Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Anesthesia 6/2022

27-08-2022 | Ultrasound | Original Article

Usefulness and accuracy of a handheld ultrasound device for epidurssal landmark and depth assessment by anesthesiology residents

Authors: Motonobu Kimizuka, Yasuyuki Tokinaga, Mayu Taguchi, Kanako Takahashi, Michiaki Yamakage

Published in: Journal of Anesthesia | Issue 6/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness and accuracy of a handheld ultrasound device (Accuro, Rivanna Medical, Charlottesville, VA, USA) for epidural landmark and depth assessment when epidural anesthesia is performed by residents.

Methods

Patients scheduled to receive epidural anesthesia were randomly assigned to the Accuro group (group A) or control group (group C). In group A, the depth to the epidural space and the appropriate place for epidural insertion according to Accuro was recorded. In group C, epidural anesthesia was performed using a conventional method. The following were recorded and compared between the groups: time from puncture of the Tuohy needle to loss of resistance, number of Tuohy needle redirects, and epidural-related complications. In group A, depth to the epidural space estimated by Accuro (Accuro Depth) and the actual depth measured with a marker on the needle (Needle Depth) were recorded and compared.

Results

Sixty patients were enrolled during the study period. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding the median or range of time required to locate the epidural space.
The number of Tuohy needle redirects was 0 (0–3) in group A and 1.5 (0–7) in group C (P = 0.012). Accuro Depth was less than Needle Depth [mean difference, 0.85 cm (95% CI−1.10 to − 0.62), SD = 0.62].

Conclusions

Although there was no significant difference in time from Tuohy needle puncture to loss of resistance, Accuro reduced the number of Tuohy needle redirects and accurately indicated the depth to the epidural space. Accuro may be useful for identifying the needle insertion point and estimating depth to the epidural space when residents perform epidural anesthesia.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abrahams MS, Aziz MF, Fu RF, Horn JL. Ultrasound guidance compared with electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:408–17.CrossRefPubMed Abrahams MS, Aziz MF, Fu RF, Horn JL. Ultrasound guidance compared with electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:408–17.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Barrington MJ, Kluger R. Ultrasound guidance reduces the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity following peripheral nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38:289–99.CrossRefPubMed Barrington MJ, Kluger R. Ultrasound guidance reduces the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity following peripheral nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38:289–99.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Furness G, Reilly MP, Kuchi S. An evaluation of ultrasound imaging for identification of lumbar intervertebral level. Anaesthesia. 2002;57:277–80.CrossRefPubMed Furness G, Reilly MP, Kuchi S. An evaluation of ultrasound imaging for identification of lumbar intervertebral level. Anaesthesia. 2002;57:277–80.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Broadbent CR, Maxwell WB, Ferrie R, Wilson DJ, Gawne-Cain M, Russell R. Ability of anaesthesia to identify a marked lumbar interspace. Anaesthesia. 2000;55:1122–6.CrossRefPubMed Broadbent CR, Maxwell WB, Ferrie R, Wilson DJ, Gawne-Cain M, Russell R. Ability of anaesthesia to identify a marked lumbar interspace. Anaesthesia. 2000;55:1122–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kim SW, Kim YM, Kim SH, Chung MH, Choi YR, Choi EM. Comparison of loss of resistance technique between Epidrum® and conventional method for identifying the epidural space. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012;62:322–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim SW, Kim YM, Kim SH, Chung MH, Choi YR, Choi EM. Comparison of loss of resistance technique between Epidrum® and conventional method for identifying the epidural space. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012;62:322–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Gülen G, Akkaya T, Ozkan D, Kaydul M, Gözaydin O, Gümüş H. Comparison of spring-loaded, loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques in lumbar epidural blocks. Agri. 2012;24:37–41.CrossRefPubMed Gülen G, Akkaya T, Ozkan D, Kaydul M, Gözaydin O, Gümüş H. Comparison of spring-loaded, loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques in lumbar epidural blocks. Agri. 2012;24:37–41.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Tawfik MM, Atallah MM, Elkharboutly WS, Allakkany NS, Abdelkhalek M. Does preprocedural ultrasound increase the first-pass success rate of epidural catheterization before cesarean delivery? A randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2017;124:851–6.CrossRefPubMed Tawfik MM, Atallah MM, Elkharboutly WS, Allakkany NS, Abdelkhalek M. Does preprocedural ultrasound increase the first-pass success rate of epidural catheterization before cesarean delivery? A randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2017;124:851–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Seligman KM, Weiniger CF, Carvalho B. The accuracy of a handheld ultrasound device for neuraxial depth and landmark assessment: a prospective cohort trial. Anesth Analg. 2018;126:1995–8.CrossRefPubMed Seligman KM, Weiniger CF, Carvalho B. The accuracy of a handheld ultrasound device for neuraxial depth and landmark assessment: a prospective cohort trial. Anesth Analg. 2018;126:1995–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Usefulness and accuracy of a handheld ultrasound device for epidurssal landmark and depth assessment by anesthesiology residents
Authors
Motonobu Kimizuka
Yasuyuki Tokinaga
Mayu Taguchi
Kanako Takahashi
Michiaki Yamakage
Publication date
27-08-2022
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia / Issue 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0913-8668
Electronic ISSN: 1438-8359
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-022-03096-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2022

Journal of Anesthesia 6/2022 Go to the issue