Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pediatrics 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research article

Understanding the child-doctor relationship in research participation: a qualitative study

Authors: Malou L. Luchtenberg, Els L. M. Maeckelberghe, Louise Locock, A. A. Eduard Verhagen

Published in: BMC Pediatrics | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Children have reported that one reason for participating in research is to help their doctor. This is potentially harmful if associated with coercive consent but might be beneficial for recruitment. We aimed to explore children’s perceptions of the child-doctor relationship in research.

Methods

This is a multicenter qualitative study with semi structured interviews performed between 2010 and 2011 (United Kingdom) and 2017–2019 (the Netherlands). Interviews took place nationwide at children’s homes. We performed a secondary analysis of the two datasets, combining an amplified analysis aimed to enlarge our dataset, and a supplementary analysis, which is a more in-depth investigation of emergent themes that were not fully addressed in the original studies. All participants had been involved in decisions about research participation, either as healthy volunteers, or as patients. Recruitment was aimed for a purposive maximum variation sample, and continued until data saturation occurred. We have studied how children perceived the child-doctor relationship in research. Interviews were audiotaped or videotaped, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed using Atlas.ti software.

Results

In total, 52 children were recruited aged 9 to 18, 29 in the United Kingdom and 23 in the Netherlands. Children’s decision-making depended strongly on support by research professionals, both in giving consent and during participation. Often, their treating physician was involved in the research process. Familiarity and trust were important and related to the extent to which children thought doctors understood their situation, were medically competent, showed support and care, and gave priority to the individual child’s safety. A trusting relationship led to a feeling of mutuality and enhanced children’s confidence. This resulted in improving their experiences throughout the entire research process. None of the participants reported that they felt compelled to participate in the research.

