Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 4/2018

01-08-2018

Understanding Clinical Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: a Deep Learning Perspective

Authors: Aly A. Mohamed, Yahong Luo, Hong Peng, Rachel C. Jankowitz, Shandong Wu

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Mammographic breast density has been established as an independent risk marker for developing breast cancer. Breast density assessment is a routine clinical need in breast cancer screening and current standard is using the Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS) criteria including four qualitative categories (i.e., fatty, scattered density, heterogeneously dense, or extremely dense). In each mammogram examination, a breast is typically imaged with two different views, i.e., the mediolateral oblique (MLO) view and cranial caudal (CC) view. The BI-RADS-based breast density assessment is a qualitative process made by visual observation of both the MLO and CC views by radiologists, where there is a notable inter- and intra-reader variability. In order to maintain consistency and accuracy in BI-RADS-based breast density assessment, gaining understanding on radiologists’ reading behaviors will be educational. In this study, we proposed to leverage the newly emerged deep learning approach to investigate how the MLO and CC view images of a mammogram examination may have been clinically used by radiologists in coming up with a BI-RADS density category. We implemented a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning model, aimed at distinguishing the breast density categories using a large (15,415 images) set of real-world clinical mammogram images. Our results showed that the classification of density categories (in terms of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) using MLO view images is significantly higher than that using the CC view. This indicates that most likely it is the MLO view that the radiologists have predominately used to determine the breast density BI-RADS categories. Our study holds a potential to further interpret radiologists’ reading characteristics, enhance personalized clinical training to radiologists, and ultimately reduce reader variations in breast density assessment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Obenauer S, Hermann KP, Grabbe E: Applications and literature review of the BI-RADS classification. Eur Radiol 15:1027–1036, 2005CrossRefPubMed Obenauer S, Hermann KP, Grabbe E: Applications and literature review of the BI-RADS classification. Eur Radiol 15:1027–1036, 2005CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Huo CW, Chew GL, Britt KL et al.: Mammographic density—a review on the current understanding of its association with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 144:479–502, 2014CrossRefPubMed Huo CW, Chew GL, Britt KL et al.: Mammographic density—a review on the current understanding of its association with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 144:479–502, 2014CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Berg WA, Campassi C, Langenberg P, Sexton MJ: Breast imaging reporting and data system: inter-and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. Am J Roentgenol 174(6):1769–1777, 2000CrossRef Berg WA, Campassi C, Langenberg P, Sexton MJ: Breast imaging reporting and data system: inter-and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. Am J Roentgenol 174(6):1769–1777, 2000CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Shin H-C, Roth HR, Gao M, Lu L, Xu Z, Nogues I, Yao J, Mollura DJ, Summers RM: Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: CNN architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35(5):1285–1298, 2016CrossRefPubMed Shin H-C, Roth HR, Gao M, Lu L, Xu Z, Nogues I, Yao J, Mollura DJ, Summers RM: Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: CNN architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35(5):1285–1298, 2016CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Y. Bar, I. Diamant, L. Wolf, S. Lieberman, E. Konen, and H. Greenspan. Chest pathology detection using deep learning with non-medical training. In 2015 I.E. 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pages 294–297. IEEE, 2015. Y. Bar, I. Diamant, L. Wolf, S. Lieberman, E. Konen, and H. Greenspan. Chest pathology detection using deep learning with non-medical training. In 2015 I.E. 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pages 294–297. IEEE, 2015.
9.
go back to reference B. van Ginneken, A. A. Setio, C. Jacobs, and F. Ciompi. Off-the-shelf convolutional neural network features for pulmonary nodule detection in computed tomography scans. In 2015 I.E. 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pages 286–289. IEEE, 2015. B. van Ginneken, A. A. Setio, C. Jacobs, and F. Ciompi. Off-the-shelf convolutional neural network features for pulmonary nodule detection in computed tomography scans. In 2015 I.E. 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pages 286–289. IEEE, 2015.
10.
go back to reference Miao S, Wang ZJ, Liao R: A CNN regression approach for real-time 2D/3D registration. IEEE Trans Med Imag 35(5):1352–1363, May 2016CrossRef Miao S, Wang ZJ, Liao R: A CNN regression approach for real-time 2D/3D registration. IEEE Trans Med Imag 35(5):1352–1363, May 2016CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cheng, Jie-Zhi et al. Computer-aided diagnosis with deep learning architecture: applications to breast lesions in US images and pulmonary nodules in CT scans. Scientific Reports 6 (2016): 24454. PMC. Web. 25 Apr. 2017. Cheng, Jie-Zhi et al. Computer-aided diagnosis with deep learning architecture: applications to breast lesions in US images and pulmonary nodules in CT scans. Scientific Reports 6 (2016): 24454. PMC. Web. 25 Apr. 2017.
12.
go back to reference Kallenberg M et al.: Unsupervised deep learning applied to breast density segmentation and mammographic risk scoring. IEEE Trans Med Imag 35(5):1322–1331, 2016CrossRef Kallenberg M et al.: Unsupervised deep learning applied to breast density segmentation and mammographic risk scoring. IEEE Trans Med Imag 35(5):1322–1331, 2016CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Keller BM, Nathan DL, Wang Y, Zheng Y, Gee JC, Conant EF, Kontos D: Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation. Med Phys 39(8):4903–4917, 2012CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Keller BM, Nathan DL, Wang Y, Zheng Y, Gee JC, Conant EF, Kontos D: Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation. Med Phys 39(8):4903–4917, 2012CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
17.
go back to reference DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL: Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics:837–845, 1988 DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL: Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics:837–845, 1988
Metadata
Title
Understanding Clinical Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: a Deep Learning Perspective
Authors
Aly A. Mohamed
Yahong Luo
Hong Peng
Rachel C. Jankowitz
Shandong Wu
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-017-0022-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Journal of Digital Imaging 4/2018 Go to the issue