Skip to main content
Top
Published in: African Journal of Urology 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Ultrasound | Original Research

Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: periprostatic block versus caudal block for analgesia—a randomized trial

Authors: Oluwatobi Ayodeji Fasola, Augustine Oghenewyin Takure, Olayiwola B. Shittu

Published in: African Journal of Urology | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy is a potentially painful procedure, due to the insertion of the TRUS probe in the anus and multiple passes of the biopsy needle through the rectum and prostate. Several methods of reducing pain and discomfort have been described. These include intra-rectal local anaesthetic gel (IRLA) instillation, periprostatic nerve block (PPNB), caudal block (CB) and oral analgesics. CB has potential complications of dural puncture and anaesthetic failure, while PPNB may be complicated by intravascular injection with systemic local anaesthetic toxicity. Only few studies have compared transrectal PPNB with CB with equivocal results. This study compared transrectal PPNB to CB in terms of efficacy of analgesia and incidence of complications.

Methods

A prospective randomized clinical trial was carried out among 80 consenting patients with an indication for TRUS-guided prostate biopsy in the Urology division of [BLINDED FOR PEER REVIEW]. Eighty participants were each randomized to either of Group A (CB with 10 ml of 2% lidocaine) or Group B (PPNB with a total of 20 ml of 1% lidocaine). Pain was assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS), and questions on satisfaction with the procedure and willingness for a repeat procedure were asked. The incidence of complications was also recorded.

Results

There were no significant differences in the mean ages, body mass indices (BMIs), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, digital rectal examination (DRE) findings and prostate sizes between the two groups. The mean NRS scores at administration of block, insertion of TRUS probe, prostate biopsy, 30 min and 1 day after biopsy were 2.9 ± 2.3, 2.1 ± 2.2, 3.1 ± 2.6, 1.4 ± 2.2 and 0.2 ± 0.4 respectively for CB and 3.1 ± 2.2, 2.3 ± 1.2, 2.8 ± 2.7, 1.4 ± 1.7 and 0.3 ± 0.5, respectively, for the PPNB group. There were no significant differences between the mean scores in both groups. There were also no statistically significant differences in the incidences of complications in both groups.

Conclusion

The two methods of analgesia are similar in efficacy and are equally safe to employ in the performance of TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Both methods can be learned to increase the repertoire of the urologist when faced with a TRUS-guided prostate biopsy.

