Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research

Understanding patient engagement in health system decision-making: a co-designed scoping review

Authors: Tamara L. McCarron, Karen Moffat, Gloria Wilkinson, Sandra Zelinsky, Jamie M. Boyd, Deborah White, Derek Hassay, Diane L. Lorenzetti, Nancy J. Marlett, Thomas Noseworthy

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

With healthcare striving to shift to a more person-centered delivery model, patient and family involvement must have a bigger role in shaping this. While many initiatives involving patients and family members focus on self-care, a broader understanding of patient participation is necessary. Ensuring a viable and sustainable critical number of qualified patients and family members to support this shift will be of utmost importance. The purpose of this study was to understand how health systems are intentionally investing in the training and skill development of patients and family members.

Methods

Patient co-investigators and researchers conducted a scoping review of the existing literature on methods adopted by healthcare systems to build the skills and capacity of patients to participate in healthcare decision-making using a recognized methodological framework. Six electronic databases were searched to identify studies. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts and full-text papers for inclusion. The research team independently extracted data. Any disagreements were resolved by achieving consensus through discussion. Quantitative and qualitative content synthesis, as well as a quality assessment, was conducted.

Results

After eliminating duplicates, the search resulted in 9428 abstracts. Four hundred fifty-eight articles were reviewed and 15 articles were included. Four themes emerged: forums (33%), patient instructors (20%), workshops (33%), and co-design (13%). Four of the identified studies measured the impact and overall effectiveness of the respective programs. Examples of how patient and family members were supported (invested in) included advocacy training to support future involvement in engagement activities, a training program to conduct patient-led research, involvement in an immersive experience-based co-design initiative, and involvement in training pharmacy students. Overall, these studies found positive outcomes when patients and family members were recipients of these opportunities.

