Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica 10/2016

01-10-2016 | Clinical Article - Neurosurgical Techniques

Unilateral endonasal transcribriform approach with septal transposition for olfactory groove meningioma: can olfaction be preserved?

Authors: A. Samy Youssef, Raghuram Sampath, Jacob L. Freeman, Jameson K. Mattingly, Vijay R. Ramakrishnan

Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Issue 10/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Loss of olfaction has been considered inevitable in endoscopic endonasal resection of olfactory groove meningiomas. Olfaction preservation may be feasible through an endonasal unilateral transcribriform approach, with the option for expansion using septal transposition and contralateral preservation of the olfactory apparatus.

Methods

An expanded unilateral endonasal transcribriform approach with septal transposition was performed in five cadaver heads. The approach was applied in a surgical case of a 24 × 26-mm olfactory groove meningioma originating from the right cribriform plate with partially intact olfaction.

Results

The surgical approach offered adequate exposure to the anterior skull base bilaterally. The nasal/septal mucosa was preserved on the contralateral side. Gross total resection of the meningioma was achieved with the successful preservation of the contralateral olfactory apparatus and preoperative olfaction. Six months later, the left nasal cavity showed no disruption of the mucosal lining and the right side was at the appropriate stage of healing for a harvested nasoseptal flap. One year later, the preoperative olfactory function was intact and favorably viewed by the patient. Objective testing of olfaction showed microsomia.

