Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Surgery International 1/2024

01-12-2024 | Undescended Testis | Review

Comparison of scrotal and inguinal orchiopexy for palpable undescended testis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Authors: Irfan Wahyudi, Putu Angga Risky Raharja, Gerhard Reinaldi Situmorang, Arry Rodjani

Published in: Pediatric Surgery International | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Scrotal and inguinal orchiopexy are two commonly used surgical approaches for palpable undescended testis (UDT), each with distinct advantages. However, the optimal approach remains a matter of debate, warranting a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to guide clinical decision-making.

Materials and methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, to select RCTs comparing scrotal and inguinal orchiopexy for palpable UDT. Eight RCTs were selected for meta-analysis. Outcome measures included operative time, hospitalization duration, total complications, wound infection or dehiscence, testicular atrophy or hypotrophy, and testicular re-ascent rate. The evaluation of the study’s quality was conducted by utilizing the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.

Results

Scrotal orchiopexy showed significantly shorter operative time compared to the inguinal approach (WMD: − 15.06 min; 95% CI: − 21.04 to − 9.08). However, there was no significant difference in hospitalization duration (WMD: − 0.72 days; 95% CI: − 1.89–0.45), total complications (OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.70–1.66), wound infection or dehiscence (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.27–1.99), testicular atrophy or hypotrophy (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.38–2.78), and testicular re-ascent (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 0.67–3.06) between the two approaches. A small proportion of cases (7.3%) required conversion from scrotal to inguinal orchiopexy due to specific anatomical challenges.

Conclusion

Both scrotal and inguinal orchiopexy are safe and effective for palpable UDT, with comparable outcomes in terms of hospitalization and complications. Scrotal orchiopexy offers the advantage of shorter operative time. Clinicians can use this evidence to make informed decisions on the surgical approach for palpable UDT.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Caruso AP, Walsh RA, Wolach JW, Koyle MA (2000) Single scrotal incision orchiopexy for the palpable undescended testicle. J Urol 164(1):156–159CrossRefPubMed Caruso AP, Walsh RA, Wolach JW, Koyle MA (2000) Single scrotal incision orchiopexy for the palpable undescended testicle. J Urol 164(1):156–159CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kollin C, Ritzén EM (2014) Cryptorchidism: a clinical perspective. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev 11(Suppl 2):240–250PubMed Kollin C, Ritzén EM (2014) Cryptorchidism: a clinical perspective. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev 11(Suppl 2):240–250PubMed
10.
go back to reference Bhutta MR, Sheikh AH, Qureshi MA, Zubair MA, Majid F (2012) Single incision trans scrotal versus standard inguino-scrotal orchidopexy in children with palpable undescended testis: our experience from april 2007 to april 2010. Pakistan J Med Sci 28(5):827–829 Bhutta MR, Sheikh AH, Qureshi MA, Zubair MA, Majid F (2012) Single incision trans scrotal versus standard inguino-scrotal orchidopexy in children with palpable undescended testis: our experience from april 2007 to april 2010. Pakistan J Med Sci 28(5):827–829
18.
go back to reference Ali MS, Khan N, Uddin MB, Hossain MS, Mushtabshirah L (2019) High transverse scrotal incision orchiopexy for undescended testes. Mymensingh Med J 28(3):542–546PubMed Ali MS, Khan N, Uddin MB, Hossain MS, Mushtabshirah L (2019) High transverse scrotal incision orchiopexy for undescended testes. Mymensingh Med J 28(3):542–546PubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of scrotal and inguinal orchiopexy for palpable undescended testis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Authors
Irfan Wahyudi
Putu Angga Risky Raharja
Gerhard Reinaldi Situmorang
Arry Rodjani
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0179-0358
Electronic ISSN: 1437-9813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05655-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Pediatric Surgery International 1/2024 Go to the issue