Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Commentary

Undertaking a randomised controlled trial in the police setting: methodological and practical challenges

Authors: Arabella Scantlebury, Catriona McDaid, Alison Booth, Caroline Fairhurst, Adwoa Parker, Rebecca Payne, Helen Reed, William J. Scott, David Torgerson, Catherine Hewitt

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There has been an increased drive towards Evidence Based Policing in recent years. Unlike in other public sector services, such as health and education, randomised controlled trials in the police setting are relatively rare. This paper discusses some of the methodological and practical challenges of conducting a randomised controlled trial in the police setting in the UK, based on our experience of the Connect trial. This pragmatic, cluster-randomised controlled trial investigated the effectiveness of a face-to-face training intervention for frontline officers in comparison to routine training. The primary outcome was the number of incidents which resulted in a police response reported to North Yorkshire Police control room in a 1-month period up to 6 months after delivery of training.

Main text

The methodological and practical challenges that we experienced whilst conducting the Connect trial are discussed under six headings: establishing the unit of randomisation; population of interest and sample size; co-production of evidence; time frame; outcomes; and organisational issues.

Conclusion

Recommendations on the conduct of future randomised controlled trials in the police setting are made. To understand the context in which research is undertaken, collaboration between police and academia is needed and police officers should be embedded within trial management groups. Engagement with police data analysts to understand what data is available and facilitate obtaining trial data is also recommended. Police forces may wish to review their IT systems and recording practices. Pragmatic trials are encouraged and time frames need to allow for trial set-up and obtaining relevant ethical approvals.

Trial registration

ISRCTN Registry, ID: ISRCTN11685602. Retrospectively registered on 13 May 2016.
Literature
10.
go back to reference Compton MT, et al. A comprehensive review of extant research on crisis intervention team (CIT) programs. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2008;36(1):47.PubMed Compton MT, et al. A comprehensive review of extant research on crisis intervention team (CIT) programs. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2008;36(1):47.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Booth A, Scantlebury A, Hughes-Morley A, Mitchell N, Wright K, Scott W, McDaid C. Mental health training programmes for non-mental health trained professionals coming into contact with people with mental ill health: a systematic review of effectiveness. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):196. Booth A, Scantlebury A, Hughes-Morley A, Mitchell N, Wright K, Scott W, McDaid C. Mental health training programmes for non-mental health trained professionals coming into contact with people with mental ill health: a systematic review of effectiveness. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):196.
13.
go back to reference Iacobucci G. Police cannot continue to plug gaps in mental health provision, chief inspector warns. BMJ. 2017;357:j1999.CrossRefPubMed Iacobucci G. Police cannot continue to plug gaps in mental health provision, chief inspector warns. BMJ. 2017;357:j1999.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Scantlebury A, et al. Effectiveness of a training program for police officers who come into contact with people with mental health problems: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0184377.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Scantlebury A, et al. Effectiveness of a training program for police officers who come into contact with people with mental health problems: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0184377.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Hayes RJ, Moulton LH. Cluster randomised trials. CRC press; 2017. Hayes RJ, Moulton LH. Cluster randomised trials. CRC press; 2017.
17.
go back to reference Noordzij M, et al. Sample size calculations: basic principles and common pitfalls. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(10):3461–2.CrossRef Noordzij M, et al. Sample size calculations: basic principles and common pitfalls. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(10):3461–2.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gasson S, et al. The value of the Patient and Public Involvement in trial design and development. Clin Oncol. 2015;27:747–9.CrossRef Gasson S, et al. The value of the Patient and Public Involvement in trial design and development. Clin Oncol. 2015;27:747–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Undertaking a randomised controlled trial in the police setting: methodological and practical challenges
Authors
Arabella Scantlebury
Catriona McDaid
Alison Booth
Caroline Fairhurst
Adwoa Parker
Rebecca Payne
Helen Reed
William J. Scott
David Torgerson
Catherine Hewitt
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2369-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Trials 1/2017 Go to the issue