Conclusions

Olfaction preservation may be feasible in the endoscopic endonasal resection of a unilateral olfactory groove meningioma through a unilateral transcribriform approach with septal transposition and preservation of the contralateral olfactory apparatus.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Banu MA, Mehta A, Ottenhausen M, Fraser JF, Patel KS, Szentirmai O, Anand VK, Tsiouris AJ, Schwartz TH (2015) Endoscope-assisted endonasal versus supraorbital keyhole resection of olfactory groove meningiomas: comparison and combination of 2 minimally invasive approaches. J Neurosurg 14:1–16 Banu MA, Mehta A, Ottenhausen M, Fraser JF, Patel KS, Szentirmai O, Anand VK, Tsiouris AJ, Schwartz TH (2015) Endoscope-assisted endonasal versus supraorbital keyhole resection of olfactory groove meningiomas: comparison and combination of 2 minimally invasive approaches. J Neurosurg 14:1–16
2.
go back to reference Brand G, Jacquot L (2001) Quality of odor and olfactory lateralization processes in humans. Neurosci Lett 316(2):91–94CrossRefPubMed Brand G, Jacquot L (2001) Quality of odor and olfactory lateralization processes in humans. Neurosci Lett 316(2):91–94CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference De Almeida JR, Carvalho F, Vaz Guimaraes Filho F, Kiehl TR, Koutourousiou M, Su S, Vescan AD, Witterick IJ, Zadeh G, Wang EW, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA, Gentili F, Snyderman CH (2015) Comparison of endoscopic endonasal and bifrontal craniotomy approaches for olfactory groove meningiomas: a matched pair analysis of outcomes and frontal lobe changes on MRI. J Clin Neurosci 22(11):1733–1741CrossRefPubMed De Almeida JR, Carvalho F, Vaz Guimaraes Filho F, Kiehl TR, Koutourousiou M, Su S, Vescan AD, Witterick IJ, Zadeh G, Wang EW, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA, Gentili F, Snyderman CH (2015) Comparison of endoscopic endonasal and bifrontal craniotomy approaches for olfactory groove meningiomas: a matched pair analysis of outcomes and frontal lobe changes on MRI. J Clin Neurosci 22(11):1733–1741CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Doty RL, Shaman P, Kimmelman CP, Dann MS (1984) University of Pennsylvania smell identification test: a rapid quantitative olfactory function test for the clinic. Laryngoscope 94(2 pt 1):176–178CrossRefPubMed Doty RL, Shaman P, Kimmelman CP, Dann MS (1984) University of Pennsylvania smell identification test: a rapid quantitative olfactory function test for the clinic. Laryngoscope 94(2 pt 1):176–178CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Fulbright RK, Skudlarski P, Lacadie CM, Warrenburg S, Bowers AA, Gore JC, Wexler BE (1998) Functional MR imaging of regional brain responses to pleasant and unpleasant odors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19(9):1721–1726PubMed Fulbright RK, Skudlarski P, Lacadie CM, Warrenburg S, Bowers AA, Gore JC, Wexler BE (1998) Functional MR imaging of regional brain responses to pleasant and unpleasant odors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19(9):1721–1726PubMed
6.
go back to reference Herz RS, McCall C, Cahill L (1999) Hemispheric lateralization in the processing of odor pleasantness versus odor names. Chem Senses 24(6):691–695CrossRefPubMed Herz RS, McCall C, Cahill L (1999) Hemispheric lateralization in the processing of odor pleasantness versus odor names. Chem Senses 24(6):691–695CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Jang WY, Jung S, Jung TY, Moon KS, Kim IY (2013) Preservation of olfaction in surgery of olfactory groove meningiomas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115(8):1288–1292CrossRefPubMed Jang WY, Jung S, Jung TY, Moon KS, Kim IY (2013) Preservation of olfaction in surgery of olfactory groove meningiomas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115(8):1288–1292CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kettenmann B, Hummel C, Stefan H, Kobal G (1996) Multichannel magnetoencephalographical recordings: separation of cortical responses to different chemical stimulation in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 46:271–274PubMed Kettenmann B, Hummel C, Stefan H, Kobal G (1996) Multichannel magnetoencephalographical recordings: separation of cortical responses to different chemical stimulation in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 46:271–274PubMed
9.
go back to reference Kobal G, Hummel T, Van Toller S (1992) Differences in human chemosensory evoked potentials to olfactory and somatosensory chemical stimuli presented to the left and right nostrils. Chem Senses 17:233–244CrossRef Kobal G, Hummel T, Van Toller S (1992) Differences in human chemosensory evoked potentials to olfactory and somatosensory chemical stimuli presented to the left and right nostrils. Chem Senses 17:233–244CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Koutourousiou M, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Wang EW, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA (2014) Endoscopic endonasal surgery for olfactory groove meningiomas: outcomes and limitations in 50 patients. Neurosurg Focus 37(4):E8CrossRefPubMed Koutourousiou M, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Wang EW, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA (2014) Endoscopic endonasal surgery for olfactory groove meningiomas: outcomes and limitations in 50 patients. Neurosurg Focus 37(4):E8CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Liu JK, Hattar E, Eloy JA (2015) Endoscopic endonasal approach for olfactory groove meningiomas: operative technique and nuances. Neurosurg Clin N Am 26(3):377–388CrossRefPubMed Liu JK, Hattar E, Eloy JA (2015) Endoscopic endonasal approach for olfactory groove meningiomas: operative technique and nuances. Neurosurg Clin N Am 26(3):377–388CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ramakrishnan VR, Suh JD, Chiu AG, Palmer JN (2011) Septal dislocation for endoscopic access of the anterolateral maxillary sinus and infratemporal fossa. Am J Rhinol Allergy 25(2):128–130CrossRefPubMed Ramakrishnan VR, Suh JD, Chiu AG, Palmer JN (2011) Septal dislocation for endoscopic access of the anterolateral maxillary sinus and infratemporal fossa. Am J Rhinol Allergy 25(2):128–130CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Rosen MR, Rabinowitz MR, Farrell CJ, Schaberg MR, Evans JJ (2014) Septal transposition: a novel technique for preservation of the nasal septum during endoscopic endonasal resection of olfactory groove meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus 37(4):E6CrossRefPubMed Rosen MR, Rabinowitz MR, Farrell CJ, Schaberg MR, Evans JJ (2014) Septal transposition: a novel technique for preservation of the nasal septum during endoscopic endonasal resection of olfactory groove meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus 37(4):E6CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Schroeder HW (2015) Indications and limitations of the endoscopic endonasal approach for anterior cranial base meningiomas. World Neurosurg 82(6 Suppl):S81–S85 Schroeder HW (2015) Indications and limitations of the endoscopic endonasal approach for anterior cranial base meningiomas. World Neurosurg 82(6 Suppl):S81–S85
15.
go back to reference Schwartz TH (2014) Should endoscopic endonasal surgery be used in the treatment of olfactory groove meningiomas? Neurosurg Focus 37(4):E9CrossRefPubMed Schwartz TH (2014) Should endoscopic endonasal surgery be used in the treatment of olfactory groove meningiomas? Neurosurg Focus 37(4):E9CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sobel N, Prabhakaran V, Desmond JE, Glover GH, Goode RL, Sullivan EV, Gabrieli JD (1998) Sniffing and smelling: separate subsystems in human olfactory cortex. Nature 392:282–286CrossRefPubMed Sobel N, Prabhakaran V, Desmond JE, Glover GH, Goode RL, Sullivan EV, Gabrieli JD (1998) Sniffing and smelling: separate subsystems in human olfactory cortex. Nature 392:282–286CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Youssem DM, Williams SCR, Howard RO, Andrew C, Simmons A, Allin M, Geckle RJ, Suskind D, Bullmore ET, Brammer MJ, Doty RL (1997) Functional MR imaging during odor stimulation: preliminary data. Radiology 204:833–838CrossRef Youssem DM, Williams SCR, Howard RO, Andrew C, Simmons A, Allin M, Geckle RJ, Suskind D, Bullmore ET, Brammer MJ, Doty RL (1997) Functional MR imaging during odor stimulation: preliminary data. Radiology 204:833–838CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zatorre R, Jones-Gotman M, Evans A, Meyer E (1992) Functional localization of human olfactory cortex with positron emission tomography. Soc Neurosci Abstr 18:933 Zatorre R, Jones-Gotman M, Evans A, Meyer E (1992) Functional localization of human olfactory cortex with positron emission tomography. Soc Neurosci Abstr 18:933
19.
go back to reference Zuco GM, Tressoldi PE (1988) Hemispheric differences in odour recognition. Cortex 25:607–615CrossRef Zuco GM, Tressoldi PE (1988) Hemispheric differences in odour recognition. Cortex 25:607–615CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Unilateral endonasal transcribriform approach with septal transposition for olfactory groove meningioma: can olfaction be preserved?
Authors
A. Samy Youssef
Raghuram Sampath
Jacob L. Freeman
Jameson K. Mattingly
Vijay R. Ramakrishnan
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Electronic ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2922-1

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

Acta Neurochirurgica 10/2016 Go to the issue

Editorial (by Invitation)

Are happy residents better residents?

Letter to the editor - Editorial

Expanding on the term “balloon” sign