randomized-controlled trials. Urol Int 105:71–76CrossRef Pearce E, Clement KD, Yallappa S, Aboumarzouk OM (2021) Likelihood of distal ureteric calculi to pass spontaneously: systematic review and cumulative analysis of the placebo arm of randomized-controlled trials. Urol Int 105:71–76CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Arrabal-Polo MA, Arrabal-Martín M, Miján-Ortiz JL, Valle-Díaz F, López-León V, Merino-Salas S, Zuluaga-Gómez A (2009) Treatment of ureteric lithiasis with retrograde ureteroscopy and holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy vs extracorporeal lithotripsy. BJU Int 104(8):1144–1147CrossRef Arrabal-Polo MA, Arrabal-Martín M, Miján-Ortiz JL, Valle-Díaz F, López-León V, Merino-Salas S, Zuluaga-Gómez A (2009) Treatment of ureteric lithiasis with retrograde ureteroscopy and holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy vs extracorporeal lithotripsy. BJU Int 104(8):1144–1147CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, et al. 2007 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc; European Association of Urology. 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol. 52(6):1610–31. Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, et al. 2007 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc; European Association of Urology. 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol. 52(6):1610–31.
4.
go back to reference Verze P, Imbimbo C, Cancelmo G, Creta M, Palmieri A, Mangiapia F, Buonopane R, Mirone V (2010) Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs ureteroscopy as first-line therapy for patients with single, distal ureteric stones: a prospective randomized study. BJU Int 106:1748–1752CrossRef Verze P, Imbimbo C, Cancelmo G, Creta M, Palmieri A, Mangiapia F, Buonopane R, Mirone V (2010) Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs ureteroscopy as first-line therapy for patients with single, distal ureteric stones: a prospective randomized study. BJU Int 106:1748–1752CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Zeng GQ, Zhong WD, Cai YB, Dai QS, Hu JB, Wei HA (2002) Extracorporeal shock-wave versus pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy in treatment of lower ureteral calculi. Asian J Androl 4:303–305PubMed Zeng GQ, Zhong WD, Cai YB, Dai QS, Hu JB, Wei HA (2002) Extracorporeal shock-wave versus pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy in treatment of lower ureteral calculi. Asian J Androl 4:303–305PubMed
6.
go back to reference Somuncu E, Kara Y (2021) The effect of parathyroidectomy on quality of life in primary hyperparathyroidism: evaluation with using sf-36 and phpqol questionnaire. Endocr J 68:87–93CrossRef Somuncu E, Kara Y (2021) The effect of parathyroidectomy on quality of life in primary hyperparathyroidism: evaluation with using sf-36 and phpqol questionnaire. Endocr J 68:87–93CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pardalidis NP, Kosmaoglou EV, Kapotis CG (1999) Endoscopy vs. extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of distal ureteral stones: ten years’ experience. J Endourol 13:161–164CrossRef Pardalidis NP, Kosmaoglou EV, Kapotis CG (1999) Endoscopy vs. extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of distal ureteral stones: ten years’ experience. J Endourol 13:161–164CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Honeck P, Häcker A, Alken P, Michel MS, Knoll T (2006) Shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: a prospective study. Urol Res 34:190–192CrossRef Honeck P, Häcker A, Alken P, Michel MS, Knoll T (2006) Shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: a prospective study. Urol Res 34:190–192CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Drake T, Grivas N, Dabestani S, Knoll T, Lam T, Maclennan S, Petrik A, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Tuerk C, Yuan CY, Sarica K (2017) What are the benefits and harms of ureteroscopy compared with shock-wave lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral stones? A System Rev Eur Urol 72:772–786CrossRef Drake T, Grivas N, Dabestani S, Knoll T, Lam T, Maclennan S, Petrik A, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Tuerk C, Yuan CY, Sarica K (2017) What are the benefits and harms of ureteroscopy compared with shock-wave lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral stones? A System Rev Eur Urol 72:772–786CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sarica K, Eryildirim B, Sahin C et al (2016) Emergency management of ureteral stones: evaluation of two different approaches with an emphasis on patients’ life quality. Arch Ital Urol Androl 88:201–205CrossRef Sarica K, Eryildirim B, Sahin C et al (2016) Emergency management of ureteral stones: evaluation of two different approaches with an emphasis on patients’ life quality. Arch Ital Urol Androl 88:201–205CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hamamoto S, Unno R, Taguchi K et al (2018) Determinants of health-related quality of life for patients after urinary lithotripsy: ureteroscopic vs. shock wave lithotripsy. Urolithiasis. 46:203–210CrossRef Hamamoto S, Unno R, Taguchi K et al (2018) Determinants of health-related quality of life for patients after urinary lithotripsy: ureteroscopic vs. shock wave lithotripsy. Urolithiasis. 46:203–210CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nestler S, Witte B, Schilchegger L, Jones J (2020) Size does matter: ureteral stents with a smaller diameter show advantages regarding urinary symptoms, pain levels and general health. World J Urol 38:1059–1063CrossRef Nestler S, Witte B, Schilchegger L, Jones J (2020) Size does matter: ureteral stents with a smaller diameter show advantages regarding urinary symptoms, pain levels and general health. World J Urol 38:1059–1063CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Patients’ life quality during ureterorenoscopy, ureterorenoscopy plus JJ insertion and shock wave lithotripsy in the management of distal ureteral stone: a prospective clinical study
Author
Cem Kezer
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
African Journal of Urology / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1110-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1961-9987
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-022-00276-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

African Journal of Urology 1/2022 Go to the issue