Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Understanding the effectiveness and mechanisms of a social prescribing service: a mixed method analysis

Authors: James Woodall, Joanne Trigwell, Ann-Marie Bunyan, Gary Raine, Victoria Eaton, Joanne Davis, Lucy Hancock, Mary Cunningham, Sue Wilkinson

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Evidence of the effectiveness of social prescribing is inconclusive causing commissioning challenges. This research focusses on a social prescribing scheme in Northern England which deploys ‘Wellbeing Coordinators’ who offer support to individuals, providing advice on local groups and services in their community. The research sought to understand the outcomes of the service and, in addition, the processes which supported delivery.

Methods

Quantitative data was gathered from service users at the point they entered the service and also at the point they exited. Qualitative interviews were also undertaken with service users to gather further understanding of the service and any positive or negative outcomes achieved. In addition, a focus group discussion was also conducted with members of social prescribing staff to ascertain their perspectives of the service both from an operational and strategic perspective.

Results

In total, 342 participants provided complete wellbeing data at baseline and post stage and 26 semi-structured qualitative interviews were carried out. Improvements in participants’ well-being, and perceived levels of health and social connectedness as well as reductions in anxiety was demonstrated. In many cases, the social prescribing service had enabled individuals to have a more positive and optimistic view of their life often through offering opportunities to engage in a range of hobbies and activities in the local community. The data on reductions in future access to primary care was inconclusive. Some evidence was found to show that men may have greater benefit from social prescribing than women. Some of the processes which increased the likelihood of success on the social prescribing scheme included the sustained and flexible relationship between the service user and the Wellbeing Coordinator and a strong and vibrant voluntary and community sector.

