Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research article

Understanding pregnancy planning in a low-income country setting: validation of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Malawi

Authors: Jennifer Hall, Geraldine Barrett, Nicholas Mbwana, Andrew Copas, Address Malata, Judith Stephenson

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP) is a new and psychometrically valid measure of pregnancy intention that was developed in the United Kingdom. An improved understanding of pregnancy intention in low-income countries, where unintended pregnancies are common and maternal and neonatal deaths are high, is necessary to inform policies to address the unmet need for family planning. To this end this research aimed to validate the LMUP for use in the Chichewa language in Malawi.

Methods

Three Chichewa speakers translated the LMUP and one translation was agreed which was back-translated and pre-tested on five pregnant women using cognitive interviews. The measure was field tested with pregnant women who were recruited at antenatal clinics and data were analysed using classical test theory and hypothesis testing.

Results

125 women aged 15–43 (median 23), with parities of 1–8 (median 2) completed the Chichewa LMUP. There were no missing data. The full range of LMUP scores was captured. In terms of reliability, the scale was internally consistent (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.78) and test-retest data from 70 women showed good stability (weighted Kappa 0.80). In terms of validity, hypothesis testing confirmed that unmarried women (p = 0.003), women who had four or more children alive (p = 0.0051) and women who were below 20 or over 29 (p = 0.0115) were all more likely to have unintended pregnancies. Principal component analysis showed that five of the six items loaded onto one factor, with a further item borderline. A sensitivity analysis to assess the effect of the removal of the weakest item of the scale showed slightly improved performance but as the LMUP was not significantly adversely affected by its inclusion we recommend retaining the six-item score.

