Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Under consumers’ scrutiny - an investigation into consumers’ attitudes and concerns about nudging in the realm of health behavior

Authors: Astrid F Junghans, Tracy TL Cheung, Denise DT De Ridder

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Nudging strategies have recently attracted attention from scholars and policy makers for their potential in influencing people’s behaviors on large scales. But is the fact that nudges do not forbid any choice-options or significantly alter people’s economic incentives sufficient to conclude that nudges should be implemented? While this is discussed amongst scholars from various disciplines the voices of consumers, the target-group of nudges, remain unheard. Since understanding their knowledge about nudging and their opinions on being nudged are crucial for the evaluation of the moral appropriateness of nudging, the current study examines consumers’ knowledge of and attitudes toward nudging in general and the realm of health behavior.

Methods

In this qualitative investigation in-depth semi-structured interviews with UK consumers were conducted to examine consumers’ attitudes to four domains of inquiry around which the scholarly discussions about nudging have revolved: consumers’ approval of nudging, consumers’ views on the origin of nudges, consumers’ perceived effectiveness of nudging, and consumers’ concerns about manipulative aspects of nudging.

Results

Interviews revealed that consumers are largely unfamiliar with the concept of nudging altogether. Once defined and explained to them most consumers approve of the concept, especially in the realm of health behavior, given particular conditions: 1. Nudges should be designed for benefiting individuals and society; 2. consumers comprehend the decision-making context and the reasoning behind the promotion of the targeted behavior. Interviews revealed very limited concerns with manipulative aspects of nudges.

