Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 11/2019

01-11-2019 | Ureterectomy | Topic Paper

Robotic radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional experience

Authors: Riccardo Campi, Juliette Cotte, Francesco Sessa, Thomas Seisen, Riccardo Tellini, Daniele Amparore, Nicola Mormile, Aurélien Gobert, Andrea Mari, Francesco Porpiglia, Sergio Serni, Andrea Minervini, Morgan Rouprêt

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 11/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To report a multi-institutional experience on robotic radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and segmental ureterectomy (SU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

Methods

Data were prospectively collected from patients with non-metastatic UTUC undergoing robotic SU or RNU at three referral centers between 2015 and 2018. Transperitoneal, single-docking robotic RNU followed established principles. Bladder cuff excision (BCE) was performed with robotic or open approach. Techniques for SU included: ureteral resection and primary uretero-ureterostomy; partial pyelectomy and modified pyeloplasty; ureteral resection with BCE and direct- or psoas hitch-ureteroneocystostomy. We retrospectively evaluated the technical feasibility, and peri-operative and oncologic outcomes after robotic RNU/SU.

Results

81 patients were included. No case required conversion to open surgery. Early major (Clavien–Dindo grade > 2) complications were reported in six (7.4%) patients (two after SU, four after RNU). Three patients experienced late major complications (one after SU, two after RNU). Median ΔeGFR at 3 months was − 1 ml/min/1.73 m2 after SU and − 15 ml/min/1.73 m2 after RNU. Positive surgical margins were recorded in five patients (one after SU, four after RNU). Median follow-up was 21 months and 22 months in the SU and RNU groups, respectively. Three (20%) patients had ipsilateral upper tract recurrence after SU, while five (7.5%) developed metastases after RNU. No case of port-site metastases or peritoneal carcinomatosis was reported. At last follow-up, 67 (82.7%) patients were alive without evidence of disease.

