Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Medical Systems 5/2012

01-10-2012 | ORIGINAL PAPER

Understanding the Need of Health Care Providers for Teleconsultation and Technological Attributes in Relation to The Acceptance of Teleconsultation in Malaysia: A Mixed Methods Study

Authors: Nurazean Maarop, Khin Than Win

Published in: Journal of Medical Systems | Issue 5/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the importance of service need along with perceived technology attributes in potentially influence the acceptance of teleconsultation. The study was conducted based on the concurrent triangulation design involving qualitative and quantitative study methods. These entailed interviews with key informants and questionnaires survey of health care providers who practiced in the participating hospitals in Malaysia. Thematic analysis involving iterative coding was conducted on qualitative data. Scale reliability test and hypothesis testing procedures were performed on quantitative data. Subsequently, both data were merged, compared and interpreted. In particular, this study utilized a qualitative priority such that a superior emphasis was placed on the qualitative method to demonstrate an overall understanding. Based on the responses of 20 key informants, there was a significant need for teleconsultation as a tool to extend health services to patients under constrained resources and critical conditions. Apparently, the latest attributes of teleconsultation technology have generally met users’ expectation but rather perceived as supportive facets in encouraging the usage. Concurrently, based on the survey engaging 72 health care providers, teleconsultation acceptance was statistically proven to be strongly associated with service need and not originated exclusively from the technological attributes. Additionally, the results of this study can be used to promote teleconsultation as an effective means in delivering better health services. Thus, the categories emerged from this study may be further revised and examined for explaining the acceptance of teleconsultation technology in other relevant contexts.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Maarop, N., and Win, K. T. A review of telemedicine in developing countries: Introduction and implementation issues. Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Asia Pacific Association of Medical Informatics, November 21–24, Hiroshima, Japan, pp. 85–92, 2009. Maarop, N., and Win, K. T. A review of telemedicine in developing countries: Introduction and implementation issues. Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Asia Pacific Association of Medical Informatics, November 21–24, Hiroshima, Japan, pp. 85–92, 2009.
2.
go back to reference Paul, D. L., Pearlson, K. E., and McDaniel, R. R., Jr., Assessing technological barriers to telemedicine: Technology-management implications. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 46(3):279–88, 1999.CrossRef Paul, D. L., Pearlson, K. E., and McDaniel, R. R., Jr., Assessing technological barriers to telemedicine: Technology-management implications. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 46(3):279–88, 1999.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mohan, J., and Raja-Yaacob, R. R., The Malaysian Telehealth Flagship Application: A national approach to health data protection and utilisation and consumer rights. Int. J. Med. Inform. 73(3):217–227, 2004.CrossRef Mohan, J., and Raja-Yaacob, R. R., The Malaysian Telehealth Flagship Application: A national approach to health data protection and utilisation and consumer rights. Int. J. Med. Inform. 73(3):217–227, 2004.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ministry of Health, Annual Report 2007. Ministry of Health Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2008. Ministry of Health, Annual Report 2007. Ministry of Health Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2008.
5.
go back to reference Rigby, M., Impact of telemedicine must be defined in developing countries. BMJ 324:47–8, 2002.CrossRef Rigby, M., Impact of telemedicine must be defined in developing countries. BMJ 324:47–8, 2002.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hjelm, N. M., Benefits and drawbacks of telemedicine. J. Telemed. Telecare. 11(2):60–70, 2005.CrossRef Hjelm, N. M., Benefits and drawbacks of telemedicine. J. Telemed. Telecare. 11(2):60–70, 2005.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Harno, K. S. R., Telemedicine in managing demand for secondary-care services. J. Telemed. Telecare. 5(3):189–192, 1999.CrossRef Harno, K. S. R., Telemedicine in managing demand for secondary-care services. J. Telemed. Telecare. 5(3):189–192, 1999.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Aas, I. H. M., A qualitative study of the organizational consequences of telemedicine. J. Telemed. Telecare. 7(1):18–26, 2001.CrossRef Aas, I. H. M., A qualitative study of the organizational consequences of telemedicine. J. Telemed. Telecare. 7(1):18–26, 2001.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Roine, R., Ohinmaa, A., and Hailey, D., Assessing telemedicine: A systematic review of the literature. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 165(6):765–771, 2001. Roine, R., Ohinmaa, A., and Hailey, D., Assessing telemedicine: A systematic review of the literature. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 165(6):765–771, 2001.
10.
go back to reference Wootton, R., and Herbert, M., What constitutes success in telehealth. J. Telemed. Telecare. 7(2):3–7, 2001.CrossRef Wootton, R., and Herbert, M., What constitutes success in telehealth. J. Telemed. Telecare. 7(2):3–7, 2001.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Davis, F., Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3):319–340, 1989.CrossRef Davis, F., Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3):319–340, 1989.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Holden, R. J., and Karsh, B.-T., The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. J. Biomed. Inform. 43(1):159–172, 2010.CrossRef Holden, R. J., and Karsh, B.-T., The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. J. Biomed. Inform. 43(1):159–172, 2010.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hu, P. J. H., Chau, P. Y. K., Sheng, O. R. L., and Tam, K. Y., Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 16(2):91–112, 1999. Hu, P. J. H., Chau, P. Y. K., Sheng, O. R. L., and Tam, K. Y., Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 16(2):91–112, 1999.
14.
go back to reference Hu, P. J.-H., Chau, P. Y. K., and Sheng, O. R. L., Adoption of telemedicine technology by health care organizations: An exploratory study. J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer. 12(3):197–221, 2002.CrossRef Hu, P. J.-H., Chau, P. Y. K., and Sheng, O. R. L., Adoption of telemedicine technology by health care organizations: An exploratory study. J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer. 12(3):197–221, 2002.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chau, P. Y. K., and Hu, P. J., Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: An exploratory study. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 18(4):191–229, 2002. Chau, P. Y. K., and Hu, P. J., Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: An exploratory study. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 18(4):191–229, 2002.