Conclusions

These findings call for better information-management to ensure consumers knowledge of nudges and awareness of their current implementation. Under that condition the findings encourage the implementation of nudges benefitting individuals and society in domains that consumers comprehend, such as health behaviors. Further research is required to clarify consumers’ concerns and requirements for nudges in more complex domains such as financial decisions and retirement plans.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge, Improving Decisions on Health, Wealth and Happiness. New Haven CT: Yale University Press; 2008. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge, Improving Decisions on Health, Wealth and Happiness. New Haven CT: Yale University Press; 2008.
2.
go back to reference Hansen PG. Nudge for Good. Policy Options. 2013;34(5):3–29. Hansen PG. Nudge for Good. Policy Options. 2013;34(5):3–29.
3.
go back to reference Vallgårda S. Nudge – A new and better way to improve health? Health Policy. 2012;2012(104):200–3.CrossRef Vallgårda S. Nudge – A new and better way to improve health? Health Policy. 2012;2012(104):200–3.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference De Ridder DTD. Nudging for beginners: a shortlist of issues in urgent need of research. Eur Health Psychol. 2014;16(1):2–6. De Ridder DTD. Nudging for beginners: a shortlist of issues in urgent need of research. Eur Health Psychol. 2014;16(1):2–6.
5.
go back to reference Pykett J, Jones R, Whitehead M, Huxley M, Strauss K, Gill N, et al. Interventions in the political geography of ‘liberal paternalism’. Polit Geogr. 2011;30:301–10.CrossRef Pykett J, Jones R, Whitehead M, Huxley M, Strauss K, Gill N, et al. Interventions in the political geography of ‘liberal paternalism’. Polit Geogr. 2011;30:301–10.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wilkinson TM. Nudging and manipulation. Political Studies. 2013;61:341–55.CrossRef Wilkinson TM. Nudging and manipulation. Political Studies. 2013;61:341–55.CrossRef
7.
8.
go back to reference Hanks AS, Just DR, Smith LE, Wansink B. Healthy convenience: nudging students toward healthy choices in the lunchroom. J Public Health. 2012;34(3):370–6.CrossRef Hanks AS, Just DR, Smith LE, Wansink B. Healthy convenience: nudging students toward healthy choices in the lunchroom. J Public Health. 2012;34(3):370–6.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Maas J, De Ridder DTD, De Vet E, De Wit JBF. Do distant foods decrease intake? The effect of food accessibility on consumption. Psychol Health 2012. 2012;27(2):59–73.CrossRef Maas J, De Ridder DTD, De Vet E, De Wit JBF. Do distant foods decrease intake? The effect of food accessibility on consumption. Psychol Health 2012. 2012;27(2):59–73.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rozin P, Scott S, Dingley M, Urbanek JK, Jiang H, Kaltenbach M. Nudge to nobesity I: minor changes in accessibility decrease food intake. Judgment and Decision Making. 2012;6(4):323–32. Rozin P, Scott S, Dingley M, Urbanek JK, Jiang H, Kaltenbach M. Nudge to nobesity I: minor changes in accessibility decrease food intake. Judgment and Decision Making. 2012;6(4):323–32.
11.
go back to reference Calman K. Beyond the ‘nanny state’: stewardship and public health. Public Health. 2009;123:e6–10.CrossRefPubMed Calman K. Beyond the ‘nanny state’: stewardship and public health. Public Health. 2009;123:e6–10.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hausman DM, Welch B. Debate: to nudge or Not to nudge. J Polit Philos. 2010;18(1):123–36.CrossRef Hausman DM, Welch B. Debate: to nudge or Not to nudge. J Polit Philos. 2010;18(1):123–36.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Askegaard S, Ordabayeva N, Chandon P, Cheung T, Chytkova Z, et al. (forthcoming). Moralities in Food and Health Research. J Mark Manag, in press. Askegaard S, Ordabayeva N, Chandon P, Cheung T, Chytkova Z, et al. (forthcoming). Moralities in Food and Health Research. J Mark Manag, in press.
14.
go back to reference Schnellenbach J. Nudges and norms: on the political economy of soft paternalism. Eur J Polit Econ. 2012;28:266–77.CrossRef Schnellenbach J. Nudges and norms: on the political economy of soft paternalism. Eur J Polit Econ. 2012;28:266–77.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Seacat JD, Dougal SC, Roy D. A daily diary assessment of female weight stigmatization. J Health Psychol 2014:1–13 Seacat JD, Dougal SC, Roy D. A daily diary assessment of female weight stigmatization. J Health Psychol 2014:1–13
16.
go back to reference Diepeveen S, Ling T, Suhrcke M, Roland M, Marteau TM. Public acceptibility of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:756.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Diepeveen S, Ling T, Suhrcke M, Roland M, Marteau TM. Public acceptibility of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:756.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Marteau TM, Hollands GJ, Fletcher PC. Changing human behavior to prevent disease: the importance of targeting automatic processes. Science. 2012;337:1492–5.CrossRefPubMed Marteau TM, Hollands GJ, Fletcher PC. Changing human behavior to prevent disease: the importance of targeting automatic processes. Science. 2012;337:1492–5.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hollands GJ, Shemilt I, Marteau TM, Jebb SA, Kelly MP, Nakamura R, et al. Altering micro-environments to change population health behavior: towards an evidence base for choice architecture interventions. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1218.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hollands GJ, Shemilt I, Marteau TM, Jebb SA, Kelly MP, Nakamura R, et al. Altering micro-environments to change population health behavior: towards an evidence base for choice architecture interventions. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1218.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Bauer MW, Gaskell G, Allum NC. Quality, Quantity, and Knowledge Interests Avoiding Confusions. In: Bauer MW, Gaskell G, editors. Qualitative Researching With Test, Image and Sound. London: Sage; 2000. p. 3–17.CrossRef Bauer MW, Gaskell G, Allum NC. Quality, Quantity, and Knowledge Interests Avoiding Confusions. In: Bauer MW, Gaskell G, editors. Qualitative Researching With Test, Image and Sound. London: Sage; 2000. p. 3–17.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Legard R, Keegan J, Ward K. In-Depth Interviews. In: Legard R, Keegan J, War K, editors. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage; 2003. p. 138–330. Legard R, Keegan J, Ward K. In-Depth Interviews. In: Legard R, Keegan J, War K, editors. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage; 2003. p. 138–330.
22.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 1999. Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 1999.
24.
go back to reference Orne MT. On the social psychology of the psychological experiment with special reference to demand characteristics and their implications. Am Psychol. 1962;17:776–83.CrossRef Orne MT. On the social psychology of the psychological experiment with special reference to demand characteristics and their implications. Am Psychol. 1962;17:776–83.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Under consumers’ scrutiny - an investigation into consumers’ attitudes and concerns about nudging in the realm of health behavior
Authors
Astrid F Junghans
Tracy TL Cheung
Denise DT De Ridder
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1691-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Go to the issue