Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2014

01-04-2014 | Dynamic Manuscript

Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal neoplasia is easily learned, efficacious, and safe

Authors: Andrew Y. Wang, Mary M. Flynn, James T. Patrie, Dawn G. Cox, Wissam Bleibel, James A. Mann, Bryan G. Sauer, Vanessa M. Shami

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) without submucosal injection is a novel endoscopic procedure. It is not known if UEMR can be easily taught and learned, and the efficacy and safety of UEMR has not been demonstrated at multiple medical centers. Our aims were to demonstrate that (1) UEMR is a technique that can be easily learned by an endoscopist trained in traditional EMR, (2) endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) may not be required before UEMR, and (3) UEMR is an efficacious and safe method for resection of large or flat neoplastic colorectal lesions.

Methods

An experienced interventional endoscopist began performing UEMR after observing UEMR procedures. Colorectal UEMR was performed using a pediatric colonoscope with a cap, a waterjet, and a ‘duck-bill’ snare using blended current. Submucosal injection was not used. Patient data were collected prospectively.

Results

A total of 21 patients (17 men, mean age 64.9 years, range 51–83) referred for polypectomy of large colorectal lesions underwent UEMR. A total of 43 colorectal lesions with a mean size of 20 mm (range 8–50) were resected by UEMR. Lesions were found in the right colon (N = 16), transverse colon (N = 5), left colon (N = 19), and rectum (N = 3). Pathology demonstrated tubular adenoma (N = 29), tubulovillous adenoma (N = 5), high-grade dysplasia (N = 3), serrated sessile adenoma without dysplasia (N = 3), and non-neoplastic tissue (N = 3). EUS was used in only two cases of rectal neoplasia (4.7 %). Of the UEMRs, 97.7 % were successful with complete resection of colorectal polyps. The only adverse event was one case (2.3 %) of delayed post-UEMR bleeding.