16.
go back to reference Rogers, E. M., Diffusion of innovation, 4th edition. Free, New York, 1995. Rogers, E. M., Diffusion of innovation, 4th edition. Free, New York, 1995.
17.
go back to reference Al-Qirim, N., Championing telemedicine adoption and utilization in healthcare organizations in New Zealand. Int. J. Med. Inform. 76(1):42–54, 2007.CrossRef Al-Qirim, N., Championing telemedicine adoption and utilization in healthcare organizations in New Zealand. Int. J. Med. Inform. 76(1):42–54, 2007.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Yi, M. Y., Jackson, J. D., Park, J. S., and Probst, J. C., Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view. Inf. Manag. 43(3):350–363, 2006.CrossRef Yi, M. Y., Jackson, J. D., Park, J. S., and Probst, J. C., Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view. Inf. Manag. 43(3):350–363, 2006.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kraemer, K. L., and King, J. L., Social analysis in MIS: The Irvine School, 1970–1990. In: Nunamaker, J. F. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Volume 3. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alimitos, CA, 1990. Kraemer, K. L., and King, J. L., Social analysis in MIS: The Irvine School, 1970–1990. In: Nunamaker, J. F. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Volume 3. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alimitos, CA, 1990.
20.
go back to reference Teddlie, C., and Tashakkori, A., Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In: Tashakkori, A., and Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of Mixed Method in Social and Behavioural Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 3–50, 2003. Teddlie, C., and Tashakkori, A., Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In: Tashakkori, A., and Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of Mixed Method in Social and Behavioural Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 3–50, 2003.
21.
go back to reference Creswell, J. W., and Plano Clark, V. L., Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2007. Creswell, J. W., and Plano Clark, V. L., Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2007.
22.
go back to reference Teddlie, C., and Tashakkori, A., Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2009. Teddlie, C., and Tashakkori, A., Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2009.
23.
go back to reference Ministry of Health, Annual Report 2009. Ministry of Health Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2009. Ministry of Health, Annual Report 2009. Ministry of Health Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2009.
24.
go back to reference Gilchrist, V. J., and Williams, R. L., Key informant interviews. In: Crabtree, B. F., and Miller, W. L. (Eds.), Doing Qualitative Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 195–218, 1999. Gilchrist, V. J., and Williams, R. L., Key informant interviews. In: Crabtree, B. F., and Miller, W. L. (Eds.), Doing Qualitative Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 195–218, 1999.
25.
go back to reference Cavana, R. Y., Delahaye, B. L., and Sekaran, U., Applied business research: Qualitative and quantitative methods. Wiley, Milton, Queensland, 2001. Cavana, R. Y., Delahaye, B. L., and Sekaran, U., Applied business research: Qualitative and quantitative methods. Wiley, Milton, Queensland, 2001.
26.
go back to reference Merriam, S. B., Basic Interpretive Qualitative Research. In: Merriam, S. B. (Ed.), Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 37–39, 2002. Merriam, S. B., Basic Interpretive Qualitative Research. In: Merriam, S. B. (Ed.), Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 37–39, 2002.
27.
go back to reference Morse, J. M., Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nurs. Res. 40(2):120–123, 1999. Morse, J. M., Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nurs. Res. 40(2):120–123, 1999.
28.
go back to reference Cronbach, L., Essentials of psychological testing. Harper & Row, New York, 1970. Cronbach, L., Essentials of psychological testing. Harper & Row, New York, 1970.
29.
go back to reference Nunnally, J. C., Psychometric theory, 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978. Nunnally, J. C., Psychometric theory, 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.
30.
go back to reference Money, W., and Turner, A. Application of the technology acceptance model to a knowledge management system. In: Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Money, W., and Turner, A. Application of the technology acceptance model to a knowledge management system. In: Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004.
31.
go back to reference Sun, H., and Zhang, P., The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 64(2):53–78, 2006.CrossRef Sun, H., and Zhang, P., The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 64(2):53–78, 2006.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I., Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I., Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975.
33.
go back to reference Allen, P., and Bennett, K., SPSS for the health and behavioural sciences. Thomson, South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 2008. Allen, P., and Bennett, K., SPSS for the health and behavioural sciences. Thomson, South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 2008.
34.
go back to reference Cohen, J., Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1988.MATH Cohen, J., Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1988.MATH
35.
go back to reference Hailey, D., and Crowe, B., A profile of success and failure in telehealth—evidence and opinion from the Successes and Failures in Telehealth conferences. J. Telemed. Telecare. 9(2):22–24, 2003.CrossRef Hailey, D., and Crowe, B., A profile of success and failure in telehealth—evidence and opinion from the Successes and Failures in Telehealth conferences. J. Telemed. Telecare. 9(2):22–24, 2003.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Understanding the Need of Health Care Providers for Teleconsultation and Technological Attributes in Relation to The Acceptance of Teleconsultation in Malaysia: A Mixed Methods Study
Authors
Nurazean Maarop
Khin Than Win
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems / Issue 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0148-5598
Electronic ISSN: 1573-689X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-011-9766-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2012

Journal of Medical Systems 5/2012 Go to the issue