Conclusion

Robotic SU and RNU are technically feasible and achieved promising peri-operative and oncologic outcomes in selected patients with non-metastatic UTUC.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Seisen T, Peyronnet B, Dominguez-Escrig JL et al (2016) Oncologic outcomes of kidney-sparing surgery versus radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review by the EAU non-muscle invasive bladder cancer guidelines panel. Eur Urol 70(6):1052–1068CrossRef Seisen T, Peyronnet B, Dominguez-Escrig JL et al (2016) Oncologic outcomes of kidney-sparing surgery versus radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review by the EAU non-muscle invasive bladder cancer guidelines panel. Eur Urol 70(6):1052–1068CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fang D, Seisen T, Yang K et al (2016) A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and renal function outcomes obtained after segmental ureterectomy versus radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 42(11):1625–1635CrossRef Fang D, Seisen T, Yang K et al (2016) A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and renal function outcomes obtained after segmental ureterectomy versus radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 42(11):1625–1635CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mullen E, Ahmed K, Challacombe B (2017) Systematic review of open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted nephroureterectomy. Rev Urol 19(1):32–43PubMedPubMedCentral Mullen E, Ahmed K, Challacombe B (2017) Systematic review of open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted nephroureterectomy. Rev Urol 19(1):32–43PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Rouprêt M, Harmon JD, Sanderson KM et al (2007) Laparoscopic distal ureterectomy and anastomosis for management of low-risk upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma: preliminary results. BJU Int 99(3):623–627CrossRef Rouprêt M, Harmon JD, Sanderson KM et al (2007) Laparoscopic distal ureterectomy and anastomosis for management of low-risk upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma: preliminary results. BJU Int 99(3):623–627CrossRef
6.
go back to reference McClain PD, Mufarrij PW, Hemal AK (2012) Robot-assisted reconstructive surgery for ureteral malignancy: analysis of efficacy and oncologic outcomes. J Endourol 26(12):1614–1617CrossRef McClain PD, Mufarrij PW, Hemal AK (2012) Robot-assisted reconstructive surgery for ureteral malignancy: analysis of efficacy and oncologic outcomes. J Endourol 26(12):1614–1617CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Krane LS, Hemal AK (2012) Surgeon-controlled robotic ureteral surgery. Curr Opin Urol 22(1):70–77CrossRef Krane LS, Hemal AK (2012) Surgeon-controlled robotic ureteral surgery. Curr Opin Urol 22(1):70–77CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hemal A, Stansel I, Babber P, Patel M (2011) Robotic-assisted nephroureterectomy and bladder cuff excision without intraoperative repositioning. Urology 78:357–364CrossRef Hemal A, Stansel I, Babber P, Patel M (2011) Robotic-assisted nephroureterectomy and bladder cuff excision without intraoperative repositioning. Urology 78:357–364CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zargar H, Krishnan J, Autorino R et al (2014) Robotic nephroureterectomy: a simplified approach requiring no patient repositioning or robot redocking. Eur Urol 66:769–777CrossRef Zargar H, Krishnan J, Autorino R et al (2014) Robotic nephroureterectomy: a simplified approach requiring no patient repositioning or robot redocking. Eur Urol 66:769–777CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pathak RA, Hemal AK (2018) Techniques and outcomes of robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol Focus 4(5):657–661CrossRef Pathak RA, Hemal AK (2018) Techniques and outcomes of robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol Focus 4(5):657–661CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gakis G, Schubert T, Alemozaffar M et al (2017) Update of the ICUD-SIU consultation on upper tract urothelial carcinoma 2016: treatment of localized high-risk disease. World J Urol 35(3):327–335CrossRef Gakis G, Schubert T, Alemozaffar M et al (2017) Update of the ICUD-SIU consultation on upper tract urothelial carcinoma 2016: treatment of localized high-risk disease. World J Urol 35(3):327–335CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Peyronnet B, Seisen T, Dominguez-Escrig JL et al (2017) Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy versus open radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an European Association of Urology guidelines systematic review. Eur Urol Focus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2017.10.003 (Epub ahead of print) CrossRef Peyronnet B, Seisen T, Dominguez-Escrig JL et al (2017) Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy versus open radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an European Association of Urology guidelines systematic review. Eur Urol Focus. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​euf.​2017.​10.​003 (Epub ahead of print) CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tinay I, Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F, Leow JJ et al (2016) Trends in utilisation, perioperative outcomes, and costs of nephroureterectomies in the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a 10-year population-based analysis. BJU Int 117:954–960CrossRef Tinay I, Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F, Leow JJ et al (2016) Trends in utilisation, perioperative outcomes, and costs of nephroureterectomies in the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a 10-year population-based analysis. BJU Int 117:954–960CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rodriguez JF, Packiam VT, Boysen WR et al (2017) Utilization and outcomes of nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma by surgical approach. J Endourol 31(7):661–665CrossRef Rodriguez JF, Packiam VT, Boysen WR et al (2017) Utilization and outcomes of nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma by surgical approach. J Endourol 31(7):661–665CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mitropoulos D, Artibani W, Graefen M et al (2012) Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. Eur Urol 61:341–349CrossRef Mitropoulos D, Artibani W, Graefen M et al (2012) Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. Eur Urol 61:341–349CrossRef
17.
go back to reference von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453–1457CrossRef von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453–1457CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Pugh J, Parekattil S, Willis D et al (2013) Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional series. BJU Int 112(4):E295–E300CrossRef Pugh J, Parekattil S, Willis D et al (2013) Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional series. BJU Int 112(4):E295–E300CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Campi R, Minervini A, Mari A et al (2017) Anatomical templates of lymph node dissection for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review of the literature. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 17(3):235–246CrossRef Campi R, Minervini A, Mari A et al (2017) Anatomical templates of lymph node dissection for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review of the literature. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 17(3):235–246CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Mari A, Sforza S, Morselli S et al (2018) Surgical outcome of 100 consecutive robot-assisted pyeloplasty cases with no drainage placement for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Int J Urol 25(7):700–701CrossRef Mari A, Sforza S, Morselli S et al (2018) Surgical outcome of 100 consecutive robot-assisted pyeloplasty cases with no drainage placement for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Int J Urol 25(7):700–701CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Musch M, Hohenhorst L, Pailliart A et al (2013) Robot-assisted reconstructive surgery of the distal ureter: single institution experience in 16 patients. BJU Int 111(5):773–783CrossRef Musch M, Hohenhorst L, Pailliart A et al (2013) Robot-assisted reconstructive surgery of the distal ureter: single institution experience in 16 patients. BJU Int 111(5):773–783CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nakada SY, Hsu THS (2012) Management of upper urinary tract obstruction. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA (eds) Campbell-Walsh urology, vol 2, 10th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1122–1168CrossRef Nakada SY, Hsu THS (2012) Management of upper urinary tract obstruction. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA (eds) Campbell-Walsh urology, vol 2, 10th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1122–1168CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Glinianski M, Guru KA, Zimmerman G et al (2009) Robot-assisted ureterectomy and ureteral reconstruction for urothelial carcinoma. J Endourol 23(1):97–100CrossRef Glinianski M, Guru KA, Zimmerman G et al (2009) Robot-assisted ureterectomy and ureteral reconstruction for urothelial carcinoma. J Endourol 23(1):97–100CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Aboumohamed AA, Krane LS, Hemal AK (2015) Oncologic outcomes following robot-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. J Urol 194(6):1561–1566CrossRef Aboumohamed AA, Krane LS, Hemal AK (2015) Oncologic outcomes following robot-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. J Urol 194(6):1561–1566CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lim SK, Shin TY, Kim KH et al (2013) Intermediate-term outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 11(4):515–521CrossRef Lim SK, Shin TY, Kim KH et al (2013) Intermediate-term outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 11(4):515–521CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Trudeau V, Gandaglia G, Shiffmann J et al (2014) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper-tract urothelial cancer: a population-based assessment of costs and perioperative outcomes. Can Urol Assoc J 8(9–10):E695–E701CrossRef Trudeau V, Gandaglia G, Shiffmann J et al (2014) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper-tract urothelial cancer: a population-based assessment of costs and perioperative outcomes. Can Urol Assoc J 8(9–10):E695–E701CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Xylinas E, Rink M, Cha EK et al (2014) Impact of distal ureter management on oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol 65:210–217CrossRef Xylinas E, Rink M, Cha EK et al (2014) Impact of distal ureter management on oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol 65:210–217CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lenis A, Donin N, Faiena I et al (2018) Role of surgical approach on lymph node dissection yield and survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 36:e1–e9CrossRef Lenis A, Donin N, Faiena I et al (2018) Role of surgical approach on lymph node dissection yield and survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 36:e1–e9CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kamat AM, Sylvester RJ, Böhle A et al (2016) Definitions, end points, and clinical trial designs for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: recommendations from the International Bladder Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 34:1935–1944CrossRef Kamat AM, Sylvester RJ, Böhle A et al (2016) Definitions, end points, and clinical trial designs for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: recommendations from the International Bladder Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 34:1935–1944CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Robotic radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional experience
Authors
Riccardo Campi
Juliette Cotte
Francesco Sessa
Thomas Seisen
Riccardo Tellini
Daniele Amparore
Nicola Mormile
Aurélien Gobert
Andrea Mari
Francesco Porpiglia
Sergio Serni
Andrea Minervini
Morgan Rouprêt
Publication date
01-11-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 11/2019
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02790-y

Other articles of this Issue 11/2019

World Journal of Urology 11/2019 Go to the issue