Conclusions

Social prescribing has the potential to address the health and social needs of individuals and communities. This research has shown a range of positive outcomes as a result of service users engaging with the service. Social prescribing should be conceptualised as one way to support primary care and tackle unmet needs.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pescheny JV, Pappas Y, Randhawa G. Facilitators and barriers of implementing and delivering social prescribing services: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pescheny JV, Pappas Y, Randhawa G. Facilitators and barriers of implementing and delivering social prescribing services: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference South J, Higgins TJ, Woodall J, White SM. Can social prescribing provide the missing link? Primary Health Care Res Dev. 2008;9(4):310–8.CrossRef South J, Higgins TJ, Woodall J, White SM. Can social prescribing provide the missing link? Primary Health Care Res Dev. 2008;9(4):310–8.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bickerdike L, Booth A, Wilson PM, Farley K, Wright K. Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence. BMJ Open. 2017;7(4):e013384. Bickerdike L, Booth A, Wilson PM, Farley K, Wright K. Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence. BMJ Open. 2017;7(4):e013384.
4.
go back to reference Kilgarriff-Foster A, O'Cathain A. Exploring the components and impact of social prescribing. J Pub Ment Health. 2015;14(3):127–34.CrossRef Kilgarriff-Foster A, O'Cathain A. Exploring the components and impact of social prescribing. J Pub Ment Health. 2015;14(3):127–34.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Moffatt S, Steer M, Lawson S, Penn L, O’Brien N. Link worker social prescribing to improve health and well-being for people with long-term conditions: qualitative study of service user perceptions. BMJ Open. 2017;7(7):e015203.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moffatt S, Steer M, Lawson S, Penn L, O’Brien N. Link worker social prescribing to improve health and well-being for people with long-term conditions: qualitative study of service user perceptions. BMJ Open. 2017;7(7):e015203.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Bertotti M, Frostick C, Hutt P, Sohanpal R, Carnes D. A realist evaluation of social prescribing: an exploration into the context and mechanisms underpinning a pathway linking primary care with the voluntary sector. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017;19(3):232–45. Bertotti M, Frostick C, Hutt P, Sohanpal R, Carnes D. A realist evaluation of social prescribing: an exploration into the context and mechanisms underpinning a pathway linking primary care with the voluntary sector. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017;19(3):232–45.
7.
go back to reference Southby K, Gamsu M. Factors affecting general practice collaboration with voluntary and community sector organisations. Health Soc Care Community. 2018;26(3):e360–e369. Southby K, Gamsu M. Factors affecting general practice collaboration with voluntary and community sector organisations. Health Soc Care Community. 2018;26(3):e360–e369.
8.
go back to reference NHS England. Five year forward view. London: National Health Service; 2014. NHS England. Five year forward view. London: National Health Service; 2014.
9.
go back to reference National Health Service. General practice forward view. London; 2016. National Health Service. General practice forward view. London; 2016.
10.
go back to reference Thomson L, Camic PM, Chatterjee H. Social prescribing: a review of community referral schemes. London: University College London; 2015. Thomson L, Camic PM, Chatterjee H. Social prescribing: a review of community referral schemes. London: University College London; 2015.
11.
go back to reference Carnes D, Sohanpal R, Frostick C, Hull S, Mathur R, Netuveli G, Tong J, Hutt P, Bertotti M. The impact of a social prescribing service on patients in primary care: a mixed methods evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):835.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carnes D, Sohanpal R, Frostick C, Hull S, Mathur R, Netuveli G, Tong J, Hutt P, Bertotti M. The impact of a social prescribing service on patients in primary care: a mixed methods evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):835.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Rempel ES, Wilson EN, Durrant H, Barnett J. Preparing the prescription: a review of the aim and measurement of social referral programmes. BMJ Open. 2017;7(10):e017734.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rempel ES, Wilson EN, Durrant H, Barnett J. Preparing the prescription: a review of the aim and measurement of social referral programmes. BMJ Open. 2017;7(10):e017734.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Kimberlee R, Ward R, Jones M, Powell J. Proving our value: measuring the economic impact of wellspring healthy living Centre’s social prescribing wellbeing programme for low level mental health issues encountered by GP services. Bristol: University of the West of England; 2014. Kimberlee R, Ward R, Jones M, Powell J. Proving our value: measuring the economic impact of wellspring healthy living Centre’s social prescribing wellbeing programme for low level mental health issues encountered by GP services. Bristol: University of the West of England; 2014.
14.
go back to reference Grant C, Goodenough T, Harvey I, Hine C. A randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a referrals facilitator between primary care and the voluntary sector. BMJ. 2000;320(7232):419–23. Grant C, Goodenough T, Harvey I, Hine C. A randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a referrals facilitator between primary care and the voluntary sector. BMJ. 2000;320(7232):419–23.
15.
go back to reference Woodall J, Warwick-Booth L, South J, Cross R. What makes health promotion distinct? Scand J Public Health. 2018;46(Suppl 20):118–22.CrossRefPubMed Woodall J, Warwick-Booth L, South J, Cross R. What makes health promotion distinct? Scand J Public Health. 2018;46(Suppl 20):118–22.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Loftus A, McCauley F, McCarron M. Impact of social prescribing on general practice workload and polypharmacy. Public Health. 2017;148:96–101.CrossRefPubMed Loftus A, McCauley F, McCarron M. Impact of social prescribing on general practice workload and polypharmacy. Public Health. 2017;148:96–101.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Brandling J, House W: Investigation into the feasibility of a social prescribing service in primary care: a pilot project. 2007. Brandling J, House W: Investigation into the feasibility of a social prescribing service in primary care: a pilot project. 2007.
18.
go back to reference Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2002. Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2002.
19.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wilcock A. Occupation, health promotion, and the environment. In: Letts L, Rigby P, Stewart D, editors. Using environments to enable occupational performance. New Jersey: Slack Incorporated; 2003. p. 55–70. Wilcock A. Occupation, health promotion, and the environment. In: Letts L, Rigby P, Stewart D, editors. Using environments to enable occupational performance. New Jersey: Slack Incorporated; 2003. p. 55–70.
21.
go back to reference Johnson S. NHS Leeds west clinical commissioning group patient empowerment project (PEP). In: Final Year One Report. Bradford: NHS Yorkshire and Humber Commissioning Support; 2015. Johnson S. NHS Leeds west clinical commissioning group patient empowerment project (PEP). In: Final Year One Report. Bradford: NHS Yorkshire and Humber Commissioning Support; 2015.
22.
go back to reference Dayson C. Social prescribing ‘plus’: a model of asset-based collaborative innovation? People. Place and Policy. 2017;11(2):90–104. Dayson C. Social prescribing ‘plus’: a model of asset-based collaborative innovation? People. Place and Policy. 2017;11(2):90–104.
23.
go back to reference Hemmings M. The constraints on voluntary sector voice in a period of continued austerity. Voluntary Sector Review. 2017;8(1):41–66.CrossRef Hemmings M. The constraints on voluntary sector voice in a period of continued austerity. Voluntary Sector Review. 2017;8(1):41–66.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Baker K, Irving A. Co-producing approaches to the Management of Dementia through social prescribing. Social Policy & Administration. 2016;50(3):379–97.CrossRef Baker K, Irving A. Co-producing approaches to the Management of Dementia through social prescribing. Social Policy & Administration. 2016;50(3):379–97.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Whitelaw S, Thirlwall C, Morrison A, Osborne J, Tattum L, Walker S. Developing and implementing a social prescribing initiative in primary care: insights into the possibility of normalisation and sustainability from a UK case study. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017;18(2):112–21.CrossRefPubMed Whitelaw S, Thirlwall C, Morrison A, Osborne J, Tattum L, Walker S. Developing and implementing a social prescribing initiative in primary care: insights into the possibility of normalisation and sustainability from a UK case study. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017;18(2):112–21.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Understanding the effectiveness and mechanisms of a social prescribing service: a mixed method analysis
Authors
James Woodall
Joanne Trigwell
Ann-Marie Bunyan
Gary Raine
Victoria Eaton
Joanne Davis
Lucy Hancock
Mary Cunningham
Sue Wilkinson
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3437-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Health Services Research 1/2018 Go to the issue