Top

Implementation Science

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Methodology

Understanding contexts: how explanatory theories can help

Author: Frank Davidoff

Published in: Implementation Science | Issue 1/2019

Abstract

Objective

To rethink the nature and roles of context in ways that help improvers implement effective, sustained improvement interventions in healthcare quality and safety.

Design

Critical analysis of existing concepts of context; synthesis of those concepts into a framework for the construction of explanatory theories of human environments, including healthcare systems.

Data sources

Published literature in improvement science, as well as in social, organization, and management sciences. Relevant content was sought by iteratively building searches from reference lists in relevant documents.

Results

Scientific thought is represented in both causal and explanatory theories. Explanatory theories are multi-variable constructs used to make sense of complex events and situations; they include basic operating principles of explanation, most importantly: transferring new meaning to complex and confusing phenomena; separating out individual components of an event or situation; unifying the components into a coherent construct (model); and adapting that construct to fit its intended uses. Contexts of human activities can be usefully represented as explanatory theories of peoples’ environments; they are valuable to the extent they can be translated into practical changes in behaviors.

Healthcare systems are among the most complex human environments known. Although no single explanatory theory adequately represents those environments, multiple mature theories of human action, taken together, can usually make sense of them. Current mature theories of context include static models, universal-plus-variable models, activity theory and related models, and the FITT framework (Fit between Individuals, Tasks, and Technologies). Explanatory theories represent contexts most effectively when they include basic explanatory principles.

Conclusions

Healthcare systems can usefully be represented in explanatory theories. Improvement interventions in healthcare quality and safety are most likely to bring about intended and sustained changes when improvers use explanatory theories to align interventions with the host systems into which they are being introduced.

Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D. Organizing and the process of sense-making. Organization Sci. 2005;16:409–21.CrossRef

Bate P. Context is everything. In: Perspectives on context. London: The Health Foundation; 2014. p. 1–29.

Squires JE, Graham ID, Hutchinson AM, Michie S, Francis, JJ, Sales A, et al. Identifying the domains of context important to implementation science: a study protocol. Implement Sci. 2015;10:135. Doi: 10:1186/s13012–015-0325-y.

Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, et al. SQUIRE 2.0 Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence: revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411.

Vandenbroucke JP. Observational research, randomized trials, and two views of medical science. PLoS Med. 2008;5:c67. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050067.CrossRef

Davidoff F, Dixon-Woods M, Leviton L, Michie S. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Qual Saf 2015;24:228–238. doi 1136/bmjqs-2014-003627.

Clarke KA, Primo DM. A model discipline. Political science and the logic of representations. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.

Berwick DM, Godfrey AB, Roessner J. Curing healthcare: new strategies for quality improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2003.

Braithwaite, J., Churruca, K., Ellis, LA, et al. Complexity science in healthcare –aspirations, approaches, applications and accomplishments: a white paper. Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University: Sydney; 2017; https://www.researchgate.net/publications/319643112. Accessed 1–23-19.

10.

Greenhalgh T. Systems. In: How to implement evidence-based medicine. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2018.

11.

Nardi BA. Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1995:69-102.

12.

Greenhalgh T, Stones R. Theorising big IT programs in healthcare: Strong structuration theory meets actor-network theory. Soc Sci Med; 2010;70:1285–1294. doi: 10.10.16/j.socscimed.2009.12.034.

13.

Pitt JC. Theories of explanation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1988.

14.

Glouberman S, Zimmerman B. Complicated and complex systems: what would successful reform of Medicare look like? Toronto: Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada; 2002. Accessed 8–24-18

15.

Hempel CG, Oppenheim P. Studies in the logic of explanation. In: Pitt JC, editor. Theories of explanation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1988. p. 9–50.

16.

Salmon WC. Statistical explanation and causality. In: Pitt JC, editor. Theories of explanation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1988. p. 75–118.

17.

Radford A. Transformational grammar. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 1988.CrossRef

18.

Purcell GP, Shortliffe EH. Contextual models of clinical publications for enhancing retrieval from full-text databases. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995:851–7.

19.

Moskovitch P, Martins SB, Behiri E, et al. A comparative evaluation of full-text, concept-based, and context-sensitive search. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(2):164–74 Epub 2007 Jan 9.CrossRef

20.

Jaynes J. The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1990.

21.

Kitcher P. Explanatory Unification, In Pitt, reference 11, pp. 167–87.

22.

Sheridan TB. Modeling human-system interaction. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2017.CrossRef

23.

Gopnik, A. Rewriting nature. Charles Darwin, natural novelist. The New Yorker, October 23, 2006.

24.

Wears RL, Barsky CL, Perry DJ. Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management. In: Broberg O, Fallentin N, Hasle P, et al., editors. Control modes in care delivery organizations: Nordic Ergonomics Society Annual Conference, XI; 2014. p. 957–6.

25.

Tilly C. Why? What happens when people give reasons…and why. Princeton University Press: Princeton; 2006.