Conclusions

The child-doctor relationship in pediatric research should be characterized by familiarity and trust. This does not compromise children’s voluntary decision but enhances children’s confidence and might result in a feeling of mutuality. By addressing the participation of children as an iterative process during which treatment and research go hand in hand, the recruitment and participation of children in research can be improved.
Literature
4.
go back to reference U.N. General Assembly. Convention on the Rights of the Child 20 November 1989, Annu Rev Popul Law. 1989;16:501. U.N. General Assembly. Convention on the Rights of the Child 20 November 1989, Annu Rev Popul Law. 1989;16:501.
5.
go back to reference Unguru Y. Making sense of adolescent decision-making: Challenge and reality. Adolesc Med State Art Rev. 2011;22(2):195–206. Unguru Y. Making sense of adolescent decision-making: Challenge and reality. Adolesc Med State Art Rev. 2011;22(2):195–206.
6.
go back to reference Grootens-Wiegers P, Visser EG, van Rossum AMC, et al. Perspectives of adolescents on decision making about participation in a biobank study: a pilot study. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2017;1(1):e000111. doi:10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000111. Grootens-Wiegers P, Visser EG, van Rossum AMC, et al. Perspectives of adolescents on decision making about participation in a biobank study: a pilot study. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2017;1(1):e000111. doi:10.​1136/​bmjpo-2017-000111.
9.
go back to reference Julia A, Snethen, Marion E, Broome KK, Janet A. Deatrick DBA. Family Patterns of Decision-Making in Pediatric Clinical Trials. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(3):223–32. doi:10.1002/nur.20130. Julia A, Snethen, Marion E, Broome KK, Janet A. Deatrick DBA. Family Patterns of Decision-Making in Pediatric Clinical Trials. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(3):223–32. doi:10.​1002/​nur.​20130.
10.
11.
go back to reference Miller VA. Parent-Child Collaborative Decision Making for the Management of Chronic Illness: A Qualitative Analysis. Fam Syst Heal. 2009;27(3):249–66. doi:10.1037/a0017308.CrossRef Miller VA. Parent-Child Collaborative Decision Making for the Management of Chronic Illness: A Qualitative Analysis. Fam Syst Heal. 2009;27(3):249–66. doi:10.​1037/​a0017308.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dekking SAS, van der Graaf R, van Delden JJM. Strengths and weaknesses of guideline approaches to safeguard voluntary informed consent of patients within a dependent relationship. BMC Med. 2014;12(1):1–11. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-12-52.CrossRef Dekking SAS, van der Graaf R, van Delden JJM. Strengths and weaknesses of guideline approaches to safeguard voluntary informed consent of patients within a dependent relationship. BMC Med. 2014;12(1):1–11. doi:10.​1186/​1741-7015-12-52.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Roth-Cline M, Nelson RM. Parental permission and child assent in research on children. Yale J Biol Med. 2013;86(3):291–301.PubMedPubMedCentral Roth-Cline M, Nelson RM. Parental permission and child assent in research on children. Yale J Biol Med. 2013;86(3):291–301.PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Charmaz K. Constructionism and the Grounded Theory. In: Holstein JA, Gubrium JF, editors. Handbook of Constructionist Research (1st Edit). New York: The Guilford Press; 2008. pp. 397–412. Charmaz K. Constructionism and the Grounded Theory. In: Holstein JA, Gubrium JF, editors. Handbook of Constructionist Research (1st Edit). New York: The Guilford Press; 2008. pp. 397–412.
24.
go back to reference Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (1st Edit). London: Sage; 2006. pp 1–208. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (1st Edit). London: Sage; 2006. pp 1–208.
26.
go back to reference Bryman A. Social Research Methods. Fifth Edit. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016. pp. 572–88, 691. Bryman A. Social Research Methods. Fifth Edit. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016. pp. 572–88, 691.
27.
go back to reference Heaton J. Reworking Qualitative Data (1st Edit). London: Sage; 2004. p38. Heaton J. Reworking Qualitative Data (1st Edit). London: Sage; 2004. p38.
32.
33.
go back to reference Janvier A, Farlow B, Barrington KJ, Bourque CJ, Brazg T, Wilfond B. Building trust and improving communication with parents of children with Trisomy 13 and 18: A mixed-methods study. 2019. doi: 10.1177/0269216319860662. Janvier A, Farlow B, Barrington KJ, Bourque CJ, Brazg T, Wilfond B. Building trust and improving communication with parents of children with Trisomy 13 and 18: A mixed-methods study. 2019. doi: 10.​1177/​0269216319860662​.
34.
go back to reference Boland L, Graham ID, Légaré F, et al. Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared decision-making: A systematic review. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1). doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0851-5. Boland L, Graham ID, Légaré F, et al. Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared decision-making: A systematic review. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1). doi:10.​1186/​s13012-018-0851-5.
35.
go back to reference Dekking SAS, van der Graaf R, Schouten-van Meeteren AYN, Kars MC, van Delden JJM. A Qualitative Study into Dependent Relationships and Voluntary Informed Consent for Research in Pediatric Oncology. Pediatr Drugs. 2016;18(2):145–56. 10.1007/s40272-015-0158. .CrossRef Dekking SAS, van der Graaf R, Schouten-van Meeteren AYN, Kars MC, van Delden JJM. A Qualitative Study into Dependent Relationships and Voluntary Informed Consent for Research in Pediatric Oncology. Pediatr Drugs. 2016;18(2):145–56. 10.​1007/​s40272-015-0158. .CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Samuel GN, Dheensa S, Farsides B, Fenwick A, Lucassen A. Healthcare professionals’ and patients’ perspectives on consent to clinical genetic testing: Moving towards a more relational approach. BMC Med Ethics. 2017;18(1):1–11. 10.1186/s12910-017-0207. .CrossRef Samuel GN, Dheensa S, Farsides B, Fenwick A, Lucassen A. Healthcare professionals’ and patients’ perspectives on consent to clinical genetic testing: Moving towards a more relational approach. BMC Med Ethics. 2017;18(1):1–11. 10.​1186/​s12910-017-0207. .CrossRef
38.
Metadata
Title
Understanding the child-doctor relationship in research participation: a qualitative study
Authors
Malou L. Luchtenberg
Els L. M. Maeckelberghe
Louise Locock
A. A. Eduard Verhagen
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pediatrics / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2431
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02243-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Pediatrics 1/2020 Go to the issue