Conclusion

The Chichewa LMUP is a valid and reliable measure of pregnancy intention in Malawi and can now be used in research and/or surveillance. This is the first validation of this tool in a low-income country, helping to demonstrate that the concept of pregnancy planning is applicable in such a setting. Use of the Chichewa LMUP can enhance our understanding of pregnancy intention in Malawi, giving insight into the family planning services that are required to better meet women’s needs and save lives.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Singh S, Darroch J: Adding It Up: Costs and Benefits of Contraceptive Services. 2012, New York: Guttmacher Institute Singh S, Darroch J: Adding It Up: Costs and Benefits of Contraceptive Services. 2012, New York: Guttmacher Institute
2.
go back to reference Bachrach CA, Newcomer S: Intended pregnancies and unintended pregnancies: distinct categories or opposite ends of a continuum?. Fam plann perspect. 1999, 31 (5): 251-252. 10.2307/2991577.CrossRefPubMed Bachrach CA, Newcomer S: Intended pregnancies and unintended pregnancies: distinct categories or opposite ends of a continuum?. Fam plann perspect. 1999, 31 (5): 251-252. 10.2307/2991577.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Barrett G, Smith S, Wellings K: Conceptualisation, development and evaluation of a measure of unplanned pregnancy. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004, 58: 426-433. 10.1136/jech.2003.014787.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barrett G, Smith S, Wellings K: Conceptualisation, development and evaluation of a measure of unplanned pregnancy. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004, 58: 426-433. 10.1136/jech.2003.014787.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Barrett G, Wellings K: What is a 'planned' pregnancy? Empirical data from a British study. Soc Sci Med. 2002, 55: 545-557. 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00187-3.CrossRefPubMed Barrett G, Wellings K: What is a 'planned' pregnancy? Empirical data from a British study. Soc Sci Med. 2002, 55: 545-557. 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00187-3.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Petersen R, Moos M: Defining and measuring unintended pregnancy: Issues and concerns. Women Health Iss. 1997, 7 (4): 234-240. 10.1016/S1049-3867(97)00009-1.CrossRef Petersen R, Moos M: Defining and measuring unintended pregnancy: Issues and concerns. Women Health Iss. 1997, 7 (4): 234-240. 10.1016/S1049-3867(97)00009-1.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Santelli J, Rochat R, Hatfield-Timajchy K, Gilbert B, Curtis KM, Cabral R, Hirsch J, Schieve L, et al: The Measurement and Meaning of Unintended Pregnancy. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003, 35: 94-101. 10.1363/3509403.CrossRefPubMed Santelli J, Rochat R, Hatfield-Timajchy K, Gilbert B, Curtis KM, Cabral R, Hirsch J, Schieve L, et al: The Measurement and Meaning of Unintended Pregnancy. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003, 35: 94-101. 10.1363/3509403.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Santelli JS, Lindberg LD, Orr MG, Finer LB, Speizer I: Toward a multidimensional measure of pregnancy intentions: evidence from the United States. Stud Fam Plann. 2009, 40 (2): 87-100. 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2009.00192.x.CrossRefPubMed Santelli JS, Lindberg LD, Orr MG, Finer LB, Speizer I: Toward a multidimensional measure of pregnancy intentions: evidence from the United States. Stud Fam Plann. 2009, 40 (2): 87-100. 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2009.00192.x.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Speizer IS, Santelli JS, Afable-Munsuz A, Kendall C: Measuring factors underlying intendedness of women's first and later pregnancies. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004, 36 (5): 198-205. 10.1363/3619804.CrossRefPubMed Speizer IS, Santelli JS, Afable-Munsuz A, Kendall C: Measuring factors underlying intendedness of women's first and later pregnancies. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004, 36 (5): 198-205. 10.1363/3619804.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Stanford JB, Hobbs R, Jameson P, DeWitt MJ, Fischer RC: Defining dimensions of pregnancy intendedness. Matern Child Health J. 2000, 4 (3): 183-189. 10.1023/A:1009575514205.CrossRefPubMed Stanford JB, Hobbs R, Jameson P, DeWitt MJ, Fischer RC: Defining dimensions of pregnancy intendedness. Matern Child Health J. 2000, 4 (3): 183-189. 10.1023/A:1009575514205.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Morof D, Steinauer J, Haider S, Liu S, Darney P, et al: Evaluation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in a United States Population of Women. PLoS ONE. 2012, 7 (7): e35381-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morof D, Steinauer J, Haider S, Liu S, Darney P, et al: Evaluation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in a United States Population of Women. PLoS ONE. 2012, 7 (7): e35381-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Rocca CH, Krishnan S, Barrett G, Wilson M: Measuring pregnancy planning: An assessment of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among urban, south Indian women. Demogr Res. 2010, 23: 293-334.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rocca CH, Krishnan S, Barrett G, Wilson M: Measuring pregnancy planning: An assessment of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among urban, south Indian women. Demogr Res. 2010, 23: 293-334.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, Bank W: Trends in maternal mortality 1990–2010. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank estimates. 2012, Geneva: World Health Organization WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, Bank W: Trends in maternal mortality 1990–2010. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank estimates. 2012, Geneva: World Health Organization
13.
go back to reference Malawi DHS: Malawi Demographic and Health Survey. Zomba, Malawi, and Calverton. 2010, Maryland, USA: NSO and ICF Macro Malawi DHS: Malawi Demographic and Health Survey. Zomba, Malawi, and Calverton. 2010, Maryland, USA: NSO and ICF Macro
14.
go back to reference Roscoe J: Fundamental Research Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. 1975, New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston, 2 Roscoe J: Fundamental Research Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. 1975, New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston, 2
15.
go back to reference Loewenthal K: An introduction to psychological tests and scales. 2001, London: Psychology Press, 2 Loewenthal K: An introduction to psychological tests and scales. 2001, London: Psychology Press, 2
16.
go back to reference Streiner D, Norman G: Health Measurement Scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2008, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 4CrossRef Streiner D, Norman G: Health Measurement Scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2008, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 4CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cronbach LJ: Essentials of psychologic testing. 1990, New York: Harper & Row, 5 Cronbach LJ: Essentials of psychologic testing. 1990, New York: Harper & Row, 5
18.
go back to reference Landis J, Koch G: Measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977, 33 (1): 159-174. 10.2307/2529310.CrossRefPubMed Landis J, Koch G: Measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977, 33 (1): 159-174. 10.2307/2529310.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kline P: The new psychometrics: science, psychology and measurement. 1998, London: Routledge Kline P: The new psychometrics: science, psychology and measurement. 1998, London: Routledge
Metadata
Title
Understanding pregnancy planning in a low-income country setting: validation of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Malawi
Authors
Jennifer Hall
Geraldine Barrett
Nicholas Mbwana
Andrew Copas
Address Malata
Judith Stephenson
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-200

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2013 Go to the issue