Trial registration

PACTR, PACTR202012779661309. Registered 11th December 2020—Retrospectively registered, https://​pactr.​samrc.​ac.​za/​TrialDisplay.​aspx?​TrialID=​14564.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Menegoz F, Lutz JM, Mousseau M, Orfeuvre H, Schaerer R (2019) Descriptive epidemiology of prostate cancer. World J Oncol 10(2):63–89CrossRef Menegoz F, Lutz JM, Mousseau M, Orfeuvre H, Schaerer R (2019) Descriptive epidemiology of prostate cancer. World J Oncol 10(2):63–89CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Daniyal M, Siddiqui ZA, Akram M, Asif HM, Sultana S, Khan A (2014) Epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 15(22):9575–9578CrossRef Daniyal M, Siddiqui ZA, Akram M, Asif HM, Sultana S, Khan A (2014) Epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 15(22):9575–9578CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ramey JR, Halpern EJ, Gomella LG (2007). In: Wein A, Kavoussi L, Novick A, Partin A, Peters C (eds) Ultrasonography and biopsy of the prostate, 9th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 2883–2895 Ramey JR, Halpern EJ, Gomella LG (2007). In: Wein A, Kavoussi L, Novick A, Partin A, Peters C (eds) Ultrasonography and biopsy of the prostate, 9th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 2883–2895
4.
go back to reference Amling CL, Spencer CR, Roberts JL (2004) Practice patterns in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: results of a questionnaire survey of practicing urologists. J Urol 171:1809 Amling CL, Spencer CR, Roberts JL (2004) Practice patterns in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: results of a questionnaire survey of practicing urologists. J Urol 171:1809
5.
go back to reference Crundwell M, Cooke P, Wallace D (1999) Patients’ tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsy: an audit of 104 cases. BJU Int 83:792–795CrossRef Crundwell M, Cooke P, Wallace D (1999) Patients’ tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsy: an audit of 104 cases. BJU Int 83:792–795CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Collins GN, Lloyd SN, Hehir M, McKelvie GB (1993) Multiple transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsies—true morbidity and patient acceptance. Br J Urol 71(4):460–463CrossRef Collins GN, Lloyd SN, Hehir M, McKelvie GB (1993) Multiple transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsies—true morbidity and patient acceptance. Br J Urol 71(4):460–463CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Seymour H, Perry MJA, Lee-Elliot C, Dundas D, Patel U (2001) Pain after transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy: the advantages of periprostatic local anaesthesia. BJU Int 88(6):540–544CrossRef Seymour H, Perry MJA, Lee-Elliot C, Dundas D, Patel U (2001) Pain after transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy: the advantages of periprostatic local anaesthesia. BJU Int 88(6):540–544CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ikuerowo SO, Popoola AA, Olapade-Olaopa EO, Okeke LI, Shittu OB, Adebayo SA et al (2010) Caudal block anesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy. Int Urol Nephrol 42(1):19–22CrossRef Ikuerowo SO, Popoola AA, Olapade-Olaopa EO, Okeke LI, Shittu OB, Adebayo SA et al (2010) Caudal block anesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy. Int Urol Nephrol 42(1):19–22CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Horinaga M, Nakashima J, Nakanoma T (2006) Efficacy compared between caudal block and periprostatic local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy. Urology 68(2):348–351CrossRef Horinaga M, Nakashima J, Nakanoma T (2006) Efficacy compared between caudal block and periprostatic local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy. Urology 68(2):348–351CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Urabe F, Kimura T, Shimomura T, Onuma H, Yamamoto T, Sasaki H et al (2017) Prospective comparison of the efficacy of caudal versus periprostatic nerve block, both with intrarectal local anesthesia, during transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostatic needle biopsy. Scand J Urol 51(4):245–250CrossRef Urabe F, Kimura T, Shimomura T, Onuma H, Yamamoto T, Sasaki H et al (2017) Prospective comparison of the efficacy of caudal versus periprostatic nerve block, both with intrarectal local anesthesia, during transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostatic needle biopsy. Scand J Urol 51(4):245–250CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Udeh EI, Ozoemena OFN, Ogwuche E (2019) The relationship between prostate volume and international prostate symptom score in Africans with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Niger J Med 21(3):290–295 Udeh EI, Ozoemena OFN, Ogwuche E (2019) The relationship between prostate volume and international prostate symptom score in Africans with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Niger J Med 21(3):290–295
12.
go back to reference Obi AO, Okafor VU, Nnodi PI (2011) Prospective randomized trial of spinal saddle block versus periprostatic lignocaine for anesthesia during transrectal prostate biopsy. Urology 77(2):280–285CrossRef Obi AO, Okafor VU, Nnodi PI (2011) Prospective randomized trial of spinal saddle block versus periprostatic lignocaine for anesthesia during transrectal prostate biopsy. Urology 77(2):280–285CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wang N, Fu Y, Ma H, Wang J, Gao Y (2016) Advantages of caudal block over intrarectal local anesthesia plus periprostatic nerve block for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Pak J Med Sci 32(4):978–982PubMedPubMedCentral Wang N, Fu Y, Ma H, Wang J, Gao Y (2016) Advantages of caudal block over intrarectal local anesthesia plus periprostatic nerve block for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Pak J Med Sci 32(4):978–982PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: periprostatic block versus caudal block for analgesia—a randomized trial
Authors
Oluwatobi Ayodeji Fasola
Augustine Oghenewyin Takure
Olayiwola B. Shittu
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
African Journal of Urology / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1110-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1961-9987
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-021-00185-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

African Journal of Urology 1/2021 Go to the issue