Conclusions

UEMR was easily learned by an endoscopist already skilled in conventional EMR. EUS may not be required prior to most UEMR procedures. UEMR appears to be an efficacious and safe alternative to traditional EMR or ESD for large or flat colorectal neoplasms.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wang AY, Ahmad NA, Zaidman JS, Brensinger CM, Lewis JD, Long WB, Kochman ML, Ginsberg GG (2008) Endoluminal resection for sessile neoplasia in the GI tract is associated with a low recurrence rate and a high 5 years survival rate. Gastrointest Endosc 68:160–169PubMedCrossRef Wang AY, Ahmad NA, Zaidman JS, Brensinger CM, Lewis JD, Long WB, Kochman ML, Ginsberg GG (2008) Endoluminal resection for sessile neoplasia in the GI tract is associated with a low recurrence rate and a high 5 years survival rate. Gastrointest Endosc 68:160–169PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wang AY, Emura F, Oda I, Cox DG, Kim HS, Yeaton P (2010) Endoscopic submucosal dissection with electrosurgical knives in a patient on aspirin therapy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 72:1066–1071PubMedCrossRef Wang AY, Emura F, Oda I, Cox DG, Kim HS, Yeaton P (2010) Endoscopic submucosal dissection with electrosurgical knives in a patient on aspirin therapy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 72:1066–1071PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Teoh AY, Chiu PW, Wong SK, Sung JJ, Lau JY, Ng EK (2010) Difficulties and outcomes in starting endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc 24:1049–1054PubMedCrossRef Teoh AY, Chiu PW, Wong SK, Sung JJ, Lau JY, Ng EK (2010) Difficulties and outcomes in starting endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc 24:1049–1054PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Binmoeller KF, Weilert F, Shah J, Bhat Y, Kane S (2012) ‘Underwater’ EMR without submucosal injection for large sessile colorectal polyps (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 75:1086–1091PubMedCrossRef Binmoeller KF, Weilert F, Shah J, Bhat Y, Kane S (2012) ‘Underwater’ EMR without submucosal injection for large sessile colorectal polyps (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 75:1086–1091PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Leung FW, Amato A, Ell C, Friedland S, Harker JO, Hsieh YH, Leung JW, Mann SK, Paggi S, Pohl J, Radaelli F, Ramirez FC, Siao-Salera R, Terruzzi V (2012) Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 76:657–666PubMedCrossRef Leung FW, Amato A, Ell C, Friedland S, Harker JO, Hsieh YH, Leung JW, Mann SK, Paggi S, Pohl J, Radaelli F, Ramirez FC, Siao-Salera R, Terruzzi V (2012) Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 76:657–666PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Henry ZH, Yeaton P, Shami VM, Kahaleh M, Patrie JT, Cox DG, Peura DA, Emura F, Wang AY (2010) Meshed capillary vessels found on narrow-band imaging without optical magnification effectively identifies colorectal neoplasia: a North American validation of the Japanese experience. Gastrointest Endosc 72:118–126PubMedCrossRef Henry ZH, Yeaton P, Shami VM, Kahaleh M, Patrie JT, Cox DG, Peura DA, Emura F, Wang AY (2010) Meshed capillary vessels found on narrow-band imaging without optical magnification effectively identifies colorectal neoplasia: a North American validation of the Japanese experience. Gastrointest Endosc 72:118–126PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hardin JW, Hilbe J (2003) Generalized estimating equations. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL Hardin JW, Hilbe J (2003) Generalized estimating equations. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL
8.
go back to reference No authors listed (2003) The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 58(6):S3–43 No authors listed (2003) The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 58(6):S3–43
9.
go back to reference Waxman I (2006) EUS and EMR/ESD: is EUS in patients with Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal adenocarcinoma necessary prior to endoscopic mucosal resection? Endoscopy 38(1):S2–S4PubMedCrossRef Waxman I (2006) EUS and EMR/ESD: is EUS in patients with Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal adenocarcinoma necessary prior to endoscopic mucosal resection? Endoscopy 38(1):S2–S4PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Choi J, Kim SG, Im JP, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS (2010) Is endoscopic ultrasonography indispensable in patients with early gastric cancer prior to endoscopic resection? Surg Endosc 24:3177–3185PubMedCrossRef Choi J, Kim SG, Im JP, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS (2010) Is endoscopic ultrasonography indispensable in patients with early gastric cancer prior to endoscopic resection? Surg Endosc 24:3177–3185PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ahmad NA, Kochman ML, Long WB, Furth EE, Ginsberg GG (2002) Efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection: a study of 101 cases. Gastrointest Endosc 55:390–396PubMedCrossRef Ahmad NA, Kochman ML, Long WB, Furth EE, Ginsberg GG (2002) Efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection: a study of 101 cases. Gastrointest Endosc 55:390–396PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tajika M, Niwa Y, Bhatia V, Kondo S, Tanaka T, Mizuno N, Hara K, Hijioka S, Imaoka H, Ogura T, Haba S, Yamao K (2011) Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal tumors. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23:1042–1049PubMed Tajika M, Niwa Y, Bhatia V, Kondo S, Tanaka T, Mizuno N, Hara K, Hijioka S, Imaoka H, Ogura T, Haba S, Yamao K (2011) Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal tumors. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23:1042–1049PubMed
13.
go back to reference Sakamoto T, Matsuda T, Otake Y, Nakajima T, Saito Y (2012) Predictive factors of local recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol 47:635–640PubMedCrossRef Sakamoto T, Matsuda T, Otake Y, Nakajima T, Saito Y (2012) Predictive factors of local recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol 47:635–640PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal neoplasia is easily learned, efficacious, and safe
Authors
Andrew Y. Wang
Mary M. Flynn
James T. Patrie
Dawn G. Cox
Wissam Bleibel
James A. Mann
Bryan G. Sauer
Vanessa M. Shami
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3297-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2014 Go to the issue