26.

Schulz L. Infants explore the unexpected. Science. 2015;348:42–3.CrossRef

27.

Weick KE. Making sense of the organization. The impermanent organization. Volume 2. Chichester, West Sussex (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2009.

28.

Daft RI, Weick KE. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad Manag Rev. 1984;9:284–95.CrossRef

29.

Dixon-Woods M, Bosk CL, Aveling EL, et al. Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of an improvement program. Milbank Q. 2011;89:167–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00625.x. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3142336/. Accessed 12 Mar 2018.

30.

Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2725–32. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa061115.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Schön DA. The reflective practitioner. Aldershot, Hants, UK: Ashgate; 1991.

32.

Bradley EH, Curry LA, Cherlin E, et al. Hospital strategies for reducing risk-stratified mortality rates in acute myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:618–26. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-00003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Kaplan HC, Provost LP, Froehle CM, et al. The model for understanding success in quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:13–20. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000010.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 accessed 12 Mar 2018.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Taylor SL, Dy S, Foy R, et al. What context features might be important determinants of the effectiveness of patient safety practice interventions? BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:611–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs.2010.049379 Epub 2011 May 26.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Gustafson DH, Sainfort F, Eichler M, et al. Developing and testing a model to predict outcomes of organizational change. Health Serv Res. 2003;38:751–76.CrossRef

37.

Bate P, Mendel P, Robert G. Organizing for quality. New York: Radcliffe Publishing; 2008.

38.

Greenhalgh T, Stones R. Theorizing big IT programs in healthcare: strong structuration theory meets actor-network theory. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70:1285–1294. doi 0.10.16/j.socscimed. 2009.12.034.

39.

Bernstein L. The unanswered question: whither music? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1981.

40.

Ammenwerth E, Iller C, Mahler C. IT-adoption and the interactions of task, technology, and individuals: a fit framework and a case study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006;6:3.CrossRef

41.

Lesselroth BJ, Yang J, McComachie J, et al. Addressing the sociotechnical drivers of quality improvement: a case study of post-operative DVT prophylaxis computerized decision support. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:381–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs.2010.042689 Epub 2011 Jan 5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Hawe P, Reilly T. Ecological theory in practice. Illustrations from a community-based intervention to promote the health of recent mothers. Prev Sci. 2005;6:227–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-005-0009-z.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Lanham HJ, McDaniel RR, Crabtree BF, Miller WL, Stange KC, Talka AF, et al. How improving practice relationships among clinicians and nonclinicians can improve quality in primary care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2009;35:457–456; PMCID:2928073.

44.

Leykum LK, Pugh J, Lawrence V, et al. Organizational interventions employing principles of complexity science have improved outcomes for patients with type II diabetes. Implementation Sci. 2007;2(28). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-28.

45.

Leykum LK, Parchman M, Pugh J, et al. The importance of organizational characteristics in patients with chronic disease: a systematic review of congestive heart failure. Implementation Sci. 2010;5:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-66.CrossRef

46.

Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T. Theorizing events in systems. Am J Community Psychol. 2009;43:267–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-009-9229-9.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Leykum LK, Lanham JH, Provost SM, et al. Improving outcomes of hospitalized patients: the physician relationships, improvising, and sense making protocol. Implementation Sci. 2014;9:171. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0171-3.CrossRef

48.

McAllister C, Leykum LK, Lanham H, et al. Relationships within impatient physician housestaff teams and their association with hospitalized patient outcomes. J Hosp Medicine. 2014;9:764–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2274 Epub 2014 Oct 30.CrossRef

49.

Bosk CL, Dixon-Woods M, Goeschel CA, Pronovost PJ. Reality check for checklists. Lancet 2009;374:444–445. PMID:19681190.

50.

Aveling EL, McCulloch P, Dixon-Woods M. A qualitative study comparing experiences of the surgical safety checklist in hospitals in high-income and low-income countries. BMJ Open. 2013:e003039. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003039.

51.

Macdonald H. H is for hawk. New York: Grove Press; 2014.

Title: Understanding contexts: how explanatory theories can help
Author: Frank Davidoff
Publication date: 01-12-2019
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: Implementation Science / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1748-5908
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0872-8

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Understanding contexts: how explanatory theories can help

Abstract

Objective

Design

Data sources

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objective

Design

Data sources

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Implementation of simulation modelling to improve service planning in specialist orthopaedic and neurosurgical outpatient services

Do the key functions of an intervention designed from the same specifications vary according to context? Investigating the transferability of a public health intervention in France

Elucidating the influence of supervisors’ roles on implementation climate

Specifying and comparing implementation strategies across seven large implementation interventions: a practical application of theory

Using implementation facilitation to implement primary care mental health integration via clinical video telehealth in rural clinics: protocol for a hybrid type 2 cluster randomized stepped-wedge design

Attributes of context relevant to healthcare professionals’ use of research evidence in clinical practice: a multi-study analysis