Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Surgery International 5/2016

01-05-2016 | Original Article

Understanding parental refusal of permission for child participation in surgical prospective trials

Authors: Katherine W. Gonzalez, Obinna O. Adibe, Brian G. Dalton, Amita A. Desai, Susan W. Sharp, Shawn D. St. Peter

Published in: Pediatric Surgery International | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The success of prospective randomized trials relies on voluntary participation, which has been perceived as a barrier for successful trials in children who rely on parental permission. We sought to identify the reasons parents decline child participation to understand potential limitations in the consent process.

Methods

A prospective observational study was conducted in 92 patients asked to participate in prospective randomized trials between 2012 and 2015. Parental reasons for refusal were documented.

Results

The 92 refusals were distributed between studies investigating the management of circumcision, gastroschisis, pectus excavatum, appendicitis, pyloric stenosis, undescended testicles, abdominal abscess and gastroesophageal reflux. Reasons for refusal included preference of treatment path (37 %), inability to follow up (21 %), unspecified resistance to participate in research (18 %), preference to maintain independent surgeon decision (16 %), and desire for historically standard treatment (8 %). Of the families who opted to pursue a specific treatment arm rather than randomization, 35 % had prior experience with that treatment, 32 % had researched the procedure, 18 % wished to pursue the minimal intervention and 15 % did not specify.

Conclusions

Parental preference of therapy is the most common reason for refusal of study participation. This variable could be influenced with more effective explanation of study rationale and existing equipoise.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM (2003) Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA 290(12):1624–1632CrossRefPubMed Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM (2003) Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA 290(12):1624–1632CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C (2000) What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 283(20):2701–2711CrossRefPubMed Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C (2000) What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 283(20):2701–2711CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Ostlie DJ, St. Peter SD (2010) The current state of evidence-based pediatric surgery. J Pediatr Surg 45(10):1940–1946CrossRefPubMed Ostlie DJ, St. Peter SD (2010) The current state of evidence-based pediatric surgery. J Pediatr Surg 45(10):1940–1946CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Yap TY, Yamokoski AD, Hizlan S, Zyzanski SJ, Angiolillo AL, Rheingold SR et al (2010) Informed consent for pediatric phase 1 cancer trials: physicians’ perspectives. Cancer 116(13):3244–3250CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yap TY, Yamokoski AD, Hizlan S, Zyzanski SJ, Angiolillo AL, Rheingold SR et al (2010) Informed consent for pediatric phase 1 cancer trials: physicians’ perspectives. Cancer 116(13):3244–3250CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Johnson LM, Leek AC, Drotar D, Noll RB, Rheingold SR, Kodish ED et al (2015) Practical communication guidance to improve phase 1 informed consent conversations and decision-making in pediatric oncology. Cancer 121(14):2439–2448CrossRefPubMed Johnson LM, Leek AC, Drotar D, Noll RB, Rheingold SR, Kodish ED et al (2015) Practical communication guidance to improve phase 1 informed consent conversations and decision-making in pediatric oncology. Cancer 121(14):2439–2448CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Grootens-Wiegers P, de Vries MC, van Beusekkom MM, van Dijck L, van den Broek JM (2015) Comic strips help children understand medical research: targeting the informed consent procedure to children’s needs. Patient Educ Couns 98(4):518–524CrossRefPubMed Grootens-Wiegers P, de Vries MC, van Beusekkom MM, van Dijck L, van den Broek JM (2015) Comic strips help children understand medical research: targeting the informed consent procedure to children’s needs. Patient Educ Couns 98(4):518–524CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Dahl A, Sinha M, Rosenberg DI, Tran M, Valdez A (2015) Assessing physician–parent communication during emergency medical procedures in children: an observational study in a low-literacy Latino patient population. Pediatr Emerg Care 31(5):339–342CrossRefPubMed Dahl A, Sinha M, Rosenberg DI, Tran M, Valdez A (2015) Assessing physician–parent communication during emergency medical procedures in children: an observational study in a low-literacy Latino patient population. Pediatr Emerg Care 31(5):339–342CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Understanding parental refusal of permission for child participation in surgical prospective trials
Authors
Katherine W. Gonzalez
Obinna O. Adibe
Brian G. Dalton
Amita A. Desai
Susan W. Sharp
Shawn D. St. Peter
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0179-0358
Electronic ISSN: 1437-9813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-016-3878-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Pediatric Surgery International 5/2016 Go to the issue