Conclusions

The results of this scoping review demonstrate that an evidence base around programs to advance patient engagement is largely absent. An opportunity exists for further research to identify strategies and measures to support patient engagement in healthcare decision-making.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Carman KL, et al. Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):223–31.CrossRef Carman KL, et al. Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):223–31.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Garces JP, et al. In: M. Clinic, editor. Eliciting patient perspective in patient-centered outcomes research: a meta narrative systematic review. Rochester: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; 2012. Garces JP, et al. In: M. Clinic, editor. Eliciting patient perspective in patient-centered outcomes research: a meta narrative systematic review. Rochester: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; 2012.
6.
go back to reference Taylor D, et al. Effectiveness of tai chi as a community-based falls prevention intervention: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(5):841–8.CrossRefPubMed Taylor D, et al. Effectiveness of tai chi as a community-based falls prevention intervention: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(5):841–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Baker GR. In: C.F.o.H. Improvement, editor. Evidence boost: a review of research highlighting how patient engagement contributes to improved care; 2014. Baker GR. In: C.F.o.H. Improvement, editor. Evidence boost: a review of research highlighting how patient engagement contributes to improved care; 2014.
8.
go back to reference Sarrami P, et al. Consumer and community engagement: a review of the literature. Australia: Australian Institute of Health Innovation; 2012. Sarrami P, et al. Consumer and community engagement: a review of the literature. Australia: Australian Institute of Health Innovation; 2012.
10.
go back to reference Charmel PA, Frampton SB. Building the business case for patient-centered care. Healthcare Financ Manage. 2008;62(3):80–5. Charmel PA, Frampton SB. Building the business case for patient-centered care. Healthcare Financ Manage. 2008;62(3):80–5.
12.
go back to reference Coulter A. Engaging patient in healthcare. United Kingdom: Ashford Colout Press; 2011. Coulter A. Engaging patient in healthcare. United Kingdom: Ashford Colout Press; 2011.
13.
go back to reference Brett J, et al. The PIRICOM study: a systematic review of the conceptualisation, measurement, impact and outcomes of patients and public involvement in health and social care research. Warwick: University of Warwick; 2010. Brett J, et al. The PIRICOM study: a systematic review of the conceptualisation, measurement, impact and outcomes of patients and public involvement in health and social care research. Warwick: University of Warwick; 2010.
15.
go back to reference Hibbard HJ. Engaging health care consumers to improve the quality of care. Med Care. 2003;41(1 Suppl):I–61-I-70.CrossRef Hibbard HJ. Engaging health care consumers to improve the quality of care. Med Care. 2003;41(1 Suppl):I–61-I-70.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Barello S, Graffigna G, Vegni E. Patient engagement as an emerging challenge for healthcare services: mapping the literature. Nurs Res Pract. 2012;2012:7. Barello S, Graffigna G, Vegni E. Patient engagement as an emerging challenge for healthcare services: mapping the literature. Nurs Res Pract. 2012;2012:7.
21.
go back to reference Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.CrossRef Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.CrossRef
23.
24.
go back to reference Daudt HML, van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Daudt HML, van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Booth A. Clear and present questions: formulating questions for evidence based practice. Library Hi Tech. 2006;24(3):355–68.CrossRef Booth A. Clear and present questions: formulating questions for evidence based practice. Library Hi Tech. 2006;24(3):355–68.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Tricco A, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467.CrossRefPubMed Tricco A, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Bate P, Robert G. Bringing user experience to healthcare improvement: the concepts. Methods and practices of experience-based design. Oxford; New York: Radcliff Publishers; 2007. Bate P, Robert G. Bringing user experience to healthcare improvement: the concepts. Methods and practices of experience-based design. Oxford; New York: Radcliff Publishers; 2007.
28.
go back to reference Sanders EBN, Stappers PJ. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign. 2008;4(1):5–18.CrossRef Sanders EBN, Stappers PJ. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign. 2008;4(1):5–18.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Glaser BG. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl. 1965;12(4):436–45.CrossRef Glaser BG. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl. 1965;12(4):436–45.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Marlett N, et al. Building new roles and relationships in research: a model of patient engagement research. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(5):1057–67.CrossRefPubMed Marlett N, et al. Building new roles and relationships in research: a model of patient engagement research. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(5):1057–67.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference McElfish PA, et al. Engagement practices that join scientific methods with community wisdom: designing a patient-centered, randomized control trial with a Pacific Islander community. Nurs Inq. 2016:20. McElfish PA, et al. Engagement practices that join scientific methods with community wisdom: designing a patient-centered, randomized control trial with a Pacific Islander community. Nurs Inq. 2016:20.
35.
go back to reference Davis C, Salo L, Redman S. Evaluating the effectiveness of advocacy training for breast cancer advocates in Australia. Eur J Cancer Care. 2001;10(2):82–6.CrossRef Davis C, Salo L, Redman S. Evaluating the effectiveness of advocacy training for breast cancer advocates in Australia. Eur J Cancer Care. 2001;10(2):82–6.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Shelton RC, et al. Training experiences of lay and professional patient navigators for colorectal cancer screening. J Cancer Educ. 2011;26(2):277–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shelton RC, et al. Training experiences of lay and professional patient navigators for colorectal cancer screening. J Cancer Educ. 2011;26(2):277–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Jha V, et al. Patients as teachers: a randomised controlled trial on the use of personal stories of harm to raise awareness of patient safety for doctors in training. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(1):21–30 10p.CrossRefPubMed Jha V, et al. Patients as teachers: a randomised controlled trial on the use of personal stories of harm to raise awareness of patient safety for doctors in training. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(1):21–30 10p.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Shah R, Savage I, Kapadia S. Patients’ experience of educating pharmacy undergraduate students. Pharm Educ. 2005;5(1):61–7.CrossRef Shah R, Savage I, Kapadia S. Patients’ experience of educating pharmacy undergraduate students. Pharm Educ. 2005;5(1):61–7.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Andejeski Y, et al. Quantitative impact of including consumers in the scientific review of breast cancer research proposals. J Womens Health Gender Based Med. 2002;11(4):379–88 10p.CrossRef Andejeski Y, et al. Quantitative impact of including consumers in the scientific review of breast cancer research proposals. J Womens Health Gender Based Med. 2002;11(4):379–88 10p.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Tischler V, et al. Involving patients in research: the challenge of patient-centredness. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2010;56(6):623–33.CrossRefPubMed Tischler V, et al. Involving patients in research: the challenge of patient-centredness. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2010;56(6):623–33.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Boaz A, et al. What patients do and their impact on implementation. J Health Organ Manage. 2016;30(2):258–78.CrossRef Boaz A, et al. What patients do and their impact on implementation. J Health Organ Manage. 2016;30(2):258–78.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Boyd H, et al. Improving healthcare through the use of co-design. N Z Med J. 2012;125(1357):76–87.PubMed Boyd H, et al. Improving healthcare through the use of co-design. N Z Med J. 2012;125(1357):76–87.PubMed
49.
go back to reference Riese C, et al. Effectiveness of a standardized patient education program on therapy-related side effects and unplanned therapy interruptions in oral cancer therapy: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(11):3475–83.CrossRefPubMed Riese C, et al. Effectiveness of a standardized patient education program on therapy-related side effects and unplanned therapy interruptions in oral cancer therapy: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(11):3475–83.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Pushparajah D, Geissler J, Westergaard N. EUPATI: collaboration between patients, academia and industry to champion the informed patient in the research and development of medicines. J Med Dev Sci. 2015;1(1):74–80.CrossRef Pushparajah D, Geissler J, Westergaard N. EUPATI: collaboration between patients, academia and industry to champion the informed patient in the research and development of medicines. J Med Dev Sci. 2015;1(1):74–80.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Carman K, Workman K. Engaging patients and consumers in research evidence: applying the conceptual model of patient and family engagement. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;100(2017):25–39.PubMed Carman K, Workman K. Engaging patients and consumers in research evidence: applying the conceptual model of patient and family engagement. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;100(2017):25–39.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Understanding patient engagement in health system decision-making: a co-designed scoping review
Authors
Tamara L. McCarron
Karen Moffat
Gloria Wilkinson
Sandra Zelinsky
Jamie M. Boyd
Deborah White
Derek Hassay
Diane L. Lorenzetti
Nancy J. Marlett
Thomas Noseworthy
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-0994-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Systematic Reviews 1/2019 Go to the issue