Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 2/2012

01-06-2012

Understanding Population-Based Site-Specific Cancer Incidence Rates in the USA

Authors: Ray M. Merrill, Arielle Sloan, Lelinneth B. Novilla

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

As compared with conventionally reported national population-based incidence rates, incidence rates better represent the “burden” of disease if they remove prevalent cases from the denominator. In order to reflect the “risk” in a disease-free population, rates should both exclude prevalent cases from the denominator and second or later diagnosed cases at the same site from the numerator. Five common cancers were evaluated through a correction method using 2005–2007 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program data to determine the extent of difference between conventional and corrected incidence rates. These corrections lowered the incidence rates 4.0–5.8% for female breast cancer, 4.6–7.6% for melanoma, 3.0–4.0% for colorectal cancer, and 2.1–2.5% for lung and bronchus cancer. Corrected incidence rates for prostate cancer were 9.9–13.7% higher. In cancers with either high prevalence and/or high occurrence of multiple primaries at the same site, corrected population-based incidence rates are warranted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Krapcho M, et al (eds) (2010) SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2007. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2007/, based on November 2009 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, 2010. Accessed April 11, 2011 Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Krapcho M, et al (eds) (2010) SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2007. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. http://​seer.​cancer.​gov/​csr/​1975_​2007/​, based on November 2009 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, 2010. Accessed April 11, 2011
2.
go back to reference Merrill RM, Feuer EJ (1996) Risk-adjusted cancer incidence rates (United States). Cancer Causes Control 7(5):544–552PubMedCrossRef Merrill RM, Feuer EJ (1996) Risk-adjusted cancer incidence rates (United States). Cancer Causes Control 7(5):544–552PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hankey BF, Ries LA, Edwards BK (1999) The surveillance, epidemiology and end results program: a national resource. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8(12):1117–1121PubMed Hankey BF, Ries LA, Edwards BK (1999) The surveillance, epidemiology and end results program: a national resource. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8(12):1117–1121PubMed
4.
go back to reference Gloeckler Ries LA, Reichman ME, Lewis DR, Hankey BF, Edwards BK (2003) Cancer survival and incidence from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Oncologist 8(6):541–552PubMedCrossRef Gloeckler Ries LA, Reichman ME, Lewis DR, Hankey BF, Edwards BK (2003) Cancer survival and incidence from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Oncologist 8(6):541–552PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Percy C, Van Holten B, Muir C (eds) (1990) International classification of disease for oncology, 2nd edn. World Health Organization, Geneva Percy C, Van Holten B, Muir C (eds) (1990) International classification of disease for oncology, 2nd edn. World Health Organization, Geneva
7.
go back to reference Raymond JS, Hogue JRC (2006) Multiple primary tumours in women following breast cancer, 1973–2000. Brit J Cancer 94(11):1745–1750PubMed Raymond JS, Hogue JRC (2006) Multiple primary tumours in women following breast cancer, 1973–2000. Brit J Cancer 94(11):1745–1750PubMed
8.
go back to reference Bray F, Parkin DM (2009) Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness. Eur J Cancer 45(5):747–755PubMedCrossRef Bray F, Parkin DM (2009) Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness. Eur J Cancer 45(5):747–755PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference NCI (2010) DevCan: probability of developing or dying of cancer software, version 6.5.0. Statistical Research and Applications Branch, National Cancer Institute, 2010. http://srab.cancer.gov/devcan Accessed April 11, 2011 NCI (2010) DevCan: probability of developing or dying of cancer software, version 6.5.0. Statistical Research and Applications Branch, National Cancer Institute, 2010. http://​srab.​cancer.​gov/​devcan Accessed April 11, 2011
Metadata
Title
Understanding Population-Based Site-Specific Cancer Incidence Rates in the USA
Authors
Ray M. Merrill
Arielle Sloan
Lelinneth B. Novilla
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-011-0266-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Journal of Cancer Education 2/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine